Category Politics

Michael Foot

The Labour Party of Britain was born in 1900 as the confederation of three labor-oriented political parties, and stood as the bastion of the establishment left in British politics for most of the 20th century. Though Labour led the government a number of times, the ascendancy of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservatives in the 1980s diminished the party’s political strength and popularity. The leader of Labour in the early 1980s was Michael Foot, who passed away this week at the age of 96. The disastrous election loss in 1983 shook up Labour, forced out Foot, and led to the rise of Tony Blair and what is called “New Labour” — a more centrist, if not outright conservative, platform that has held the government since the mid-1990s (although it is widely expected that the Conservatives are likely to return to power in the next general election).

In reading the several obituaries and blog posts I ran across, I was most impressed by this quote from Foot that reminded me very of why there was, and still is, a need for social democratic politics and political parties, not just in the U.K. but all over the world:

“We are not here in this world to find elegant solutions, pregnant with initiative, or to serve the ways and modes of profitable progress. No, we are here to provide for all those who are weaker and hungrier, more battered and crippled than ourselves. The is our only certain good and great purpose on earth, and if you ask me about those insoluble economic problems that may arise if the top is deprived of their initiative, I would answer, to hell with them. the top is greedy and mean and will always find a way to take care of themselves. They always do.”

British and American liberal politicians alike need to be shaken from their from their cozy alliances with “the top” and restored to their roots as the champions of the working man. The passing of Foot, like the passing of Ted Kennedy, reminds us that there are too few people like them left.

See Also

An Aggregation Of Nincompoops

According to Alex Massie, writing in Foreign Policy, that’s how the Obama Administration is seen by counterparts in Europe, having piddled away the enormous political capital among those groups much the same way he has with the American public: an inability to turn an overwhelming legislative majority into forward progress, lack of follow-through on foreign policy reforms and initiatives that were seen as “must-haves” by the European public after eight very long years of George Bush, and waffling on global issues like “cap and trade” policy for climate change…all due to what is perceived as political incompetence. What we see as “insider baseball” with stories about in-fighting between Obama advisors like Rahm Emanuel, the rest of the world sees as fiddling while Rome burns.

Posting at True/Slant, journalist Jamie Malanowski brings a more American perspective:

Sometime, somewhere, some friend of the president needs to give him a swift kick in the ass. Somebody ought to explain to him that the country is hopping mad, and it’s mad not because `government is too big’ but because people don’t have jobs and the government isn’t doing anything about it and—here’s the kicker—highly bonused investment bankers whose skins were saved by the public continue to wager and collect without impunity. It would do the president a world of good if instead of inviting Republicans to come over for milk and cookies, he began directing throwing his weight around—ordering this, directing that, opening an investigation on something else. He must stop yielding his authority to compose the national narrative to tea baggers and Fox Newsmen.

The publisher of Harper’s Magazine, John R. MacArthur, suggests that maybe what Obama needs to get his skinny ass in gear is a primary challenge in 2012, and he offers a specific suggestion: Howard Dean. Dean, who got the boot as DNC chairman after his 50-state campaign strategy helped Obama win in 2008, has been very vocal as the progressive opposition to the hopeless health care reform legislation, and has been winning back support from the disaffected liberal Democratic voters who feel badly betrayed by Obama. MacArthur implies that Dean would only be needed to rattle Obama’s chains a little, not actually offer any stiff resistance to Obama’s re-election bid, but this Politico profile from a few weeks ago points out that Dean might have the juice needed to be a serious contender. Either way, what should be painfully obvious to anyone is that appeasing the Republicans and continuing to try to move to the right is a losing proposition, and if Obama won’t take the hint himself, then maybe somebody else needs to.

See Also

The Madness Of The Right

Getting a lot of attention this morning is a very disquieting piece in Mother Jones about the Oath Keepers, a right-wing militia group that is attracting scores of ex-military and (even more disturbingly) law enforcement personnel in their efforts to prepare for “the coming tyranny”. We on the left have all had our jollies making fun of the pathetic Teabaggers, with their misspelled signs and their wacky conspiracies, but these people transcend the nonsense of political foolsmanship because they represent an actual danger to the public. Armed to the teeth, trained for military action, and blinded by ideology, they are the shock troops that would bring ordinary citizens to their knees in seconds if they ever decided to take things into their own hands.

Not getting much attention nationally, there was an arrest in tony Manchester-by-the-Sea here in Massachusetts a couple of weeks ago, where a guy was arrested because he had amassed a frickin’ arsenal in the basement of his house, preparing, he told his wife, for the imminent outbreak of hostilities. His wife actually called the cops and turned him in because she was concerned he was getting ready to start using the guns. Meanwhile, the daughter of the guy who flew his plane into the IRS offices in Austin, Texas, called him a hero on national television (though she subsequently recanted that), and there is serious debate over whether or not the guy committed an act of terrorism, despite his actions meeting every single standard definition of the word, simply because he was a white guy and not an eeeeevil Muslim.

And all of this in the shadow of a pair of political conventions that legitimize and even overtly praise the behaviors and attitudes of these people, with a seemingly unending parade of politicians openly siding with them as they align themselves for the next couple of election cycles.

We can’t keep brushing these people off, dear readers. They are dangerous, they possess a disproportional amount of influence at a time of enormous instability in our political institutions, they have outright control of “the most trusted news source” in the country and have bent the rest of the media to bias in favor of them, and I genuinely believe that all it would take is for one leader figure who was remotely credible to emerge from the pack of idiots like Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, Cheney, et.al. to ignite the entire thing like a match in a lake of gasoline. We are living on borrowed time, I believe, before this person appears.

The parallels to the situation in Weimar Germany and the rise of Hitler are too strong not to mention, even though the mere invocation of Hitler’s name draws instant opprobrium. Hitler was shrugged off by “serious people” in Germany right up to the point that he suddenly won national office and could name his own terms with the struggling leadership. The economic conditions in this country may not have reached the desperate stages of hyperinflation, but 1 out of every 5 people of working age in this country are unemployed or underemployed, and there is little hope for any change in that condition for the foreseeable future. We are ripe for a right-wing demagogue, who can instantly bring to bear armed assistance of supporters numbering in the tens of thousands, and who would likely enjoy the popular approval of at least a full third of the population. Meanwhile, the erosion of checks and balances in our government, and the unchecked expansion of executive powers that began under the last administration and has found little-to-no recision in the present one would present an enormous opportunity to that individual to sweep away everything you and I might think is unshakable about American democracy.

It’s time to stop joking about these people, time to stop dismissing them as the lunatic fringe, and recognize that a clear and present danger exists. My own opinion is that we have gone too far down the road to be able to easily prevent a political upheaval, but it may still be possible to mitigate it, particularly as long as no charismatic leader arises to galvanize the situation. That day will come, however, as it inevitably does, as it always has throughout human history. Don’t close your eyes now, because the danger is right in front of you.

See Also

A Peek At Things To Come?

Everybody’s been so focused on “The Best And Worst Super Bowl Ads” and the back-to-back blizzards in DC that the news about the presidential elections in Ukraine have been below-the-folded into oblivion, but the short version is that the Russian-backed dictator-in-waiting won, and the MILF-y right-wing nutjob chick with the Princess Leia do lost. This article in today’s Slate lays it out in a little more detail, but keeps it comprehensible for people who may not be up to speed on the ins and outs of Ukrainian politics.

What struck me about the whole story, though, is not the rise of a Russian puppet dragging Ukraine back into Moscow’s tent, but rather the slightly disquieting parallels to the political situation in this country and the possibility that, in some weird way, Ukraine is giving us a preview of the 2012 presidential election. To wit: the Orange Revolution of 2004 swept into power the charismatic and then-wildly-popular Viktor Yushchenko. He had movie-star good looks (until the Russians poisoned him and ruined his face) and ran on a platform of massive reform, only to be stymied by having to form a coalition government with Yulia Tymoshenko. The promise of “hope” and “change” was thwarted by parliamentary gridlock and obstructionism, Yushchenko became universally despised by the citizenry, and the global financial crisis has devastated the fragile Ukrainian economy. Yushchenko could only watch from the sidelines as the new election turned into a battle between the nationalist proto-fascist Tymoshenko and the strongman Yanukovych.

As our own political parties seem determined to de-evolve into lunatic fringe groups, we’ve already got the scary-crazy woman all lined up and rarin’ to go, the disgraced and hapless lame duck begging to be a one-term president, and I am just waiting for the Fearless Leader to emerge. We’re really on the verge of succumbing to a strongman who will use the extra-constitutional powers that the last administration successfully latched onto; Congress could effectively be permanently relegated to rubber-stamp status, even as peope like Larry Lessig and Bob Kerrey spell out ways to reform and re-enable Congress.

See Also

Soapbox Hero

The British singer-songwriter Billy Bragg is also a political activist in the U.K., and the Manchester Guardian has this video of him recently standing on a soapbox at Speaker’s Corner in London’s Hyde Park. His speech to the assorted people gathered is about his decision to withhold paying his income taxes in protest over the British government’s mishandling of bonus money being handed out to bankers in a situation not too different from the egregious bonus scandal in this country. What I liked about his speech, though, is how well he explains the importance of taxes to society in general. Teabaggers and similar idiots in this country live in a fantasyland when it comes to taxation, and they have too many people in this country convinced that taxes are EEEEEEEVIL and that somehow everything would be perfect if nobody had to pay them. Bragg makes plain the value of the social contract not just for the general welfare of the people, but also as a political force. American government, even moreso than other democratic governments, derives all of its power from the consent of the governed, contrary to what the Supreme Court would have us think, and taxation is a direct tool of that power. Eliminating taxation deprives citizens of a necessary means of political control, which he demonstrates by refusing to pay his taxes. Granted, the efforts of an individual will never be more than symbolic, but it’s the little lesson in “Why It’s Important” that I wanted to share with you.

See Also

Somewhere, Our Hero Laments

“Kiss your country goodbye” – Alan Grayson

Seven Things About The Economy Everyone Should Be Worried About — Huffington Post

“The Things We Leave Behind” by Sara Robinson

“You can’t hurt us, we’re already dead” — The Daily Show

“Hope Is Fading Fast” — The Propagandist

See Also

I’d Loan Him My Barf Bag, But I’m Gonna Need It Myself

There will be far too much written and said about yesterday’s election in Massachusetts, 99% of which will not be worth the time or trouble to pay any attention to. So I don’t think I’m going to add my own bloviating, but I will share this clip from Monday’s “The Daily Show” wherein Jon Stewart manages to say the 1% that IS worth paying attention to:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Mass Backwards
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis

I’ll also share a quote I saw elsewhere today. An unnamed Massachusetts Democratic Party figure is quoted as saying:

Better Scott Brown for two years than Martha Coakley for a lifetime

That’s probably more indicative of the reality here in Massachusetts than anything anyone in the media (except Jon, of course) has to offer.

See Also

Copyright © BrianKaneOnline

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress