Tag Cindy McCain

Goes Nicely With Your Big Red One Sweater

Looking for something to wear with your Army-branded sweater? Maybe you need a bullet-proof polo shirt from these guys. It’ll only set you back $10K, and it repels automatic weapons fire. What the heck, right? Cindy McCain spent $300,000 on her outfit at the RNC the other night, and it wasn’t the least bit bulletproof!

Designed for the upscale urban hipsters in Colombia (no, seriously), there’s a whole line of fashion-wear that incorporates style and total body protection.

Actually, it might come in handy if McCain gets elected and starts all the wars he says we need to fight for the next hundred years. In fact, he’d better buy one himself — I’m sure they’ve got something to go with his $500 loafers

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Obviously Somebody Was Paying Attention

(PLEASE NOTE: The language in this video is VERY NSFW)

The other day, I suggested that perhaps in response to the continued Republican campaign tactics of lies and smears, we ought to remind people about John McCain’s loving pet name for his wife, Cindy.

Looks like someone took me up on it.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Shameless Bastards

The cretins at FOX News should be ashamed of such tawdry race-baiting, except, of course, they have no shame. Or common sense. Or human decency.

Just days ago they tried the other favorite smear tactic — implying that the Obamas are terrorists — with the “terrorist hand jab” remark, and the blood from E.D. Hill’s seppuku knife wasn’t even cold before Michelle Malkin follows up with the big one: these people are niggers!

From now until November, and, if he wins, until the day he leaves the White House, FOX News is going to make sure that everybody knows that Barack Obama and his wife are BLACK!!! It is Strategy Number One from Roger Ailes, no doubt with some expert advice from Karl “I’m Just A Commentator” Rove. It will allow John McCain to put enough distance between himself and the smear campaign that he can say he never played dirty politics, and yet we are going to be plastered day and night with “don’t vote for Obama, he’s black” from FOX. Meanwhile, the other news outlets will be drawn like mosquitos to a bug zapper to the ongoing furor that will result, lending endless gobs of coverage, and hence credibility, to the whole damn sideshow.

I think it’s even more reprehensible that they’ve chosen to aim first at Michelle Obama. The insinuations of there being a videotape of her ranting, the instant comparisons of her wardrobe to HIllary Clinton’s (and here we go with that “the only thing that matters about women is their appearance” meme again), fabricating “quotes” from her college thesis, and now this low-life sleazeball insinuation jab.

Maybe from now until Election Day, every time John McCain’s wife appears on camera they should call her “that cunt, Cindy” to remind people what McCain seems to think of his meal ticket spouse. That would certainly level the playing field. Right into the sewer.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Another Link Dump: Political News

Since it’s obviously my day to blow through a pant-load of links, let’s move on to politics, shall we?

1. Other than the spinmeisters and poo-flinging political bloggers, does anyone even remotely care that John McCain may or may not have shtupped a hot blonde lobbyist who bears an uncanny resemblance to his wife?  Have we not gotten so accustomed to these stories that they no longer matter?  I should think everybody would just be glad that it was a woman, since the “G” in “GOP” seems to stand for “Gay”.  To me the only points of interest here are these:  that it might have been the Republican Party itself which gave the story to the Times, since the Bush crowd does not like McCain; that the Times has been sitting on this story since December at the request of the McCain people and probably has more dirt that they left out for fear of lawsuits; and that McCain did political favors for a contributor who was represented by said hottie’s lobbying firm.  The sex part is the LEAST of the story.

2. This blog post is supposed to be a letter from a Wellesley classmate to Hillary Clinton about why she’s not supporting her fellow alum.  It’s more of a litany of the various crimes against humanity that Monsanto is accused of and then a “guilt-by-association” argument because Clinton’s law firm represented Monsanto and Bill Clinton’s administration had a cozy relationship with them.  It is a very good explanation of the way corporations influence politics and politicians, but I didn’t see anything in it that was more than what you could smear any elected official in Washington with.  Which is really sad, when you think about it, but it doesn’t justify singling her out.  By contrast, read this post at Daily Kos written by a woman who decided to take it upon herself to compare the actual records of Clinton and Obama in the Senate and concluded that Obama had done more in terms of introducing good legislation than Clinton.  She is quick to admit that for the most part, there’s very little difference between the two and her decision to become an Obama supporter is based on her perception that he did a better job getting his legislative issues through the Congress than she did.  That is probably the first realistic assessment of the Clinton-Obama paradox I have read yet.

3. Also WRT HRC, this blogger suggests that maybe the solution is for President Obama to appoint Hillary Clinton to the Supreme Court.  Many people have already suggested that Hillary should appoint Bill to the Supreme Court if she’s elected, but I don’t think I’ve seen this suggestion before.  If you read the post, the reasoning is actually pretty good — removed from the burden of having to “triangulate” her position as an elected politician, HRC could more boldly embrace a progressive agenda on the court and push back many of the draconian decisions the Roberts Court has been willing to hand over to the Bush Administration.  This would leave Bill to continue to pursue his other pet projects and not draw continuous political fire for his “kitchen cabinet” position.

4.  You may have read the news last week that long-time Republican congressman Tom Lantos died.  Now, legal scholar and privacy advocate Larry Lessig has announced that he is considering running for that seat in November.  I hope that this is a sign that real grass-roots progressive politics are beginning to take hold and will pay off by putting some people in Congress who really CAN bring about change.  In the same vein, this piece in The Nation is a fine reminder of Dennis Kucinich’s committment to progressive issues and what his real impact has been on this election season in terms of pushing Clinton and Obama on those issues.  Now that he’s back running for re-election in his district, he’s facing a serious challenge to retain his seat.  I didn’t get around to donating to his presidential campaign, but I will donate to his re-election campaign for sure.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site