Tag Adam Savage

Myth…Busted

Last week, Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman, the stars of MythBusters, were in town to accept the 2008 Outstanding Lifetime Award in Cultural Humanism from the Harvard Humanist Society.

Adam, who is not only an atheist but, as he mentions, a fourth-generation atheist, delivered a wonderful acceptance speech that references Carlos Castaneda’s philosophical tome “The Eagle’s Gift” as his inspiration to expand his consciousness through science and reason. The folks at BoingBoing not only transcribed the speech, they made a cool looking webpage just to display it.

Jamie’s remarks haven’t been similarly posted yet, although one commenter at that link who was apparently there said that he started off by saying “What he said.”

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Just Tell Them Adam And Jamie Did It

Oh those wacky MythBusters! They just can’t bear to go a single episode without an earth-shattering kaboom. Apparently, yesterday, Adam Savage, Jamie Hyneman and crew were just outside some sleepy little suburb east of their home base in San Francisco, blowing shit to smithereens as usual. This time, though, they got a little carried away and used enough explosives to shatter windows all over town. Oops.

Even though Adam and Jamie always tell you “Don’t try this at home…EVER!”, I am going to share with you this webpage which tells you how to make your own thermite. Thermite is a substance made up of iron oxide and, most commonly, aluminum that burns like a sonofabitch once you ignite it, and the MythBusters use it in stunts when they need something to reach a very high temperature in order to destroy it, or whenever they need something to make a really flashy display (thermite is often used in fireworks, for example). It doesn’t explode, but it can be used to make other things explode, and the military uses it for incendiary munitions when they want to set fire to buildings rather than cause explosions.

So you can imagine the sort of fun you could have with it. Just be prepared to tell the police and fire department that you were SURE you saw a red-headed guy and a walrus with a beret running in the other direction.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Myth: Busted

The other night I was watching a rerun of the Mythbusters episode where they attempt to debunk several elements of the persistent conspiracy theory talk that the moon landings were faked. Quite honestly, some of the ways they chose to debunk the claims were themselves a little less than convincing, as Phil Plait noted back when the episode first aired last August. But the most convincing one they did was a segment where they went to an observatory that has a laser which can pinpoint a series of reflectors placed on the moon by Apollo 17. The astronomer showed them how she aims the laser at known coordinates on the lunar surface, and measures the response — when the laser hits the reflectors (which are big prismic arrays about the size of a car door panel), it basically bounces back and is picked up by the observatory’s instruments. Thus, it is demonstrable that the astronauts did go to the moon and deliberately leave the reflectors in documented locations.

Works for me, since I have no doubt in my mind in the first place that we absolutely did send astronauts to the moon and bring them back again. But if you STILL need more hard evidence, well, maybe THIS will sell you:

India (yes, I said India) launched its first lunar probe, Chandrayaan, late last year. Apart from the bragging rights and the obvious technological benefits, the ostensible scientific mission of Chandrayaan is to produce a complete three-dimensional atlas of the lunar surface, including mapping the geological, mineralogical and chemical compositions of the surface.

Today, the Times Of India reports, a scientist involved in the project has told them that Chandrayaan has also mapped and photographed the landing sites of five of the six Apollo missions that landed on the moon (via slashdot). This would be the first direct photography of the sites other than the mission photography itself, and further proof of the reality of successful manned landings on the lunar surface.

Of course, this won’t deter the hardcore conspiracy loonies, but it might shut up the occasional asshole in a bar who won’t shut up about such nonsense.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

MythBuster Tally

Though I’m not nearly as devoted to it as I am to “Dirty Jobs”, it’s safe to say that I am a fan of the Discovery Channel series “MythBusters”. In fact, in general, where I used to automatically default to the Food Network when I couldn’t find anything to watch on TV, I now gravitate immediately to Discovery Channel. And, since they LOVE to run their shows into the ground, it’s pretty likely I can catch either an episode of “Dirty Jobs” or “MythBusters” any time, day or night (in fact, Bridget woke up early this morning, turned on the television and watched “Dirty Jobs” at 5:30 a.m.).

For a while, I was making a point of recording the MythBuster episodes on the TiVo, but we rearranged our assorted home electronics earlier in the summer and in the process all of the programming we had set up on it was erased, so I’m a bit behind. I’ll catch up, no doubt, just by randomly tuning in, but in the meanwhile, I ran across this helpful website which keeps track of the results of each and every “myth” they test.

(If you’re a fan, you might also like to check out Jamie Hyneman’s no-nonsense website for his visual effects company, M5 Industries. Adam Savage has a website, too, but it’s a little stale)

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

His Only Complaint: Not Enough Explosions

In the latest ish of Popular Mechanics, MetaFilter’s Own MythBuster Adam Savage tells us why he thinks the movie “Blade Runner” is still head-and-shoulders ahead of so many special-effects-driven movies. And it’s not just because HE worked on the movie. (NOTE: streaming audio of Adam Savage talking about the film starts automatically when you hit that link)

The article is a little light, but he talks about how some of the effects were achieved and he brings his own detailed knowledge of effects to bear on the subject. His point about the superiority of “in-camera” effects like matte paintings and model work compared to CGI is dead-on: there is still something more “tangible” about effects created through really well-done traditional processes that CGI still can’t quite match.

I can remember going to see “Blade Runner” when it first came out way-back-when and being amazed at the incredible depth of detail that went into creating the backdrop of the future Los Angeles. Even then, in a time without DVD players or digital movies, you just knew that you could go frame-by-frame and find all sorts of things you’d never see watching the film in real time. Unlike Adam Savage, who says he watches the movie once a year or so, I’ve never gone back to look at the film, but his article makes me want to go rent the DVD and stand right up next to the HDTV while it’s playing.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site