Tag Benazir Bhutto

Exporting American-Style Democracy, I See

Okay…never held political office, irresponsible playboy married into wealth, accused of corruption but no one could produce the smoking gun, and backed by the Bush Administration…why it must be the new President of Pakistan!

Proving that even after half a century of putting guys like Saddam Hussein into power, only to regret the decision a few years later, the U.S. has thrown its complete support behind the husband of assassinated Pakistani political leader Benazir Bhutto, Asif Ali Zardari. Though it’s been pretty damn hard to find out what’s been going on in the Real World all summer between Michael Phelps, Sarah Palin and hurricane season, you may have briefly heard that Our Sainted Ally in the Global War On Terror, Pervez Musharraf was pressured into resigning his office a couple of weeks ago and that there was much debate about whether to impeach him if he didn’t step down. It’s still believed that Mushy was behind the killing of Bhutto last year, and that he is playing fast and loose with the Americans and the Taliban, all while squashing constitutional rule in Pakistan. You know, basic tenets of democracy as defined by the Bush Administration.

Well now they’ve got themselves quite a winner with Zardari. He’s known as “Mr. Ten Percent” in Islamabad for insisting on skimming every deal he touches and using the money to build and maintain his palatial residences in England. Much of the criticism levelled at Benzair Bhutto came from simply being married to this scumbag and personally benefitting from his corrupt ways. This article at The Atlantic by Robert D. Kaplan lays out ther story of Asif Ali Zardari, and if the guy weren’t already setting up shop in the Presidential Palace in Pakistan, he would have made a GREAT substitute for Sarah Palin on the Republican ticket.

I have no doubt that if McCain wins, we’ll be up to our necks with this guy for a long time. If Obama wins…well, time will tell, but I’d say it’s a 50-50 proposition that we’ll still be supporting him in 2009. We just never seem to learn from our foreign policy mistakes.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Stop The Presses!

PARADE Cover 1/6/08

If your Sunday newspaper carries Parade Magazine, then you saw this on the cover yesterday. The interview with Benazir Bhutto took place in October, and obviously the magazine went to print well in advance of December 27, the date of her assassination.

I don’t know what their excuse is, frankly, because most news magazines are able to make editorial changes as late as 24 hours before press these days thanks to the advent of using computers and desktop publishing software to layout their issues. I’ve seen various Time-Warner mags have next-day coverage of some events (as in the event happened Sunday and showed up in the magazine I received in the mail on Monday). By contrast, Parade’s own website was able to tag the interview with a brief blurb about the timing and their decision to run the story. They posted the interview on the web immediately after the news broke, as a matter of fact.

This just makes the dead-tree media look bad. Remember the egg on the face of the editors at Elle when their interview with Lindsay Lohan hit the news stands the same day she was arrested for DUI? At least that had some ironic value to it. This just comes across as out-of-touch.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Must-Read Links

Link-dump in progess! Here are a bunch of things I’ve seen posted around the web over the last week or so that don’t really tie together in any particular way but are too worthwhile to miss. Take notes, you will be quizzed on this material later.

1. Former Dateline reporter John Hockenberry has left NBC and joined the MIT Media Lab as a professor. He has written this article for MIT’s Technology Review about his disillusionment with the content biases in the major news operations. Every place I’ve seen it linked, it has been described as “scathing”, but it also needs to be described as “disheartening” and, sadly, as “unsurprising”.

2. Science fiction writer and all-around genius guy Bruce Sterling gave his annual “State Of The World” Q&A on the community site “The Well” this week. Just the introductory post by forum moderator Jon Lebkowsky would be worth reading on its own for its summation of the “state of the world”, but Sterling has a lot to say about terrorism, the collapse of nation-states, the impending ecological holocaust, and a couple of other interesting tangents. The dialogue is not over — people are still posting questions and he is still responding — but what’s been posted already is excellent reading.

3. This just about made me blow a gasket yesterday: a judge in New Jersey has ordered an atheist couple to relinquish custody of their adopted daughter because they do not believe in God. His reasoning is that they are depriving the baby from “…the inestimable privilege of worshiping Almighty God in a manner agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience.” The couple and the ACLU have appealed the decision to the New Jersey Supreme Court. Very honestly, I am chilled to the bone by the title of the article — “Can Atheists Be Parents?” — let alone the actual court ruling. Has the Christian Right’s goal of turning this country into a theocratic authoritarian state succeeded to the extent that I need to fear that my child might be taken from me by an overzealous judge because my personal beliefs do not match someone’s prescribed belief in God?

4. Shamed by the news reports of the video of Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, the Pakistan government has backed off their earlier story about the cause of her death, but now there is the report that Bhutto had an appointment later that same day with Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman Patrick Kennedy where she planned to deliver to them a copy of a report showing that the Musharraf government has been funneling American aid intended for “fighting terrorism” into efforts to rig the now-postponed January 8 election. In other words, she may have been about to give the American politicians the very smoking gun that killed her.

5. I think we’ve pretty clearly established the degree to which TSA airport security measures are nothing more than “security theater”, but just in case you still had any doubts, they should be wiped away once and for all by this blog post by Patrick Smith in last week’s NYT “Jetlagged”. Smith is a former airline pilot who also writes the “Ask The Pilot” column at Salon, and has plenty of first-hand experience with the “follies” of airport security.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

She Bumped Her Head And Couldn’t Get Up In The Morning

On the off-chance that you haven’t been watching much news over the long weekend…

The “official” cause of Benazir Bhutto’s death was announced by the Pakistan government on Friday as being due to bumping her head on the door handle of the SUV she was riding in after “someone from al-Quaeda” detonated a bomb.

So, I guess this video of someone firing four shots at point-blank range directly at her head is just a red herring, eh?

And if anyone really believes the “al Quaeda did it” story, I’d suggest they catch the first plane to Baghdad and start looking for all those Weapons of Mass Destruction, because both of those stories come from the same Mother Goose. Once again, the American penchant for backing The Wrong Guy is biting them squarely in the ass.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Benazir Bhutto

Bhutto's Last Moments

The photo above was taken just moments before Benazir Bhutto was assassinated today in Pakistan. Personally, I am stunned to think that she would expose herself as a target that way, but I suspect that she understood the risk. Surely no one can be surprised by this turn of events.

I’ve been trying to follow a variety of discussions around the Internet about the incident. So far this MetaFilter thread is pretty good if you ignore the usual nonsense going on. In that thread a couple of people have linked to this recent London Review of Books article by Tariq Ali which offers quite a bit of background on the Bhutto family and their role in Pakistani politics for the last 30 years or so.

It doesn’t take much intelligence to realize that the assassination is the work of the ISI (the Pakistan secret police) either with the direct approval or knowledge of Pervez Musharraf. The other major political figure in Pakistani presidential politics, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has already publicly accused Musharraf, as have some of Bhutto’s supporters in her party. Musharraf has taken quite a gamble that the army can outlast the rioters and that the situation won’t devolve into outright insurrection. He probably doesn’t have to worry too much, since we just gave him $300 million in aid, $50 million of which was specifically for military use.

Ironically, Bhutto had gone back to Pakistan at the behest of the U.S., which wanted to use her as a bit of political leverage against Musharraf. She might yet be useful as a martyr, but Musharraf has to most to gain from this situation by consolidating his own power a bit more, making him that much harder for the Americans to push around.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site