<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balancing Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/25/balancing-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/25/balancing-act/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelley</title>
		<link>http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/25/balancing-act/comment-page-1/#comment-8485</link>
		<dc:creator>shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankaneonline.com/?p=2898#comment-8485</guid>
		<description>I for one am happy to see you posting more, Brian.  And your clever is back in high gear ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am happy to see you posting more, Brian.  And your clever is back in high gear &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/25/balancing-act/comment-page-1/#comment-8483</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankaneonline.com/?p=2898#comment-8483</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You’ve been on a roll with posts these last few days.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, but you&#039;ll recall I had absolutely nothing to post about for most of the month of December.   Some days there&#039;s so much interesting stuff I can&#039;t begin to keep up, others not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You’ve been on a roll with posts these last few days.</i></p>
<p>Yes, but you&#8217;ll recall I had absolutely nothing to post about for most of the month of December.   Some days there&#8217;s so much interesting stuff I can&#8217;t begin to keep up, others not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/25/balancing-act/comment-page-1/#comment-8482</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankaneonline.com/?p=2898#comment-8482</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve been on a roll with posts these last few days.  As Maine (and practically every other state) struggles with budget problems and, consequently, every unit of local government struggles with budget problems, I have found myself wondering more and more frequently whether the boundaries of many political subdivisions (states, counties, municipalities) really make sense any more:  Beyond whether they make sense from an economic, political, or legal perspective, how many of them are really relevant in terms of how we identify ourselves?

Reminds me somewhat of &quot;Nine Nations of North America,&quot; which you recommended to me and, I think, have mentioned here before, only that was more an exercise in the demographic and cultural distinctions you allude to, as I recall.  More than once lately I&#039;ve found myself thinking, &quot;there was a time when all this was new; why do we have to keep these boundaries if they don&#039;t work for us any more?&quot;  Problem is, I don&#039;t think Massachusetts wants Maine back, and I know for sure there are many people in Maine who would rather be part of New Hampshire (or Idaho) than a province of the commonwealth.  Not like it&#039;s going to happen anyway....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve been on a roll with posts these last few days.  As Maine (and practically every other state) struggles with budget problems and, consequently, every unit of local government struggles with budget problems, I have found myself wondering more and more frequently whether the boundaries of many political subdivisions (states, counties, municipalities) really make sense any more:  Beyond whether they make sense from an economic, political, or legal perspective, how many of them are really relevant in terms of how we identify ourselves?</p>
<p>Reminds me somewhat of &#8220;Nine Nations of North America,&#8221; which you recommended to me and, I think, have mentioned here before, only that was more an exercise in the demographic and cultural distinctions you allude to, as I recall.  More than once lately I&#8217;ve found myself thinking, &#8220;there was a time when all this was new; why do we have to keep these boundaries if they don&#8217;t work for us any more?&#8221;  Problem is, I don&#8217;t think Massachusetts wants Maine back, and I know for sure there are many people in Maine who would rather be part of New Hampshire (or Idaho) than a province of the commonwealth.  Not like it&#8217;s going to happen anyway&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karan</title>
		<link>http://www.briankaneonline.com/2010/01/25/balancing-act/comment-page-1/#comment-8479</link>
		<dc:creator>Karan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briankaneonline.com/?p=2898#comment-8479</guid>
		<description>At least I won&#039;t have to change my address labels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least I won&#8217;t have to change my address labels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

