<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Year, Same Old Nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/01/new-year-same-old-nonsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/01/new-year-same-old-nonsense/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/01/new-year-same-old-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-8476</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankaneonline.com/?p=2765#comment-8476</guid>
		<description>Wow.  That is the biggest load of self-promoting bullshit I have ever read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That is the biggest load of self-promoting bullshit I have ever read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Pedersen</title>
		<link>http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/01/new-year-same-old-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-8475</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Pedersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankaneonline.com/?p=2765#comment-8475</guid>
		<description>Decade&#039;s are NOT named until they are over....

As Village Voice&#039;s Musto has pointed out that &quot;Yes, the aughts...are
coming to a close in a few months, and every media outlet in the world
is scrambling to drum up a clever way to sum them up.&quot;

I have the answer:

Aughties, Naughties, Naughts, Aughts or Naughty Aughties

As NY Times&#039; Segal reported, one choice is supported by science fiction writer, David Brin, who recommends the &quot;Noughty-aughts&quot;.

w/  over 1,458,000 combined Google Hits

For a humorous sing along 2009 Year in review presentation, visit:

http://unclejayexplains.com/2009/12/20/uncle-jay-explains-year-in-review/

Brief review of being &quot;Naughty in the Aughties&quot;

2009 - Death of MJ
2008 - Wall Street Bailout
2007 - Recall for lead Paint
2006 - Cheney Shoots Friend
2005 - Gov&#039;t Response to Katrina
2004 - Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction
2003 - Paris Hilton Tape
2002 - Forest Worker Starts Fire
2001 - Clinton Admits False Testimony
2000 - Florida Decides Next President


The only NUMERICAL &amp; MNEMONICALLY correct phrases to name the century&#039;s first decade are AUGHTIES, NAUGHTIES, NAUGHTS, AUGHTS or NAUGHTY AUGHTIES.

A few suggestions use one or more specific events that occurred during the decade. They will probably never be used from a radio and broadcasting point of view because they do not encompass this whole decade and they aren&#039;t pleasing to the ear.  Radio stations introduce their programming along the lines of “Music from the 80s, 90s and Today”.  Soon, they’ll be replacing it with “Music from the 90s (NineTIES), ______TIES and Today”.  The best choices contain either AUGHTIES, NAUGHTIES, NAUGHTY AUGHTIES, NAUGHTS or AUGHTS.  Using events usually requires one to use adages like &quot;The Age of&quot; or &quot;Era&quot; which is more descriptive of a time period, not necessarily an actual decade.  There is a huge difference between what a decade is &quot;remembered for&quot; versus what a decade is &quot;referred to as&quot;.  Many suggestions (Age of Confusion, , Era of Misplaced Anxiety, Decade of Disruptions, North goes South, etc) do NOT pass this simple litmus test.  Any suggestion that would require you to be a history buff in the future, shouldn&#039;t even be considered.

The media needs to embrace the only viable choice from a NUMERICAL &amp; MNEMONICAL point of view.  The first decade of previous generations did not have this sense of urgency as mass marketing really didn&#039;t exist.  The mass marketing concept was introduced to the public with the advent of radio broadcasting of the mid 1920&#039;s (Roaring Twenties) and heightened in the 1940&#039;s with television accessibility.

Why Naughty Aughties?  We NEED an identifier.  Not many people can pinpoint the actual years of Generation X and Generation Y, the Stone Age or the Industrial Revolution.  Naughty Aughties and its offshoots leave no doubt to this identity as “naught” and “aught” both mean zero.  Jazzing up “Naught” to “Naughty” and combining it with “Aughties”, inadvertently describes the tone of the first decade that includes the Years 2000-2009.  Marketing sense tells us that the 00’s are not memorable enough nor are they appealing to the public.  Naughty Aughties is simple, catchy, rhymes and intimates fun and mischievous behavior, as well as being sweet and sexy.  Previous decades are easily identifiable and well marketed, but until now, there seemed to be no cohesion for the years 2000-2009.  Naughty Aughties fills the void in a fun and “roll off your tongue” sort of way. 

Obviously, many “naughty” things have occurred in the entertainment, political, sporting and economic arenas from global, national and local perspectives that may depict our moral compass.  Jackson’s Superbowl Half-time show, OJ Simpson, Britney Spears, Enron, Martha Stewart, Cheney and Clinton are just a few highlights.  Can you come up with more?  Sure, you can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decade&#8217;s are NOT named until they are over&#8230;.</p>
<p>As Village Voice&#8217;s Musto has pointed out that &#8220;Yes, the aughts&#8230;are<br />
coming to a close in a few months, and every media outlet in the world<br />
is scrambling to drum up a clever way to sum them up.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have the answer:</p>
<p>Aughties, Naughties, Naughts, Aughts or Naughty Aughties</p>
<p>As NY Times&#8217; Segal reported, one choice is supported by science fiction writer, David Brin, who recommends the &#8220;Noughty-aughts&#8221;.</p>
<p>w/  over 1,458,000 combined Google Hits</p>
<p>For a humorous sing along 2009 Year in review presentation, visit:</p>
<p><a href="http://unclejayexplains.com/2009/12/20/uncle-jay-explains-year-in-review/" rel="nofollow">http://unclejayexplains.com/2009/12/20/uncle-jay-explains-year-in-review/</a></p>
<p>Brief review of being &#8220;Naughty in the Aughties&#8221;</p>
<p>2009 &#8211; Death of MJ<br />
2008 &#8211; Wall Street Bailout<br />
2007 &#8211; Recall for lead Paint<br />
2006 &#8211; Cheney Shoots Friend<br />
2005 &#8211; Gov&#8217;t Response to Katrina<br />
2004 &#8211; Janet Jackson Wardrobe Malfunction<br />
2003 &#8211; Paris Hilton Tape<br />
2002 &#8211; Forest Worker Starts Fire<br />
2001 &#8211; Clinton Admits False Testimony<br />
2000 &#8211; Florida Decides Next President</p>
<p>The only NUMERICAL &amp; MNEMONICALLY correct phrases to name the century&#8217;s first decade are AUGHTIES, NAUGHTIES, NAUGHTS, AUGHTS or NAUGHTY AUGHTIES.</p>
<p>A few suggestions use one or more specific events that occurred during the decade. They will probably never be used from a radio and broadcasting point of view because they do not encompass this whole decade and they aren&#8217;t pleasing to the ear.  Radio stations introduce their programming along the lines of “Music from the 80s, 90s and Today”.  Soon, they’ll be replacing it with “Music from the 90s (NineTIES), ______TIES and Today”.  The best choices contain either AUGHTIES, NAUGHTIES, NAUGHTY AUGHTIES, NAUGHTS or AUGHTS.  Using events usually requires one to use adages like &#8220;The Age of&#8221; or &#8220;Era&#8221; which is more descriptive of a time period, not necessarily an actual decade.  There is a huge difference between what a decade is &#8220;remembered for&#8221; versus what a decade is &#8220;referred to as&#8221;.  Many suggestions (Age of Confusion, , Era of Misplaced Anxiety, Decade of Disruptions, North goes South, etc) do NOT pass this simple litmus test.  Any suggestion that would require you to be a history buff in the future, shouldn&#8217;t even be considered.</p>
<p>The media needs to embrace the only viable choice from a NUMERICAL &amp; MNEMONICAL point of view.  The first decade of previous generations did not have this sense of urgency as mass marketing really didn&#8217;t exist.  The mass marketing concept was introduced to the public with the advent of radio broadcasting of the mid 1920&#8242;s (Roaring Twenties) and heightened in the 1940&#8242;s with television accessibility.</p>
<p>Why Naughty Aughties?  We NEED an identifier.  Not many people can pinpoint the actual years of Generation X and Generation Y, the Stone Age or the Industrial Revolution.  Naughty Aughties and its offshoots leave no doubt to this identity as “naught” and “aught” both mean zero.  Jazzing up “Naught” to “Naughty” and combining it with “Aughties”, inadvertently describes the tone of the first decade that includes the Years 2000-2009.  Marketing sense tells us that the 00’s are not memorable enough nor are they appealing to the public.  Naughty Aughties is simple, catchy, rhymes and intimates fun and mischievous behavior, as well as being sweet and sexy.  Previous decades are easily identifiable and well marketed, but until now, there seemed to be no cohesion for the years 2000-2009.  Naughty Aughties fills the void in a fun and “roll off your tongue” sort of way. </p>
<p>Obviously, many “naughty” things have occurred in the entertainment, political, sporting and economic arenas from global, national and local perspectives that may depict our moral compass.  Jackson’s Superbowl Half-time show, OJ Simpson, Britney Spears, Enron, Martha Stewart, Cheney and Clinton are just a few highlights.  Can you come up with more?  Sure, you can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

