Tag AIDS

Thirty Years Later

(click here for larger version)

Yesterday marked the 30th anniversary of the first mention of the disease that would become known as AIDS in the Center for Disease Control’s weekly morbidity and mortality bulletin: a small cluster of deaths from a never-before-seen form of pneumonia. Within the year it would acquire the acronym AIDS and claim a total of 318 lives. Ten years later, the dead would be counted in the tens of thousands. Twenty years later, in the millions. Today, even though the rate of infection stabilized back in the 1990s and actually decreased by 25% in the last decade, there are still 2.8 million AIDS deaths worldwide every year, and over a million Americans are infected with HIV.

The map above comes from this website, which lets you roll your own infographic maps showing county-by-county data for a variety of demographic information about people living with AIDS in the United States.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Yeah, About That…

The relentless churn of the newsmedia juggernaut is so hungry for new material constantly, that a lot of stuff gets rushed to the headlines without the time to really let a story fill out enough to make its weaknesses and inconsistencies more clearly known. Lately, this is especially true with science news. Consider:

The media just about wet itself over the reports that a “Second Earth” had been discovered orbiting around a distant star called Gliese 581. The frenzy got even a little more carried away when one less-than-prudent astrophysicist asserted that he was 100% sure that there was life on Gliese 581g, based on absolutely ZERO evidence (which, I’ll give you, is usually enough for most Republicans anyway). Several weeks later, though, different data from a different team seemed to directly contradict that announcement, and it will take a couple of years to try to determine if there is really a planet there at all, or if Vogt’s team were simply trying to score some media attention ahead of a rival group.

Only a few weeks later, the same sort of thing was repeated when NASA staged a big press event, complete with mysterious pre-announcement about something big-BIG-BIG!!! that had a lot of people openly speculating that extraterrestrial life had been discovered or that an asteroid was about to kill us all, or that somebody caught Miley Cyrus smoking drugs or something. The big announcement wasn’t THAT big, but it was still a pretty interesting bit of news: a team of microbiologists announced that they had “discovered” a strain of bacteria that incorporated arsenic into their DNA. The inference was that this would have to change the way scientists defined “life” as they searched for it on other planets. This “breakthrough” didn’t even last long enough for the news cycle to forget about it, though. P.Z. Myers was all over it the very next day, as were a lot of other people, and now the lead researcher has been making mea culpas in public for letting the hype sell the story.

You probably also heard the breathless report about the man cured of AIDS via stem cell replacement therapy. This wasn’t even a new story, having been first reported as long ago as 2008, so it’s not clear to me why this suddenly got swept into the hype machine unless some lazy-ass reporter surfing Google found it and ran with it. Still, “A Cure For AIDS” is a helluva headline, and so there it went. This follow-up post at BoingBoing, though, includes the missing “rest of the story”: the “cure” was a complete one-off due to a combination of the patient’s own immune system having been destroyed by chemo/radiation treatment for leukemia, and the DNA of the bone marrow donor having a known genetic mutation that resists HIV.

Science is pretty damned amazing, but science reporting sure as hell isn’t.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Perspective

I’ve written before about Maya Waldman, an online acquaintance and Mutual Friend of Torrez who has spent the last several years traveling around the world, mostly in Asia. Presently, she is in the African nation of Zambia, in the southeast of Africa. Like much of sub-Saharan Africa, the population of Zambia is being decimated by AIDS.

This latest post from Maya is about her recent experiences working in an AIDS hospital in Lusaka, where little more can be done than comfort the dying.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Never Had It, Never Will

Noted sex authority, Pope Benedict XVI, seen here at a recent art show in Milan, continued to insist that despite the planet’s population surpassing the 6,666,666,666 mark last week, contraception is a mortal sin in the eyes of the Church.

He must have been really happy to hear that the Duggar Family announced last week that they have conceived Child #20. Or, probably not, come to think of it, because the Duggars are not Catholic, and what Papa Ratzi really means is that the world needs more Catholics, not any of those “not-quite-Christian” religions (not to mention Muslims or Jews). About all *I* can say about the Duggars is to quote Grouch Marx: “I like my cigar, lady, but I take it out of my mouth once in a while.”

This article in The American Prospect by Dana Goldstein took the American media to task for not asking the Pope any tough questions on his recent American visit about the Church’s policies on contraception and its role in the spread of AIDS in the developing world. Goldstein quotes a doctor who treats AIDS patients in Southern Africa:

This is the reality: A married woman living in Southern Africa is at higher risk of becoming infected with HIV than an unmarried woman. Extolling abstinence and fidelity, as the Catholic Church does, will not protect her; in all likelihood she is already monogamous. It is her husband who is likely to have HIV. Yet refusing a husband’s sexual overtures risks ostracism, violence, and destitution for herself and her children.

This Pope occasionally gets referred to as the “Pope of Reason” because many of his appeals rely on the context of reason, but as Morgan Meis wrote around the time of the papal visit, it’s a carefully constructed misdirection. Benedict is using the pretext of reason to argue against modernity itself in favor of a decidedly less friendly and understanding authority in Rome that is more committed to its own power base than any real effort at promoting global harmony. Another American Prospect piece, this one by Adele Stan, points out that his pointed remarks at the Muslims make it clear that he’s offering a “my-way-or-the-highway” route for anyone who is not Catholic.

It’s no wonder Dick Cheney likes this guy so much.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site