Tag Bernie Sanders

Aux Armes, Citroyens!

In honor of Bastille Day, it’s worth taking a moment to consider the situation in which we find ourselves in this country today.

Speaking at the protests of the G20 summit in Toronto, Canadian activist Maude Barlow reminded the gathered crowd that the three richest men in the world have more money than the 48 poorest COUNTRIES in the world. Just let that sink into your brain for a second. Overall, the richest 2% of the world’s population controls over half of the wealth, and the bottom 50% control less than 1% of the wealth.

Sucks to be them, right? Well, you’re most likely one of them, too. If you’ve got some time, this rant by Hofstra University political science professor David Michael Green brings home the reality of how the redistribution of wealth away from the middle class is on the brink of turning this country into another Argentina or Brazil, where a tiny percentage of elites control the wealth and the vast majority of people live in the worst slums imaginable. If you can’t be bothered to read the whole thing (and it is quite a stemwinder), at least read this paragraph:

The product of these efforts has been precisely what one would expect. Corporations and economic elites have grown fantastically more wealthy than they already were thirty years ago. Their tax liabilities are now negligible and sometimes less than zero. Massive national debt, the product in part of those tax gifts to the rich, plus huge bills for interest on that debt (this alone is one of the largest items in the federal budget each year), is now owned by the mass public, who got nickels and dimes worth of tax cuts, in exchange for which they will now have to literally work years of their lives to pay down the taxes the rich escaped. Working people across the country get less and pay more for everything today. College is becoming increasingly out of the financial reach of average Americans. The minimum wage, which actually often isn’t the minimum, is far from a sustainable salary for one person, let alone a family. As of 2004, the richest one percent of Americans possessed sixty percent of all wealth in the country, while the bottom forty percent accounted for a whopping two-tenths of a percent. Between 1979 and 2004, after-tax income for the top one percent of Americans rose by 176 percent, while for those in the bottom 20 percent that figure rose only six percent. And those figures are for six years ago, during what by current standards was flush times for working people. Now jobs are disappearing, with the inevitable effect of driving wages down further, not to mention all the obvious effects on prosperity, security, health, mental health and sheer longevity.

Here’s a graph to help you visualize that:

Writing in The Nation, Harvard economist and former Labor Secretary Robert Reich says that this widening gap is at the very heart of the Great Recession, just as it was in 1929. In 1928, the richest 1% of Americans received 23.8% of income earned in the U.S., and in 2007 that figure was 23.5%, aided by tax cuts and shifting tax burdens that consistently favored the rich while gutting the middle-class. Again, Reich’s article isn’t a quick read, so here’s a good pullquote:

If nothing more is done, America’s three-decade-long lurch toward widening inequality is an open invitation to a future demagogue who misconnects the dots, blaming immigrants, the poor, government, foreign nations, “socialists” or “intellectual elites” for the growing frustrations of the middle class. The major fault line in American politics will no longer be between Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives. It will be between the “establishment” and an increasingly mad-as-hell populace determined to “take back America” from them. When they understand where this is heading, powerful interests that have so far resisted reform may come to see that the alternative is far worse.

Need some quant porn to flesh it out? Look at this post at Calculated Risk that compares the current unemployment situation to previous economic downturns. The graph below is too small to read here, so be sure to look at the original, but I think even at the reduced size you get the point:

Boston College law professor Ray D. Madoff (apparently no relation) calls the end of the estate tax and the continuation of other elite-friendly tax laws nothing less than the enabling conditions to create an American aristocracy, even as some super-rich individuals like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates themselves have called for their class to give away their fortunes to the betterment of society.

While Reich is quick (and correct) to point out that the Democrats are just as equally to blame for the situation as the Republicans, it never ceases to amaze me that the current crop of Republicans has stopped even pretending that they have any other agenda, and that President Obama and the Democratic leadership in Congress will compliantly go right along with it, without so much as a peep from anyone other than “Give ‘Em Hell” Bernie Sanders (the only ACTUAL socialist in Washington, I hasten to add).

It is more than painfully clear that there is little that can be done within the existing political structure to reverse the situation, and that the only agent of change will be class warfare on the size and scope of the three major proletarian revolutions. The real remaining question is how much worse will things have to get for the middle-class populations of the U.S. and Europe — will nothing happen until every major city resembles Mumbai or Rio de Janeiro? I think the answer lies in how quickly things transpire; if things level off for a decade or two, the complacent population of America and Europe are not likely to rise up, even as our way of life is inexorably assaulted. A few sharper shocks, and maybe we’ll get some sense kicked into us.

See Also

Still A Few Good Guys Left

The country lost another great legislator with the passing of Robert Byrd this week, but fortunately there remain a few dedicated individuals whose first priority remains the average citizen and not the corporate one:

Dennis Kucinich on the giant fraud being perpetrated on this country called the Afghanistan War:

(and similarly here at the Huffington Post)

Bernie Sanders on Republican stonewalling on unemployment benefits while demanding the end of the estate tax, which benefits only the wealthiest of Americans:

Russ Feingold on the gutting of the Wall Street reform legislation:

and also at Huffington Post.

It’s reassuring that for every Scott Brown, Mitch McConnell, Michelle Bachmann or Joe Barton there is still someone who can cut through the bullshit. It’s disappointing that these men are so few in the halls of power, and more disappointing still that the man in the White House does not stand with them.

See Also

Linkapalooza 03/06/09 – The Economy

To go along with my rant, here are some linky items about the economy:



We’ll start with this illustrated audio clip of Franklin Roosevelt speaking in front of Madison Square Garden in 1936, as he was running for his second term (via Crooks & Liars). Though there are some crying “enough” with the comparisons of Barack Obama to Franklin Roosevelt, the simple reality is that there is a great deal to compare, if not in the men themselves, then certainly in the situations they found themselves in as they took office. By 1936, the initial efforts of the Roosevelt administration to resolve the banking crisis had been successful, and he was trying to move forward with the broader stimulus efforts of the New Deal, and yet FDR was still faced with stubborn do-nothing opposition from the Republican Party. Roosevelt, however, recognized the position he was in as one of strength and used it to clobber the Republicans into near-total irrelevance for the next dozen years. A certain secret Muslim non-American Communist terrorist gun-hating bomb-thrower-loving scary black man I can think of ought to be keeping this in mind.


One of the key players in the Roosevelt Administration was Secretary of Labor Francis Perkins. Perkins had served under FDR while he was governor of New York as the state’s Commissioner of Industry and had fought for many reforms to the state: minimum wage laws, capping the number of work hours in a week for women, and unemployment insurance among them. She was the first woman to hold a cabinet position and was one of only two members of FDR’s cabinet to serve for the entire duration of his presidency. As Secretary of Labor, it was her agenda that led to the creation of Social Security and federal minimum-wage laws. Writing at Tina Brown’s Daily Beast, University of Chicago historian Christine Stansell reviews a new biography of Perkins that tries to expand on the personal side of Perkins’ life more than the professional, but Perkins is not generally well-known in modern times so any book about her remakrable accomplishments is worth a look.


Here’s Captain Obvious with a bulletin for you: Advertising Age reports that the struggling economy and huge increase in the number of people out of work has been a serious boom for job-hunter social networking site LinkedIn. They’ve doubled their monthly number of visitors over this time last year, snagging 7.7 million visitors per month, and presently have 36 million registered users. Now, by comparison, Facebook has over 90 million members, but most of them are already employed and spending their days goofing off playing on Facebook.

Just in case you missed it, on Tuesday the New York Times editorial board came right out and said what a lot of us have been saying lately: it’s time for President Obama to stop bailing out the banks, nationalize them temporarily, eliminate the bad ones, stabilize the good ones, and tell the fucking Republicans to STFU about “socialism”. If it were me, I’d also fire Timothy Geithner and find somebody to run Treasury who wasn’t beholden to Wall Street, and then I’d sharpen up my guillotine and start publicly executing some bank executives, but I guess that’s why Obama’s the president and not me.

Everybody’s favorite “jealous putz”, the junior senator from Vermont, Bernie Sanders, wasn’t very happy with the non-answers he was getting from Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben “Bailout” Bernanke about where the money was going, so now he’s proposing legislation to force the Fed to disclose the names of institutions they have lent money to since March 2008 and provide full details about the amounts and the rationales for making said loans. Bernie’s website includes the text of the legislation and a video clip of him chewing on Bernanke’s ass.


Lastly, I’m sure you remember that I have posted a couple of times about the severity of the economic situation in Iceland. Iceland, Latvia, and a few other small nations have been hit especially hard because their tiny economies were not capable of withstanding the strain from the failures of their national banks due to overzealous speculation. The government in Iceland collapsed recently (with the unintended and somewhat irrelevant side effect of bringing to power the world’s first openly lesbian prime minister), people are beginning to protest with pitchforks and torches (literally), and it’s looking like Iceland will have to adopt the Euro as its currency, because the Icelandic krona is now worthless (take THAT Zimbabwe!).

The latest issue of Vanity Fair has a fantastic in-depth feature piece by journalist Michael Lewis about what’s going on in Iceland these days and how they screwed the pooch in the first place. Turns out it’s all the fault of the men, who basically still act like drunken Vikings on shore leave. And, in case you’re wondering, everybody in Iceland DOES know Björk, so shut up about it.
,

See Also

Buddy, Can You Spare $18 Billion?

A few links about the neverending clusterfuck we have gotten ourselves into economically:

Harvard professor and darling-of-the-right Niall Ferguson gave this interview to Vanity Fair, where he asserts that the United States really has no choice but to walk away from its colossal foreign debt, because the only other option is complete collapse. He makes a few other salient points along the way, most notably that China is also completely fucked because of us and can’t really do anything about it economically, but absolutely has the upper hand on any diplomatic disputes that might arise for a long, long time to come. Coincidentally, he’s plugging his new book The Ascent of Money, which he says he planned to have published just as the entire world economy fell into the shitter, since that’s a GREAT way to sell books.

But it looks like he’s not talking out of his ass on this. This article on a financial news website called Seeking Alpha offers pretty much the same conclusions as Ferguson’s, albeit in more technical financial jargon (via Polymeme). The whole damn country is about to miss its mortgage payment, and when that happens you’ll be using your 401(k) statements for toilet paper. So don’t go calling Cash4Gold.com just yet.

Meanwhile, I think a lot of people are still trying to pick their jaws up off the floor over the reports of $18 BILLION dollars being handed out to Wall Street executives using our precious “bailout” money. Not to mention the daily stream of stories about banks spending millions on stadium naming rights, the BofA CEO with the multimillion-dollar decorating bill, and other such rubbing-your-nose-in-it shenanigans. At The Seminal, contributor Chris Edelson did a little quick math to come up with some of the other things we could have done with that $18B besides piss it away on the bailout. For example, the S-CHIP bill, which was passed by both houses of Congress last week (and was vetoed TWICE by George Bush) will add $32 billion per year to a program that already costs $25 billion per year. The bailout bonus money could have paid for that increase for two years running without the increase in cigarette taxes which will be the funding mechanism.

Now, some regular visitors here don’t much like Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, but I think he’s one of the best representatives any state in America could ask for. Like a lot of us, Bernie is simply PISSED OFF about the bailout and the flagrant contempt with which the Wall Street criminals are raping this country. Last week, Bernie sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry “Gutless Wonder” Reid demanding that the Senate begin investigations into the disbursement and use of TARP funds. President Obama’s “salary cap” proposal is a first step, but a laughable one when you consider the scope of the fraud being committed, and nothing short of an investigating committee with a freshly-sharpened guillotine is going to have any real impact.

Regular readers know that I have posted a couple of times about the economic disaster as it has played out in Iceland, and you probably heard that the government there fell, as well as the story about the new prime minister being a lesbian (which, like Obama being black is all well and good but not particularly relevant at this moment in history). But next on the chopping block is Latvia, where rioting nearly brought down the government last week. The problems in Latvia are strikingly similar to those in Iceland, but a compounding issue for the Balkan country is that a third of the population is Russian, and they are agitating over what they call discrimination against them. That, in turn, could give Russia an excuse to cause trouble, if it so chose.

And while those two cold northern countries are struggling, so is the “Las Vegas of the Arab World”, Dubai. Unlike Iceland and Latvia, though, Dubai’s troubles all come from their overheated real estate speculation. This post at The Daily Clarity outlines the heart of the problem, which has manifested itself in the rapid departure of hundreds of ex-pat workers and businessmen who were fueling the Dubai land grabs. They point to this Times of London article about the recent phenomenon of luxury cars being abandoned at Dubai’s international airport by businessmen getting out while the getting is good. I’m actually a little surprised that American businessmen haven’t started pulling the same shit, but maybe they’re waiting for those bailout bonus checks to clear first.

See Also

Fuck Yeah, Bernie!

This is the new portrait of Dubya that was recently unveiled at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery. It’s the first time the National Portrait Gallery has ever exhibited portraits of the sitting President and First Lady (and I mean “sitting” as in “incumbent”, not “sitting” as in “seated”, even though they are both seated in the pictures).

Our Hero, Senator Bernie Saunders of Vermont, has wasted no time in firing off an angry letter to the National Picture Gallery to complain. Not about displaying the portraits, but about what he feels are inaccurate and deceptive statements in the description plaques next to the portraits. The description of the portrait of Dubya includes a statement to the effect that the September 11, 2001 attacks “led to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq”. Bernie has pointed out to the NPG that:

When President Bush and Vice President Cheney misled our country into the war in Iraq, they certainly cited the attacks on September 11, along with the equally specious claim that Iraq possessed vast arsenals of weapons of mass destruction. The notion, however, that 9/11 and Iraq were linked, or that one “led to” the other, has been widely and authoritatively debunked … Might I suggest that a reconsideration of the explanatory text next to the portrait of President Bush is in order.

Here’s a link to a PDF of the entire letter, courtest of Bernie’s own website.

It’s a minor point compared with some of the other efforts to buff up Dubya’s image, but history is in the details, and it’s the little mistakes that make the big lies believable. Given ‘em hell, Bernie!

See Also

It’s Good To Be A Liberal

Only eight more shopping days until Election Day, kids! I’m going to make a sincere effort this week to post about things other than You-Know-What, but to do that I have to get all of these links out of my system.

Recently, I read someone saying somewhere that people might be surprised at what genuinely nice individuals most politicians are. That the majority of people who go into professional politics do so out of a genuine desire to be of service to other people, regardless of their ideology. Republicans AND Democrats alike — contrary to the vicious rhetoric currently employed by the Republicans. Sometimes that commitment to public service gets obscured by personal ambitions and political obligations, but not always. I think there’s no question that Barack Obama is one of those people who has held on to his personal sense of service, and I hope he is able to continue to do so after he assumes the office of President.

This brief article in the Washington Post’s Sunday magazine lets Dennis Kucinich explain his mission in his own words, and here again you can grasp the sincere desire to help other people, especially people who otherwise have no one to help them. That, friends, is the heart of liberalism (or “progressivism”, if you’re a wimp). Kucinich was practically alone among the Democratic candidates in staking his claim firmly in progressive soil, while Clinton and Obama wrestled over who could be the most like the Republicans. This was and is my biggest qualm with Obama — that while he is a decent person, he is too easily swayed by the political wind. I do not have that sense at all about Dennis Kucinich, and that is why he’ll get my vote next week and why I will continue to support him in the future. The now-embryonic Obama Administration would do well indeed to find a place for Dennis Kucinich and foster his political future so that he might have a realistic chance at the White House eight years hence.

This is Bernie Sanders, the independent Senator from Vermont. Bernie (he prefers to be called “Bernie”) has been in the Senate since the Democrats regained control of Congress in 2006, but he had been Vermont’s single representative in the House for 16 years before that. Bernie’s political affiliation is one of the most interesting ones in modern American politics. He’s listed as an “independent”, caucuses with (and votes with) the Democrats, and describes himself as a Socialist. Indeed, in his earlier days prior to being elected mayor of the city of Burlington, VT, he was a member of an anti-war fringe party, the very sort that William Ayers was involved with (minus the bombs, I guess).

During the years of Alan Greenspan’s chairmanship of the Federal Reserve, Bernie was a vocal critic of Greenspan. At the time, Greenspan was widely considered as a near-magical figure by Washington leaders, able to keep the long boom of the Clinton years rolling along with a single well-directed word in his oracular statements to Congress. Last week, Greenspan, now retired, returned to Congress, hat in hand, to admit that he had “made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organisations, specifically banks and others, were such that they were best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms”. This is what Bernie had to say about that.

Bernie Sanders has also been among the few progressive voices (along with Kucinich) speaking out agains the Wall Street bailout, and calling quite vocally for the sort of reforms and public service programs that Franklin Roosevelt enacted at the beginning of his administration. Give ‘em hell, Bernie!

The only part of this summer’s Democratic National Convention that I watched was the night that Ted Kennedy spoke. The man pulled himself out of a hospital bed, was wheeled into the arena, and lifted himself from a wheelchair to walk to the podium to make that speech. The reports from his family continue to be positive, but there could not have been anyone who heard that speech who did not know in their hearts that it would be the last convention speech he’ll make.

Ted Kennedy still plans to return to the floor of the Senate when it reconvenes in January, and it does seem that he will make good on his pledge. The Washington Times (you know, the one run by the Moonies) ran this story last week that describes how Teddy is spending his recuperation time: by crafting a vast piece of legislation to bring his life-long goal of universal health care to the floor of the Senate. While both Barack Obama and John McCain have health care proposals in their platforms, both are fundamentally flawed in many ways. I think there’s more than a little reason to be afraid that President Obama would try to move quickly on his program, putting the issue to bed with a lackluster approach that will haunt us for decades. People who have met with Kennedy to discuss his plan call it a much better alternative to Obama’s plan; it has buy-in from all the assorted interests, and an Obama representative has been kept in the loop as a way to entice Obama to embrace this plan over his own.

This is the most important cause of Kennedy’s long political career, and perhaps the single greatest domestic issue facing this country other than the Wall Street meltdown. The sense is that many in Washington are willing to take this on seriously. One of the executives who runs the AARP says that the prevailing feeling is “Let’s do it for Ted.”

Amen to that.

See Also

Let’s Make A Deal

The bailout bill went down to defeat in the House of Representatives this afternoon, with the Republicans trying to pin the blame on Nancy Pelosi for making a speech that they say drove away Republican votes. It’s good to see that the Republicans still have the presence of mind to try to spin some political points out of the imminent meltdown of the world economy, but I scarcely think that Pelosi’s speech had anything to do with it. The Republicans are trying to have their cake and eat it too by voting down this bill. Their sudden insistence on “free market principles” was nowhere in sight as they bailed out Fannie MAE, Freddie MAC and AIG, but now they don’t want to be seen handing over the keys to the gate long after the horses have already left the barn. The fact that the general public is still about 3-to-1 AGAINST a bailout bill probably has a lot more to do with it. Even the Dems didn’t all vote for it, which I think is worth noticing. The leadership needed to pass a bill, so they took the least-terrible set of compromises they could come up with, but they still couldn’t get everyone on board. Dennis Kucinich, for example, voted against the bill. So did my Congressman, John Tierney Here’s the complete roll call.

It’s not hard to find a lot of well-qualified people who are ready to line up and say that the original Paulson bill was unacceptable, but even the “compromise” bill worked on over the weekend has seen nothing but tepid support. At this stage, not passing the first thing to hit the floor is probably the best thing that could happen. Another bill will have to push a little bit more, even if the Republican reluctance is a cynical ploy. The weak-willed and useless Democratic leadership should be looking for something more than an overnight solution, since they’re going to be the ones still in control of Congress after November. George Bush has achieved the one thing he set out to do: set the whole world on fire and then sneak out the back door to let someone else handle the hard part. Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Harry Reid, Chris Dodd, et.al. won’t have the luxury of walking away.

Last week I mentioned that Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders was calling for a completely different approach to this crisis, and now he’s elevated that call to the status of an actual petition. Sanders’ petition acknowledges what many of us believe will happen: the arrival of a significant depression to rival or exceed the scale of the Great Depression of the 1930s. And, borrowing from the way Franklin Roosevelt acted to alleviate some of the personal misery that befell so many people, Sanders’ proposal is simple, direct, and aimed at the average person, not the Wall Street arbitrageur whose portfolio shrank from $400 million to only $350 million. His proposal is thus:

1. Ensure that middle income and working families are not the ones who are paying for this bailout by
* Imposing a five-year, 10 percent surtax on income over $1 million a year for couples and over $500,000 for single taxpayers. That would raise more than $300 billion in revenue over five years;
* Ensuring that assets purchased from banks are realistically discounted so companies are not rewarded for their risky behavior and taxpayers can recover the amount they paid for them; and
* Requiring that taxpayers receive equity stakes in the bailed-out companies so that the taxpayers’ assumption of risk is rewarded when companies’ stock goes up.

Taken together these three provisions will substantially reduce the likelihood that this bailout will end up on the backs of average American taxpayers.

2. Include a major economic recovery package which puts Americans to work at decent wages. Among many other areas, we can create millions of jobs rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure and moving our country from fossil fuels to energy efficiency and sustainable energy. Further, we must protect our must vulnerable families from the very difficult times they are experiencing.

3. Repeal the disastrous de-regulatory legislation that facilitated this crisis.

4. End the danger posed by companies that are “too big to fail,” that is, companies whose failure would cause systemic harm to the U.S. economy. If a company is too big to fail, it is too big to exist. We need to determine which companies fall in this category and then break them up.

The first point addresses the reality that it is the rich who stand to benefit the most from any bailout plan. As a society, we must stop enabling the rich to steal again and again from the pockets of the middle class. There are many calling for a flat tax that would similarly place the burden of financial obligation on those who have benefitted the most and manage to contribute the least due to tax loopholes, legislation that favors the wealthy, and other systemic iniquities. I think the surtax described here, temporary and focused on the wealthiest, is a better idea.

But it is Sanders’ second point that needs the most support. Economic recovery WILL NOT HAPPEN by saving the fortunes of the wealthy. As a society we have to disabuse ourselves of the warped view that we have adopted toward the distribution of wealth. It may have worked for a few of decades after the Second World War, but since the 1980s the concentration of wealth into such a tiny percentage of the population has become pathological. We are going to pay the price for that as businesses start to go belly up over the next year or two, and we are not well-equipped to do so. The fedferal government can and should prepare for the mobilization of unemployed workers in a second New Deal that seeks to restore the infrastructure of the nation, reinvest Americans in their own communities, and create new structures for business in the future than are less dependent on the failed model of credit capitalism.

Sign the petition, but take it to the next step and communicate this to your congressional representatives, particularly if they voted for the bailout today. Congress CAN do something if they aren’t rushed by the Bushies to take any deal they can get. We need a good deal, a new deal to move forward.

See Also

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress