Tag Atheism

Atheist In A Foxhole

You are, I’m sure, familiar with the expression “there are no atheists in foxholes”, but it’s a statement dripping with irony, because while the implication is that deep down everybody is really a believer, the actual meaning is that in moments of terror people will say or do ANYTHING to save themselves, regardless of how it fits with their normal worldview. In other words, what it really demonstrates is the hypocrisy of espousing a religious viewpoint in a moment of mortal weakness, not the “underlying inevitability” of religious belief. You know, sort of how like torture will make people say anything to make it stop…a sort of Spanish Inquisition, if you will. (insert obligatory Monty Python clip here)

To wit, the story of this New Hampshire fellow, a World War II veteran named (amusingly enough) Milton Christian, who was recently awarded the Bronze Star for his military service — an award that was held up for decades due to red tape. His heroism earned him a chest-full of other military decorations, too, but as he reminisced about the horror of being in combat, he explained that it was the very experience of being trapped in a foxhole that made him come to the conclusion that there is no god:

“Some things you forget; other things stay with you and you replay them over and over again in your mind, like it was yesterday,” he said, closing his eyes.

“The very first time I heard artillery fire, I’ll never forget the sound, the whistling that filled the air. You dive in a hole, smoke rising all around you. There were six or seven of us together that day, and as soon as it’s over, you look around to make sure everyone is still alive. That time, we all made it,” Christian said. “That is your baptism.”

“They say there are no atheists in foxholes. But as we sat in those holes, praying that God would save us, I thought about the fact that the other side was doing the same thing. And then I wondered if God is just playing some kind of game with us. Pretty much I decided at that point there was no God,” Christian said.

“For the rest of my life, I’ve tried to do the right thing. I raised a beautiful bunch of kids — and they truly are my greatest accomplishment. So I’m not worried about what’s next. If there is a God, I think he’ll know that I just did the best I could. That’s all a man can do.”

I am reminded of another aphorism, too:

See Also

An Apology

A former Christian publicly apologizes for being a shit-head for all those years.

Money quote:

3. I apologize to all my former Sunday school students because I taught you that the bible was the word of god. I perpetuated a myth that the bible is a special book that should be regarded ‘much more highly than it ought’. I encouraged you to trust this book, to think this book contained sacred ideas about life and god. I made you think that the stories in the bible were intrinsically valuable and could teach you about how god works and who god is. I apologize for always referring to god as a ‘he’, thereby further anthropomorphizing a pretend deity and making you think ‘he’ was real and decidedly masculine. I apologize for teaching you to think that you were a sinner and that Jesus had to die for you when you are really just a beautiful child, perfect in every way from the minute you were born (except for when you aren’t). I apologize for telling you that Jesus conquered death and that you should put your trust in him when there is not a shred of evidence of the resurrection except for what is in the bible. I apologize for not respecting your intelligence and glazing over thorny issues and rationalizing all the bullshit that is so present at all times in ‘god’s word’. (I apologize for saying bullshit in this apology). I apologize for ever calling the bible ‘god’s word’. It isn’t ‘god’s word’. It’s just a book. There are a lot of other much better books. There are books that helped humanity move beyond misogyny and slavery and tyranny. There are books that led to scientific discoveries which led to medicine and helpful machines and made the world a better place. None of those books are in the bible. In fact, the bible helps people to justify misogyny and tyranny and slavery and the bible made church leaders fear science and so they burned scientists and doctors and smart people because what those smart people were learning was often in direct conflict with what the bible and the church taught. I apologize for not telling you that the bible and christianity are two of the main reasons that it took people so long to move from tyranny into democracy, from slavery to human rights, from cruel religious mandates to civil law. I hope someday you will figure that out for yourselves in spite of what I taught you.

The unfortunate thing is that she gets so much Christian hate-mail, she’s shut off the comments on her blog, so I guess they haven’t exactly accepted her apology.

See Also

The Militant Atheist

He also posted a transcript of this on his blog

See Also

Reality Checking Your Belief System

Hemant Mehta, a.k.a. “The Friendly Atheist” points to this post at a blog written by a Christian minister which offers a little reality check that religious people might want to test against from time to time in order to have a better sense of whether or not their belief system actually incorporates the ideas of tolerance and compassion that they hold up as hallmarks of their respective dogmas. Mehta quite correctly points out that this particular self-assessment is as useful for atheists and other non-believers, since those particular qualities are also often touted by us as well, and are, quite honestly, often equally abused in the struggle to achieve acceptance.

Here is the set of questions:

1. Do I truly believe that everyone has the right to their own beliefs or lack thereof?
2. Can I respect the person, even though I may not respect their ideas?
3. Do I have the capacity to recognize my own fallacies?
4. Will it kill me if I were wrong?
5. Am I able to hold what I believe is truth lightly in the interest of dialog?
6. Can I overlook and maybe even appreciate the idiosyncrasies of others in order to hear what they have to say?
7. Am I willing to discern the deeper currents rather than being distracted by the surface ripples?
8. Can everyone play? In other words, will I not ostracize someone because of their beliefs or lack thereof?
9. Is personal harm to others the only prohibition I am willing to make?
10. Do I love all beings, and if not, am I willing?

At the pastor’s blog, I note that in the comments there are some people who seem to see this as a yes/no situation rather than the starting point for serious evaluation and dialog, so I’d suggest to readers here that you don’t barrel-ass through them yourself as if this were one of the little quizzes we are so fond of, but to think about them. As I spent a little time doing that myself, I tried to be honest and not just toss off one-word answers, with the result that I find myself thinking a little bit more about the last two questions and how they apply to my own worldview.

See Also

More Of That Famous “Christian Tolerance”

In my recent post about the latest big round of billboards promoting atheism, my blog-buddy Adam Gaffin pointed out that the campaign was also active here in the Boston area.

And this is how the Christians responded:

atheism-vandalism
(via The Friendly Atheist)

But it could have been worse. In Cincinnati, the billboard company who sold space to the Cinncinnati CoR group was forced to move the sign to a different location because they were receiving death threats. As luck would have it, though, the billboard was moved to a more prominent location, so the threats sort of backfired in terms of shouting down the message.

The Friendly Atheist also recently had this post with a collection of most of the different public message campaigns that have occurred in the past year, beginning with the now-famous bus ads in the U.K. Meanwhile, this site has been collecting some of the “rebuttals” from Christian groups like these charmers:

christian-billboard

christian-billboard2

Can you feel the love?

See Also

Follow-Up: Good Without God

atheism0

Thanks to Shelley for alerting me that last night’s edition of the local TV newsmagzine “Chronicle” featured Harvard Humanist Chaplain Greg Epstein, whom I blogged about recently in conjunction with the various atheist billboard campaigns around the country. I was busy helping Charlotte do her homework, so I didn’t watch the show, but WCVB’s website has the entire thing on its website in easy-to-digest segments.

I’ve just finished watching the first segment, which lets Epstein get in a nice plug for his new book, and features a typical Boston-area yuppie couple who are atheists themselves but still want all the trapping of a traditional religious experience for their daughter — a “naming ceremony”, Christmas, etc. Epstein lays out the central conceit of Humanism — you can have all the warm fuzzy lovies of belonging to a church without all that silly God/Jesus stuff. The ideal message for people who are smart enough to realize that nobody needs all that superstition, but who can’t quite bring themselves to let go of their middle-class American upbringing. It’s the same marketing device that the Unitarian Universalists use to a large degree: “Come for the company, stay for the moralizing.”

Yes, I am being too cynical about that by half, I know, but c’mon kids. If it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck, and sounds like a duck…well, you know. Believe it or not, though, I am sympathetic to the promotion of Secular Humanism because one of the things that traditional religions highlight is the ability to provide a community of like-minded people to share consensual meaning and context. A lot of people simply need that to make their worldview work. If Humanism can impart context and assert the validity of non-belief as a worldview, then good for them; my concern is that by doing so, organized Humanist communities will, over time, develop the same bigotries, exclusionary tenets, and transference of presumed divinity that Christian churches have. I like my atheism like I like my sushi: raw, fresh, and with a big dollop of wasabi to clear out my head.

See Also

God, Or The Lack Thereof

Just a few random things I’ve collected recently:

bizarro-atheist-cafe

Again and again, the artist who calls himself “QualiaSoup” does a splendid job of using the power of logic in a visual and comprehensible way to undo the specious arguments made by believers that is utterly unassailable and yet neither off-putting nor inflammatory. Here’s the latest one making the rounds, wherein he addresses the notion of “faith” and simply dismembers it with Vulcan-like logic and reason:

Then there’s this thought from Penn Jillette, which makes a more emotional pitch:

“If you believe the Pope really is infallible in giving us the word of God, and you believe the God he speaks for does not approve of gay sex, does not want condoms used to help control the spread of AIDS or to stop women from giving birth to unwanted babies . . . maybe if you have humanity and compassion, if you have morality and a conscience, if you still believe that there really is a God really pulling the Pope’s strings, that God might not be the kind of God you want to worship.”

He brings up a couple of touchstone terms — “morality” and “conscience”. Religious believers like to insist that atheists can’t be moral or have a conscience because we don’t subscribe to their faith-based world-view. This is, of course, utter bullshit, and Jillette does a nice job of turning that particular canard back on them. So does “Ebonmusings” in this recent post at Daylight Atheism. My online buddy Jack Cluth makes his point a little more archly:

miss-number-one

See Also

Copyright © BrianKaneOnline

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress