Tag apollo 11

In Space, No One Can Hear You Tweet

In 1969, Astronaut Neil Armstrong slowly made his way down the ladder of his lunar landing craft then took a breathtaking leap to place the very first human footprint on the surface of another world. Billions of people sat transfixed in front of television sets all over the world waiting for him to speak. His words, so very carefully chosen in advance, instantly became a fixture of human history forever:

“That was one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind”

Yesterday, the communications software aboard the International Space Station was upgraded to provide direct access to the Internet. Astronaut T. J. Creamer took advantage of the technological advance to secure his own place in human history by posting the first unaided Tweet from outer space:

Centuries from now, the future slaps its collective forehead.

Mooning

columbia-320x240

Our summer vacation this year was a 10-day trip to Washington DC and Colonial Williamsburg. I can’t imagine that anyone who visits Washington for vacation doesn’t manage to stop at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Air and Space Museum, since it is one of the most popular tourist destinations in the world. Even as we first began to think about our trip, there was no question that it would be one of the must-do attractions, even if it meant missing something else as a consequence.

All of which makes it hard for me to say that it was probably the thing I liked the least of all the things we were able to do in the course of our visit. Perhaps my expectations were too high from nearly a lifetime of imagining what it would be like to visit in person. This was my very first trip to Washington DC, after all, and I’ve had a lot of years to imagine what all of these places were going to be like when I finally got to see them in person. But beyond that, it seemed to me that, unlike the other Smithsonian museums we visited, Air & Space was more like a children’s museum than a serious attempt to curate and present a collection of truly unique and predominantly American historical artifacts. I certainly appreciate the thinking behind making museums as fun learning experiences for children, and I also totally get why the Smithsonian went that way with Air & Space, but my own selfish interest made me actually resent it.

Having said that, though, there is one aspect of the museum which is utterly and undeniably heart-stopping: stepping into the main lobby of the building and seeing all those historical aircraft and spacecraft all in one place. The Spirit of St. Louis, Chuck Yeager’s “Glamorous Glennis” X-1, John Glenn’s “Friendship 7″ Mercury capsule, and the Mack Daddy of them all, the “Columbia” capsule of the Apollo 11 mission.

That’s it in the picture at the top of the post. It’s positioned somewhat inside the lobby so that it is one of the last things you come to on your way into the museum, and it’s frankly rather non-descript compared to the bright orange bullet of the X-1 or the rickety-looking Spirit of St. Louis. It’s completely encased in clear Lucite to keep the millions of little fingers that would otherwise despoil it away, but the exterior of the capsule is dirty brown with scorching from the heat of re-entry, making it look like a large, overused tagine casserole more than the first spacecraft to put humans on the moon. Every replica of an Apollo capsule I’ve ever seen has had the spiffy white, black and red paint job, not the look of one too many macaroni-and-cheese dinners spilled over.

Nevertheless, as soon as I genuinely realized what I was looking at, my whole body buzzed. This was not some model of a space capsule on display, a replica with pretend toggle switches for overstimulated kindergarteners to yank on ten thousand times a day and a worn-out video loop of Neil Armstrong’s “One Small Step” playing over and over. This…ohmygawd…THIS is the Real Thing. And for a second, I was six years old again myself.

Later that day, as we explored the Museum of American History, I started to get used to that feeling. Almost every single object you see in that museum is the Real Thing, and it seems like there is not an imaginable treasure of American history that they do not possess. When we saw the Star Spangled Banner, I actually had to sit down for a minute. But the first and best thrill was seeing that burned-up little capsule.

LEM-240x320

The museum is roughly divided into one half about space and the other half about aircraft. The space half has to content itself with mock-ups and replicas out of necessity. The original rockets, satellites, and such either remained in space or burned up on the way back down. All of the actual lunar modules that landed on the Moon are still there, of course (in fact, you’ve probably seen these new photos from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter just in the last couple of days). The LEM I am standing in front of in the photo above was actually built for use in the space program, but was surplussed after the Apollo program was cancelled. Even that degree of provenance, though, makes it a very weak sister to the three mission capsules in the lobby (Apollo, Mercury and Gemini), and it’s location down with the other mock-ups is an acknowledgment from SI that it really doesn’t count.

apollo8-240x320

Tucked away in a weird place, though, is ANOTHER real Apollo capsule, fastened to a wall just high enough to keep it out of reach of visitors so that it does not have to be sealed in plastic. If I remember the signage correctly, it is the Apollo 8 capsule that orbited the Moon during the Christmas before the Apollo 11 mission and told all of us enthralled little children on Earth that they had seen Santa Claus.

apollo8cu-320x240

The lack of protective Lucite and the angle at which the capsule is mounted to the wall give you a much better look inside the capsule than is possible with the Apollo 11 craft. The “couches” for the three astronauts look decidedly uncomfortable and reminded me more of Dick Cheney’s torture chambers than a ship that sailed to the moon and back.

Even though we’d like to go back to see Washington in a couple of years, I doubt I’ll bother with the Air & Space Museum again. Still, as we’ve all been reliving those exciting and tense moments of 40 years ago these last few days and watching the joyful giddiness of Walter Cronkite announcing the moon landing every time the news programs eulogize him, I’m genuinely gratified that I had the chance to see the Real Thing in person once in my life.

Two Small Steps

A lot of bloggers are reminding us that yesterday was the 63rd anniversary of the first successful nuclear test at the site now known as “Trinity” in the deserts of New Mexico. Usually, more attention is paid to the anniversaries of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which occurred just a couple of weeks later in early August, 1945, but for some reason this has caught the attention of the bloggers. Maybe it’s because of the opening sequence of “Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skulls”, which has Indy hiding in a lead-lined refrigerator and survivng a nuclear test (which, I hope, you do realize is totally impossible). If you’ve ever read much about the Manhattan Project, you’ll recall that at least one physicist was legitimately concerned that the test might cause the entire atmosphere of the planet to catch fire and destroy everyone. I’d like to see Indy escape from THAT. The test was successful, clearing the way for the assembly of the two bombs and for Harry Truman’s controversial decision to use them.

Meanwhile, Phil Plait reminded me that July 16 was also the 39th anniversary of the launch of Apollo 11, the first space mission to land men on the surface of the moon. I should have remembered, since I sat through the entire Discovery Channel miniseries “When We Left Earth” not too long ago, and just watched the documentary “In The Shadow Of The Moon” which also ran on Discovery. The miniseries was about the entire breadth of the manned space program from Mercury through the Space Shuttle, while the feature-length documentary was specifically about the Apollo Program. The miniseries got off to an interesting start, but, not unlike the manned space program itself, became monotonous and uninteresting after the segment about Apollo 13. The single documentary, on the other hand, had lots of interesting commentary from some of the less-famous members of the astronaut corps like Alan Bean and Gene Cernan, to make up for what was otherwise a standard rehash of the usual NASA film footage. They both looked mighty awesome on my big-screen TV, but that’s about that. I did get Charlotte to sit through “In The Shadow Of The Moon” with me, and she liked it.

I was not quite six years old in the summer of 1969, a couple of years younger than she is now, but I remember being glued to the TV day and night for Apollo 11, especially for the launch. While Walter Cronkite is the iconic figure of the television coverage of the space program, we were an NBC family, and so when I think of the moon missions, I think of Frank McGee at the anchor desk. Phil Plait had a really neat link in his post about the launch: this is a short video of the live television coverage in Australia. One of the things all of the astronauts mentioned in “In The Shadow Of The Moon” was how the entire world seemed to adopt the Apollo astronauts and how people thought of the moon landing not as an American accomplishment, but as a HUMAN accomplishment. “We Came In Peace, For All Mankind”, the plaque said, and for that one time in history maybe it was true.

One Giant Leap

NeilArmstrongMoon.jpg

Today is the 38th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. I was not quite Charlotte’s age in July of 1969, but I remember watching as much of this as my parents would let me, hunkered down in their bedroom in front of the little television they had in there.

Funny, I don’t remember it happening like this (YouTube, lots of profanity), but I was pretty little at the time.

Relatedly, this story talks about a recent meeting-of-minds among various engineering and science teams who are contributing to the early phases of designing a manned mission to Mars. It’s the first time anyone hs gotten them together to talk about the difficulties in designing the landing system that will be required. Mars presents some challenges that previous space programs haven’t had to deal with — primarily, landing a very heavy orbiter in a very thin atmosphere and getting everybody inside the craft safely on the surface. The fact that 60% of all unmanned missions to Mars have failed to land successfully isn’t terribly encouraging, but they’ve got some interesting ideas.

Comments:
Oh, come on, Brian! We all know that the moon landing is a hoax! ;)
Posted by Sarah [URL] on 07/20/07

Don’t go there with me, girlfriend! ;-p

I’ll go all Buzz Aldrin on the first person who tries to tell me the moon landing was a “hoax”.
Posted by Brian [URL] on 07/20/07

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress