Tag cell phones

Behind The Curve

baby-cellphone

Back when Charlotte first started kindergarten several years ago, I wondered aloud in the old BKO Lounge if we should get her a cell phone. At the time, a phone called Firefly, had just appeared on the market. The phones had limited functionality — some pre-programmable buttons to dial just a couple of phone numbers — which seemed to me to be about the right speed for small children who really only need to be able to get in touch with Mom and Dad. The denizens of the Lounge dissuaded me of the idea. Kindergarten kids these days are rarely out of the sight of a supervising adult who can call in an emergency, and the argument was also made that it might foster a bit too much clinginess if a child could call his or her parents at any time. I was persuaded and decided that we’d revisit the idea of a cellphone when Charlotte was older.

Well, she’s older. And the world is a very different place than it was four years ago. This Fast Company blog post says that 20% of American 8-year-olds now have cell phones, and that the percentage rockets to 50% by age 10. By age 12, nearly 80% of American children have their own cell phones. And, the research says, they use more of the feature set of contemporary smartphones: children are more likely to make use of the built-in cameras, play the games, use the MP3 player functionality, and, of course, text messaging. This article from the Boston Globe’s Sunday magazine even looks at the idea that children as young as 3 can have developmental benefits from playing with the iPhone. According to that article, the “Educational” category of iPhone apps on iTunes is becoming a repository of all sorts of games and activities for smaller children.

For quite some time, whenever the discussion of “When can I have a cell phone, Daddy?” has come up with Charlotte, my default answer has been “When you’re twelve”. That answer comes from the assumption that she wouldn’t be independent enough to have a legitimate need for a cellphone any sooner than that. However, we’ve definitely crossed a threshold this year where there are some activities and events that are “drop-offs”: birthday parties are now decidedly “no parents” unless the inviting parent specifically asks you to stay. Ditto for both of the Halloween parties Charlotte went to last week. Her dance lessons have become a drop-off as well. In all these cases, we’re comfortable with the situation because of the presence of responsible adults, but it represents the beginning of a change that will only continue to increase, with a corresponding decrease in the presence of adults.

The FC post is based on this post from A.C. Nielsen, which actually did the study. As one might expect from a Nielsen study, the results are framed for their target audience, the people who buy and sell advertising in the media, so much of what they have to say is about the “new opportunities” created by handing a new advertising medium over to an easily-persuaded consumer, but one area that I think needs to be looked at is the section where they note what a terrible job parents do in terms of restricting usage and setting limitations for cell phone use. All those stories of children racking up massive overtime charges don’t come out of nowhere. Nielsen says that more than half of parents who give their kids cell phones NEVER use the built-in parental controls, and even among those parents who DO use the controls the percentages of people using things like time-of-day limits, download restrictions, and allocating minutes hover in the 20% range.

When I think about giving Charlotte a cell phone and the possible implications of that, I look to her computer usage as a reference to guess what her phone use profile might be like. She’s discovered sites like Webkinz and Club Penguin and likes to use them, but the idea that they represent a place where she can communicate with other people seems a little bit lost on her. Even though these sites are intended to be social networking, for her they are places to play solo games, not to chat with other kids. Eight-year-olds haven’t quite figured out that part where they self-organize into cliques, and her only-child status has acted on her in a way that she can be quite removed from bonding with other kids. So it’s possible, I think, that giving her a phone without all the bells and whistles of the latest generation of smartphones could work for its intended use. Still, I’m feeling like 10 is probably closer to the point of no return than either 8 or 12.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Products Of The Future — For Women Only

Ladies, you may not have realized this, but it appears that the place to go when you need steep lingerie is not Victoria’s Secret or Frederick’s Of Hollywood, but rather downtown Damascus.

Yes, apparently Syria, better known as one of those America-hatin’ Islamofascist WMD-hidin’ Axis-Of-Evil-type A-rab countries, is actually a hotbed of steamy, no-limits underwear manufacture. It seems that underneath those burqas, Islamic ladies are making up for lost opportunities. The picture above is of a thong with a place to put your cell phone — you’ll never want to take your phone off vibrate with this spicy number.

If you’re intrigued, but can’t exactly jet off to Damascus, you can buy the book!

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Linkapalooza – Sci/Tech

Gizmodo reports that NASA has released this pair of images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope a couple of years ago. As you can see, a fairly substantial object instantaneously appeared in a portion of space that the telescope was pointed at while looking for supernovae. It increased in magnitude over the period of 100 days, then faded away back to nothingness in the same amount of time. According to the scientists who wrote this up for the Astrophysical Journal, the object did not match any known pattern for a supernova, is inconsistent with gravitational microlensing, and does not match any known object in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey database.

Maybe the Vogons finally got all the necessary permits for that hyperspace bypass after all. Do you know where your towel is?

DSL Reports says that scientists at the Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies in Pisa, Italy have successfully tested a wireless network technology capable of a throughput speed of 1.2 terabits per second. That utterly shatters the previous record, which was 160Gbps. By comparison, your typical home wireless network running 802.11g (which is soon to be superseded by 802.11n) crawls along at 19 megabits per second, literally about a billion times slower. The technology uses a combination of optical and radio transceivers, where present conventional wireless networking is entirely radio-based. The first practical use for such technology is hoped to be inter-satellite communication, but before you know it, you’ll be able to pick up one of these babies at Circuit City for 69 bucks.

Okay, if that link wasn’t geeky enough for you, this one is guaranteed to make your eyes roll back in your head: it’s an Ars Technica interview with Tim Sweeney, the guy who developed the Unreal 3D graphics engine and co-founded Epic Games. Having just spent the better part of an entire weekend frigging around with replacing the graphics card in my computer so that I would be able to play Spore, this article caught my eye. The subject of the interview is his view that gaming PCs are going to swing away from big fat GPUs (graphics processing units) on motherboards and graphics cards and back towards processing all graphics right in the CPU itself. The advent of the GPU was a big, big deal for high-speed three-dimensional rendering when it first emerged in the ’90s — it took lots of load off the CPU, which could then be given over to other tasks, and it created a particular paradigm of graphics processing that has taken the animation of computer games from the clunky styles of yesteryear to the near-flawless rendering you see today. But, Sweeney argues, the multi-core processor is ready to take back graphics and do an even better job with improved software-based rendering. The best part is that you won’t even need a tricked-out gamer PC to achieve all of this; even laptops will come with the processing power necessary to render 3D graphics flawlessly soon enough.

Back to outer space for a minute…remember that Gamma Ray Burst that was so powerful it was visible to the naked eye? You don’t? Well, I posted about it when it happened. You just weren’t paying attention. A few days ago, astronomer and blogger Phil Plait filled in some of the details about just how close we all came to being crispy-crittered by the aforementioned GRB. Let’s just say we wouldn’t have had to worry about the Large Hadron Collider, if this thing had been a few billion miles closer, mm-kay?

A sign of the times: The University of Kentucky has decided to yank all the land-line telephones wired into dorm rooms on their campus because students have abandoned using them in favor of cellphones, IM and other modern communications devices. I can still remember standing in line for what seemed like a bazillon years as a freshman at Northwestern to get signed up for an account with Illinois Bell. Every dorm room at NU had (has?) a landline, and rare was the pair of roommates who did not have their own telephone. By comparison, my friends who went to University of Maine didn’t have in-room phones, and it was always a crapshoot trying to call them on the one public-use phone in their dorm lounge. We’d have to coordinate a call-time via letters (yes, snail-mail! It took a week and a half to arrange a 10-minute phone call once a month!).

Another sign of the times: while UK students might have traded landlines for iPhones, their iPhones are spying on them. This Wired blog post discusses a little-publicized bit of information about the iPhone: the clever way it returns you to the exact place you left off when you turned off your phone is by caching screenshots every time the screen changes. That cache persists in the iPhone’s memory, and, according to one hacker, can be accessed by anyone savvy enough to find the cache, not the least of whom are the assorted phone-tapping intelligence people George Bush keeps on hand to “fight terrorism”. Your entire history of activity on the iPhone, not just your phone calls, can be completely traced. So whatever you do, the next time you plan to blow up the World Trade Center, don’t call Osama on your iPhone, got it?

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

This Is You Brain On Cell Phones

My friend Jo posted a link to this video she saw over at Serious Eats. Watch what happens when these French fellows point four cellphones at a handful of popcorn kernels and then ring all four phones at once.

Keep that in mind when you stick one of those ludicrous-looking Bluetooth headsets into your ear, or spend your entire commute yakking on the phone.

UPDATED: Okay, it is a hoax. The most believable explanation I’ve heard is that there’s a heating element under the tablecloth. There’s also some discussion as to whether it’s really a “viral” video being propagated by some group, since there are three or four versions in various languages, all of which are nearly identical. Ooh, I hate being punk’d.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Can You Smell Me Now? GOOD!

The German news site “The Local” reports that a pair of German companies have patented a technology that would let people “send smells” via SMS text messaging on their cell phones. Their initial plan is to incorporate a “smell chip” into cell phones that would come pre-embedded with up to 100 different scents such as vanilla, roses, or “the beach” (don’t let Cosmo Kramer find out about that one). It’s also possible, the spokesperson said, that there might be some “bad smells” available, too.

The companies don’t have any actual product right now, but they hope to convince cell phone manufacturers to incorporate their technology into new cell phone designs within a couple of years. I, for one, will not hold my breath waiting for that to happen (thank you, I’ll be here all week, try the veal).

(via)

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

This Call Is Brought To You By Ex-Lax

Economist Tyler Cowen had this post about the possibility of the rumored Google cell phone being advertising-supported.

Cowen asked his regular readers to comment on whether or not they’d use a cell phone and/or service provider that was offered for free in return for listening to ads every time they make or receive a call. The comments so far mostly indicate that those commenters would be willing to listen to ads in return for free service, but that’s sort of contrary to what industry analysts believe.

Personally, I think that it’s likely to meet with mixed success. There will be a lot of interest from people who are generally shut out of the traditional cell phone market, but a lot of those potential users have some downside attached to them if you’re Google — skips, bad credit, low income — and those users are also not likely to be attractive to some advertisers. Initially, there’ll be a lot of more attractive users — the early-adopter geek and business crowd — but they’re the group mostly likely to be put off most easily by intrusive advertising.

Would you use a cell phone service for free in return for listening to ads? I actually think I would, as long as emergency calls weren’t involved. I wouldn’t need or want some high-end iPhone clone like Google is working on, though.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Call Your Congresscritter!

Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar and West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller are co-sponsoring a bill that would add all sorts of consumer protections to cellular phone service. Among the provisions of the bill are limits to early termination fees, fee disclosures, service map disclosures, providing customers a 30-day window for cancellation, and asking the FCC to study the competitive fairness of locked vs. unlocked phones.

The bill was submitted to the Senate Commerce Committee last week to be scheduled for hearings by the Consumer Affairs subcommittee. If one of your senators is a member of the subcommittee, you should contact them to register your support for this bill. Congress is particularly anti-consumer these days, but cellular service providers are particularly egregious in their dealings and there need to be better protections.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

NOT An iPhone Post

tmobile%20hotspot%20phone.jpg tmobile%20router.jpg

Everybody has been so busy gushing over the iPhone, that T-Mobile’s new HotSpot@Home WiFi serivce got lost in the noise. The NYT’s tech writer, David Pogue, was somehow able to tear himself away from his iPhone long enough to have a look and has a good piece on the plusses and minuses of the service.

You DO need a WiFi capable phone or similar device. And to use the service at home, you need a wireless router attached to your broadband service (the T-Mobile-branded D-Link model pictured above is a nice bit of marketing, but any wireless router will do). In effect, T-Mobile is entering the same space as Skype and Vonage (which Pogue points out) with VoIP service, but they’re giving away the VoIP part (well, you do pay a $10/month charge for the service, but the calls are free) while enabling you to have just one phone that can be used for cellular or VoIP calls.

One important hiccup is that there’s no seamless transition from cellular to VoIP in terms of charging you — if you begin your call on the cellular network and then switch to a WiFi hotspot, T-Mobile charges you as if the whole call were made on cellular. But, Pogue says, the reverse is also true: if you make a WiFi call and then switch to cellular, you are NOT billed for the call. I presume that if T-Mobile finds that they’re losing too much billing this way, they’ll put a stop to it somehow.

The value of the service also relies on the availability of free WiFi hotspots — great at home, but not always available when you’re out and about. However, Pogue says you can make free WiFi calls from the T-Mobile hotspots found at Starbucks and Borders. Great. As if the Starbucks stores weren’t already full of people with laptops hogging all the tables, now there’ll be the cellphone freeloaders too.

If Vonage survives its battle with Verizon, they’d be very smart to partner with a cellular service provider ASAP to even out the playing field a bit. I think this is a very smart idea and will be paying attention to see if it’s worth giving a try next year when it’s time to re-evaluate our home phone service.

Comments:
The thought of “cellphone freeloaders” at the chill local coffee shop freaked me out too, until I thought about it some more and realized wait, the chill local coffee shop is already full of people talking too loudly on their cell phones. But now I will make sure to double-check my wireless router’s security configuration, so I don’t wake up one morning and find some geek having an animated conversation on my porch.
Posted by rmcmahon [URL] on 07/06/07

Good point. A cellphone freeloader riding on your home network is a definite possibility.
Posted by Brian [URL] on 07/06/07

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site