Tag Al Gore

Obama Gore For President

Um, so WHO EXACTLY is the candidate I’m supposed to be supporting here?

Y’know, maybe this shows how Hillary messed up. She should have put Bill on the posters. At least then we wouldn’t have had to listen to all the whiny-ass bitchy comments about her pantsuits and such.

I mean, we already elected Al Gore president once. And he would have been 1000% percent better than the asshole whole stole the election. But can I really vote for him again? Because, honestly, I would rather give Al another chance rather than have to vote for Barack Obama. Maybe he could give Obama a high-profile cabinet job to let him cred up a little bit and be president in 2016. Hillary, too. (well, not the president in 2016 part, just the hi-po Cabinet job)

So, yeah, Gore in ’08! And fuck Holy Joe Lieberman, we’ll get a REAL Democrat to share the ticket with Big Al this time.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

We’ll See Who’s Bitter

The scuttlebutt is that Jimmy Carter and Al Gore are going to give Hillary the ol’ one-two punch and let her know it’s time to throw in the towel.

Meanwhile, I think I have found my dream ticket:

Cleese-Obama ’08!

I even have a slogan for them: “I didn’t like the others, they were all too flat!”

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Come Back To The Five & Dime, Howard Dean, Howard Dean

Okay, that magazine cover is from 2004, but I’m seriously wishing the Democrats would drum up a "Draft Dean" movement right about now.  The party regulars made him DNC chairman as a consolation prize for having screwed himself right out of the nomination last time, but also with the clear expectation that they could keep an eye on him there and he wouldn’t cause them much trouble…or at least not run against Hillary in 2008.  But he’s done nothing but irritate the Old Boy Network.  He insisted on a 50-state effort in the 2006 elections and put the party back into the majority in both houses, he’s developed grass-roots efforts that this year are paying off in vast increases in Democratic voter turnout not just in primaries but in caucuses, and he still manages to speak his mind whenever he gets out from under watchful eyes long enough.

The collapse of the Dean campaign four years ago had little to do with Dean’s positions as a candidate, or even his regrettable "YEAARRGGHH!" moment, but about a level of support that was a mile wide but an inch deep.  He fostered a lot of superficial enthusiasm from people not terribly involved in old-school politicking, especially younger voters who wanted "change".  So here we are four years later, and all those college kids who were sure Dean was unstoppable are now the young adult crowd that packs the halls everywhere Barack Obama goes, enchanted by the same nebulous notion of change, but only a little wiser about presidential politics.  Unfortunately, this time their dream candidate is just as superficial as they are.  Meanwhile, the older and more cynical crowd is jumping on the bandwagon out of their own unhappiness with the catch-phrase "Anyone But Clinton", without paying much attention to the point down the road where that chant is likely to bite them in the ass.

So, congratulations to Barack Obama for putting together a coalition of the unwilling and the unthinking but you’ll excuse me if I muster up no enthusiasm.  I’m not convinced that he has the nomination in his pocket because I am convinced that the Clintons will fight a scorched-earth battle to win the Pyrrhic victory of getting the nomination at the price of alienating all those newly-motivated Democratic voters who aren’t QUITE motivated enough to support whichever candidate gets the nomination, just their candidate.

Some people say this all means that the time has come for Al Gore to swoop in and save the day, but his obvious disinterest in returning to the world of electoral politics means the net has to be cast a little wider to snag a draftable candidate.  John Edwards could make a case for being that guy, and I would be okay with that, but why not Howard Dean?  Surely the political newcomers would thrill to the deus ex machina theatrics of a convention that resurrects a candidate that people were so enthused about.  Surely the media would have so much to write about that their heads would explode.  Surely the Republicans would be cast into confusion without their pre-cooked campaigns against "Billary Clinton" and "Barack HUSSEIN Obama".  And we would get a battle-tested, wiser candidate as the nominee, more committed to a progressive agenda than Obama or Clinton and perhaps a chance at real political change instead of just superficiality.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Why Every Vote Counts

Gore Meets Bush

Hey, look! It’s the President of The United States and that idiot Bush meeting in the White House!

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

The Un-Enlightenment

rapture.gif

Back in 2004, in the wake of George Bush’s narrow (and most likely fraudulent) defeat of John Kerry, author and historian Garry Wills famously wrote in the New York Times about the clouds of a new “Un-Enlightenment” amassing over us.

In the three years since, the whirlwind of willful ignorance and public denial of nearly every facet of reason, science, and empiricism has only gained strength. It’s really hard for me to even begin to understand what is driving this wholesale rejection of the amazing discoveries and additions to human knowledge that are perhaps the only positive hallmark of the 20th Century, but there’s no denying that the people who push for a world-view based on fear, ignorance, and the rejection of empiricism in favor of blind faith have gained far more support than I (or anyone else, for that matter) could have possibly imagined when I read Wills’ op-ed then.

This Guardian article reviews a new book by Natalie Angier called “The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science”, and in the process considers a fundamental problem that may go a long way to explaining our culture’s breathtaking abandonment of reason: our society relegates almost all of our basic education of science to our earliest years of education, turning away from science, math, and other “hard” topics to “softer” ones when children reach their teen years (literature, art, music). As a result, we are left with a decidedly imperfect understanding of even the most basic tenets of science and math, which, if we do not pursue them ourselves in college, become dim and only vaguely understood at all. Consequently, it’s all too easy for the current crop of demagogues, charlatans, and evil-doers to swoop in and convince people with anything that sounds remotely plausible like “intelligent design” or even totally implausible like miracles, faces-in-pizza-slices, hurricanes “punishing” people for “evil”, and so on.

Even people who might otherwise know their stuff about their own area of expertise are not immune to this — see the quiz the Guardian gave to some notable public figures in Britain about basic science facts, and see how poorly they did. In our daily lives, it might not matter if we know why salt dissolves in water or what the Second Law of Thermodynamics is, but our collective ignorance weakens our ability to resist the charismatic lures of the Willful Ignorant.

Check out this web page with a whole list of common misconceptions about basic science — stuff you thought you knew, but you really don’t. Or maybe you did when you were 8 or 9 years old, but have long since forgotten. I have to cop to not knowing the first one on the list myself, and these are all pretty obvious items.

Al Gore’s new book “The Assault On Reason”, takes on some of the other culprits — our over-entertained culture, the information overload from corporations and agenda-driven media organizations, and others — but I find a lot of power in the argument that we simply waste the power of education by misdirecting it. And I think it extends beyond the current battleground of science — how many Americans never learn a shred of history beyond what is taught to them in elementary school, with the result that the overwhelming majority of Americans do not have a realistic picture of the root causes of the Civil War, the political context of American intervention in World Wars I and II, or the misguided foreign policies of the Cold War that have led us to our current disastrous situation in Iraq.

Collectively, we’re getting more and more ignorant with each succeeding generation, and the damage is beginning to show. I’m on hiatus from heavy-duty ranting, so I’ll share this blogger’s screed with you because he sums it up so well.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Left, Right and Sideways

Sticking with today’s theme, let’s look at the 2008 presidential election and how that’s shaping up a bit.

In the current issue of The New Yorker, op-ed writer Hendrik Hertzberg takes a look at the front-loading of fundraising and the juggling of primary elections.

The current situation has seriously thrown the apple cart off the tracks. It’s almost assured that the re-organization of primary election dates will result in presumptive nominees being selected before the end of February, stretching the national campaign out for an extra six months. Six months of non-stop squabbling, spinning, oversaturated news coverage, and everything else we’ve come to dread about elections.

Hertzberg mentions a plan that was offered up by a group of Republicans prior to the 2004 election that would have re-organized the primaries in a way that would put the largest convention delegate grabs at the end of the season, giving all the candidates a fairer shot at winning support. The plan, Hertzberg says, was shot down by the RNC, intent on the coronation of Dubya without any competition.

Meanwhile, while the Democrats and Republicans are running headlong into an electoral debacle, here’s an interesting Salon profile of former Republican senator Bob Barr, who has actually left the party and has begun to position himself as a right-libertarian with enough national credibility to mount a third-party presidential campaign. Compared to the other right-libertarian candidate, Ron Paul, who is a first-rate wacko, Barr sounds almost electable. The left-libertarians continue to scurry about in total obscurity, but I hear there’s this guy called Al Gore who might be looking to make a comeback. Maybe he should pay a campaign visit to Vermont first.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site