Writing in the conservative technology magazine “The New Atlantis”, editor Ari N. Shulman considers both the good and the bad aspects of our increasing reliance on GPS devices, particularly the in-car version. There are plenty of criticisms to be made, I think, but I’m not sure if I buy the underlying argument that the mediating effect of using a navigational tool is really all that alienating. There’s a bit too much romanticizing about the relationship between the traveler and his surroundings, and not enough consideration about the way the technology expands the ability of the traveler to engage with an unfamiliar location. Still, very worth reading and thinking about.
Category Tech
Download This
Most of the tech blogs I read had at least a mention of this a couple of days ago, but I’ll share the link from Ars Technica, which offers a pretty substantial story: the FCC has released its first-ever survey of actual download speeds from cable ISPs, and this graph caught everybody’s attention because it shows the difference between what the cable companies SAY they give customers for download speeds, and what they actually GET.
As you can see, during the peak hours of Internet usage, 8:00-10:00 p.m., ain’t nobody getting their advertised download speed…except us Verizon FiOS customers, who actually get even better speeds than promised. Things especially suck if you are a Cablevision customer who wants to use the Internet at any time of day other than between 2:00 and 8:00 a.m.
The full FCC report is available in PDF form here
Related Posts:
Technology Unloved Is Technology Unused
Just a couple of Wired stories I’ve come across recently about bits of technology that haven’t been embraced by the public:
The last time I posted about Chumby, it had just been re-designed away from its original soft pillow-like form factor and turned into a smarter version of the digital picture frame. Now, a few months later, it seems that the redesign has been a complete bust. This Wired review explains why.
When Google TV was launched last September, right off the bat I opined that nobody would want one the first moment they saw the monstrous remote control. Well, even my discouragement was outdone by the actual performance of the product. Sales of the device are actually outpaced by people returning the product according to this Wired story.
Related Posts:
RTFM
I have been a devotee of Sid Meier’s Civilization games for nigh on 15 years, beginning with Civilization II (rather like Star Trek, it seems that the even-numbered editions of Civ are the better ones; Civ II was an absolute classic and Civ IV stands as the best iteration so far, while Civ I, III, and V have all been lacking). The complexity of the game is such that an uninitiated player is likely to be overwhelmed if they simply sat down and tried to play the game without at least a short perusal of the manual, and more experienced players spend countless hours working out detailed strategies and analyses that are shared on the several must-read fan forums to help other players improve their game.
Recently, some researchers at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab found that a computer programmed to play Civ II was able to improve its winning percentage by using language processing software to “read” and “comprehend” the game’s manual. The experiment is considered an interesting development in figuring out ways for computers to process meaning in written language, but frankly, I’d be a lot happier if these people woud go to work for Firaxis to help them develop an AI that can play the fucking game without cheating in time for Civ VI.
Related Posts:
An Early Pocket Computer
This is a calculator designed for use by WWII bombardiers to determine the accuracy of their bomb loads during missions. John F. Ptak tells us about the provenance of the device, which was developed by a group of scientists including Vannevar Bush, who is widely considered one of the original visionaries of the modern computer age. It’s also interesting to learn about the relative inaccuracy and imprecision of WWII aerial bombing in comparison to the astoninshing precision of modern missiles and smart weaponry.
Related Posts:
Dammit, Jim, I’m A Doctor, Not A Bricklayer!
The X-Prize Foundation is offering a $10 million prize to whomever can develop a practical device similar to Dr.McCoy’s medical tricorder for diagnosing patients. And they’ve even called the prize the “Tricorder X Prize”, just so there’s no ambiguity over what they’re looking for. The press release I’ve linked to even features the requisite approving blurb quote from Rod Roddenberry, Gene and Majel’s son.
Other scientists in different fields have developed their own tricorder device for doing analysis of minerals, and there’s even a tricorder app for your Android smartphone that uses the phone’s built-in sensors to measure gravitational fields, your rate of speed as you move, and other bits of environmental data.
And check out this DIY phaser that has a laser in it powerful enough to pop balloons (Hey, kid, you’ll shoot yer eye out!)
Related Posts:
Tech News
That’s a picture of a prototype of a very tiny PC that a group called the Raspberry Pi Foundation hopes to turn into a real product that could be sold for about $25. It has 128MB of memory, which is enough to run some flavor of Linux, and would rely on an SD card for storage (presently they go up to 32GB). There’s only one USB port, but you could presumably connect a small hub so you could attach a keyboard and a mouse and maybe even a USB WiFi adapter (since there’s no built-in networking). It would be cool if they do end up being able to bring this to the market for such a small price point, but everything about it reminds me of the hype that went into the OLPC seven or eight years ago. Meanwhile, by the time they do get it to market, smartphones will have replaced PCs anyway.
While we’re talking about tiny tech, here’s a story from Singularity Hub about video cameras the size of a grain of salt that can be used for endoscopy (among other uses) and are intended to be disposable. They’ll probably end up embedded in so many different things your head will explode, but at least there will be plenty of pictures of that moment to share on Facebook.
Aaaand, speaking of ubiquitous cameras and their myriad uses…here’s ANOTHER Singularity Hub post that wonders why we STILL don’t like to engage in video chatting, even though it’s gotten to be essentially free and trivial to set up. If you figure it out, I’m sure the folks at MicroSkype would love to hear it.
Fast Company reports that PBS conducted a survey of iPad users with children as part of their effort to develop some iPad apps and discovered that 70% of them are willing to let their small children play with their iPads and regularly download apps specifically for the kids to play with. Like their headline implies, this really only reaffirms one of the main criticisms leveled at the iPad: that it is simply a toy, albeit a 500-dollar toy. The school board in my hometown might want to take notice of this.
Speaking of tablet computers (man, I am just FULL of segues today), next week Barnes & Noble are expected to announce the next generation of their Nook e-reader (since all of us left behind from the Rapture will have plenty of spare time to catch up on our reading), and Ars Technica recently speculated on what that announcement might entail. Their guess is that it’s a refresh of the original e-ink Nook and not the more advanced color Nook, which lately is everybody’s favorite cheap way to get a tablet computer.
Lastly, British tech news website The Register, who win the award for most frequent non-ironic use of the word “Boffin”, says that it looks like Cisco is going to unload the Linksys home router business as part of the same realignment strategy that saw them discontinue the Flip videocamera a couple of weeks ago. I know the home wireless router business isn’t what it used to be since the cable companies that provide Internet service to most American homes now incorporate wireless routers right into their cable modem devices, but you gotta think that somebody would pick that up.
Related Posts:
Thou Shalt Not Covet Thy Neighbor’s iPad
I’m sure all of my homies know about this story, but if you’re not one of us, you may not have heard that there’s a plan afoot in my hometown of Auburn, Maine to give iPads to all the incoming kindergarten students this fall. The idea is that by giving the youngest students the devices they can jumpstart reading for them, and the school board hopes to be able to come up with the $200K for the devices through private sponsors, but it acknowledges that if the funding doesn’t materialize, the money will come from local taxpayers. So, unsurprisingly, there’s quite a bit of opposition by local parents.
Meanwhile, not only are iPads going to replace kindergarten teachers, they’re also probably going to replace waitstaff at your favorite chain restaurant any day now. Slate describes one company that’s already pilot-testing putting iPads at tables in restaurants to let patrons order their own food directly by making choices on the device that are sent via WiFi to the kitchen, eliminating the need to have a server come to your table to take the order. Of course, they still need people to deliver orders and do a variety of other tasks related to food service, but the robots will be along to handle those jobs soon enough.
(SImularly, the New York Times says that pretty soon we’ll be able to do away with lawyers and let computer software take care of all of our legal needs. From there, it’s just one little step to having a lawyer app on your iPad, so that you can sue anyone anywhere anytime! Isn’t technology wonderful?)
While iPads may be teaching our kids how to read someday, letting us ask for our salad dressing on the side, or filing a restraining order against that creepy guy who keeps walking past our house, we may be getting a little ahead of ourselves. According to Google, almost 20% of people who own smartphones never use them to go online and a whopping 32% don’t use apps at all. And we already know that apps only get used one time by the people who download them 26% of the time.
Related Posts:
The Final Frontier
Much note is being made today of the 50th anniversary of Yuri Gagarin’s spaceflight, inaugurating the beginning of human travel into outer space. The first decade of the Space Age remains its absolute pinnacle, while today, half a century later, it seems less and less likely all the time that we will ever explore strange new worlds.
Since 2001, people in cities across the globe have marked the anniversary of Gagarin’s orbit by celebrating “Yuri’s Night” with hundreds of parties and special events. This year there is also a downloadable movie called “First Orbit” which recreates what Gagarin might have seen on his flight by taking images recorded aboard the International Space Station and combining them with recordings of the actual radio communications between Gagarin and the Soviet space controllers at Baikonur, along with an original musical score. There is also a smartphone app you can download on your iPhone or Android phone.
Probably not in the movie: the Russian government recently released hundred of pages of declassified material about Gagarin’s flight, including a transcript of a conversation between Gagarin and Sergei Korolev, the famed “Chief Designer” of the Soviet space program. It’s a fairly mundane interaction, wherein Korolev tells Gagarin where to find his rations (some sausage, tea, jam, and candy…but no Tang) and asks him to slap some tape on a broken control.
Also not widely discussed: Gagarin nearly died during the re-entry of his spacecraft. The capsule failed to detach from the instrument control module, causing a small fuel leak that resulted in the spacecraft not slowing as much as planned. The vehicle dangerously overheated, and Gagarin later reported smelling something burning inside his capsule. Six years later, another Soviet cosmonaut, Vladimir Komarov, would indeed die during reentry due to mechanical failures. Komarov and others in the Soviet space program knew that the spacecraft intended for that flight was defective, and when political pressure from Moscow forced them to go ahead with the flight anyway, Komarov convinced his superiors to bump Gagarin, who had been scheduled to make that flight. Komarov knowingly sacrificed himself to save Gagarin’s life. It was a sacrifice made in vain, because Gagarin himself was killed less than a year later when his test plane crashed. The cause of the crash was not fully determined until last year, and was grist for speculation of conspiracy for decades.
The United States will commemorate the beginning of its own manned space program with the 50th anniversary of Alan Shepard’s suborbital flight next month. Despite, or because of, the early successes of the Soviet program, America would achieve the single greatest engineering accomplishment in human history to date — the first landing of human beings on the surface of the moon — less than a decade after Gagarin’s flight. But forty years after that milestone, the American manned space program has been diminished to almost non-existant. The final mission of the space shuttle Discovery was last month, and that shuttle is already in the decomissioning process on its way to becoming a museum piece. The shuttle Endeavour sits on the launch pad waiting to close out the last chapter of that history with its launch on April 29. Writing at Salon, New America Foundation think-tank policy head Michael Lind rather assiduously argues that manned spaceflight is unnecessary and unsupportable, and that NASA does and should continue to aggressively pursue space exploration with increasingly-capable robots and unmanned probes. Cosmos Online founder Alan Finkel argues even more deliberately that our technology has pushed our physical capabilities for spaceflight to their maximum in terms of both the physics involved in sending spacecraft into deep space and the biological limitations of human beings, and that we may not be able to exceed those limits for a long time, if ever. Even among the veteran astronauts, there is division over whether or not to continue a manned space program. Last year, Apollo astronauts Neil Armstrong and Gene Cernan sent a letter to President Obama encouraging him not to cut back on the manned programs still underway at NASA, while Russell Schweickart (Apollo 9) sent another letter calling for a change in direction and the increased role of private business in space.
It does seem more likely that any further human ventures into space will be incremental for some long time to come, and perhaps Alan Finkel is correct that we may simply never find a way for human beings to travel even as far as Mars without asking the future astronauts to go on their own suicide missions. Maybe that explains why, as astronomers discover dozens upon dozens of new planets all the time, there is no sign of interstellar transit by the beings that must exist somewhere out there. Half a century after one man gently peeked beyond the curtain of our world for the first time, we are still not much beyond that window.












