Tag Cisco

Tech News

That’s a picture of a prototype of a very tiny PC that a group called the Raspberry Pi Foundation hopes to turn into a real product that could be sold for about $25. It has 128MB of memory, which is enough to run some flavor of Linux, and would rely on an SD card for storage (presently they go up to 32GB). There’s only one USB port, but you could presumably connect a small hub so you could attach a keyboard and a mouse and maybe even a USB WiFi adapter (since there’s no built-in networking). It would be cool if they do end up being able to bring this to the market for such a small price point, but everything about it reminds me of the hype that went into the OLPC seven or eight years ago. Meanwhile, by the time they do get it to market, smartphones will have replaced PCs anyway.

While we’re talking about tiny tech, here’s a story from Singularity Hub about video cameras the size of a grain of salt that can be used for endoscopy (among other uses) and are intended to be disposable. They’ll probably end up embedded in so many different things your head will explode, but at least there will be plenty of pictures of that moment to share on Facebook.

Aaaand, speaking of ubiquitous cameras and their myriad uses…here’s ANOTHER Singularity Hub post that wonders why we STILL don’t like to engage in video chatting, even though it’s gotten to be essentially free and trivial to set up. If you figure it out, I’m sure the folks at MicroSkype would love to hear it.

Fast Company reports that PBS conducted a survey of iPad users with children as part of their effort to develop some iPad apps and discovered that 70% of them are willing to let their small children play with their iPads and regularly download apps specifically for the kids to play with. Like their headline implies, this really only reaffirms one of the main criticisms leveled at the iPad: that it is simply a toy, albeit a 500-dollar toy. The school board in my hometown might want to take notice of this.

Speaking of tablet computers (man, I am just FULL of segues today), next week Barnes & Noble are expected to announce the next generation of their Nook e-reader (since all of us left behind from the Rapture will have plenty of spare time to catch up on our reading), and Ars Technica recently speculated on what that announcement might entail. Their guess is that it’s a refresh of the original e-ink Nook and not the more advanced color Nook, which lately is everybody’s favorite cheap way to get a tablet computer.

Lastly, British tech news website The Register, who win the award for most frequent non-ironic use of the word “Boffin”, says that it looks like Cisco is going to unload the Linksys home router business as part of the same realignment strategy that saw them discontinue the Flip videocamera a couple of weeks ago. I know the home wireless router business isn’t what it used to be since the cable companies that provide Internet service to most American homes now incorporate wireless routers right into their cable modem devices, but you gotta think that somebody would pick that up.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

IP On Everything

I’ll bet you’ve heard that all the IP addresses on the Internet have been given away. It’s a problem that has been predicted for years and years, but finally actually came to pass a couple of weeks ago. In the short term, it’s not really a problem, because the current system of addressing, called IPv4, will lumber along, but in the long term the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 is likely to create a number of headaches, since it’s not like anybody has used all this time to figure out how that transition was going to be accomplished.

The video above comes from this Lifehacker article, which tries to reduce the complicated tale down to the most salient points for end-users. The TL;DR version is that as the transition begins in earnest, ISPs are likely to have a bitch of a time while everybody slowly replaces network gear and adopts IPv6, but unless you have to deal with networks yourself you are unlikely to know the difference, but you’ll know about it when you have a hard time getting to some website because of an IP address issue. I predict there will be boatloads of money to be made for networking consultants for the foreseeable future!

So stories like the one I ran across the other day at NetworkWorld about Cisco’s footdragging about adding IPv6 to their home-user Linksys wireless routers strike me as a bit unnecessary. It is indeed cringeworthy that Cisco hasn’t done this, while pretty much everybody else has, but it’s also not the most pressing problem for home users, who will be shielded from the need for IPv6 on their personal networks for a very long time.

I also wanted to mention this slightly-related story about the imminent arrival of custom TLDs (top-level domain names). Unlike the IP space, there is no real way to run out of domain names, but top-level domains have an enormous amount of value in the practical day-to-day business of the web. In the olden days, there were only a handful — .com, .net, .mil, .edu, .org — as befit the limited scope of the Internet. Later, a bunch more were added like .biz and .info, not to mention all the national TLDs. Now, ICANN is set to cash in big on selling any old TLD name you might want. However, lest you think you’re going to score big by registering a TLD and selling off the space yourself, you should know that the price of registering a TLD will be $185,000. That’s enough to keep smallfry domain squatters from scooping up valuable TLDs the way they have with .com domains, but within the reach of lots and lots of corporate entities, who will be glad to do so and then resell the domains for enormous profit.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Don’t Let The Valet Take The Key

Earlier this year, Cisco finally did away with the Linksys brand name on their home wireless networking gear (they had acquired Linksys all the way back in 2003). They added some swoopy industrial design, redid the configuration UI to be “easier”, renamed the product the “Cisco Valet”, and jacked up the price of a basic home wireless router from about $75 to $129.

My blog-buddy “Going Like Sixty” found himself of a new router the other day and bought one on the premise that it would be very simple to set up, but, as he tells us here, any visions of “breezing through the simple screens” quickly disappeared into that sucking morass known as “Bangalore Tech Support Madness”. He’s a little bitter about the whole thing.

Frankly, I’m having a hard time imagining why the marketeering geniuses at Cisco thought setting up a wireless router needed to be “easier”, since wireless routers have been probably the simplest bit of home computer tech ever created. In fact, they have been, to some degree, TOO easy because it has always been possible to just plug one in and have it work with very little intervention required, with the result being tons of home wireless networks being set up with nobody ever changing the default admin passwords or implementing the built-in (and equally simple-to-enable) encryption. And now most people don’t even need to bother with their own wireless router, since the cable companies wised up and built them right into their cable modems. Jacking the price and alienating the technically-disinclined doesn’t really seem like a great business plan…but, then again, we are talking about Cisco.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

A Big Fat One-Way Pipe

Some assorted bits and pieces about the cable world to tie together for you:

All the various tech sites are reporting that Time Warner Cable is going to test-drive a “pay-per-bits” pricing scheme for Internet access. Not unlike your cellular service, you would pre-pay for a set amount of bandwidth usage per month and then pay a premium in the form of per-byte overage fees. But, as DSL Reports also informs us, TWC is likely to set the bandwidth cap pretty low during the trial period — perhaps as low as 5GB. On the face of it, that might sound like a lot to you, but to anyone who downloads media content from the Internet, 5 gigs is a pittance. A single movie might be 5GB.

Most reactions to this news are pretty unfavorable, but telco guru David Isenberg says he thinks this isn’t a bad idea at all as a stopgap measure to deal with bandwidth usage outstripping the existing network infrastructure. Making people pay will slow down some bandwidth hogs, and is probably a fairer way of dealing with the issue than abandoning net neutrality and establishing preferred-access tiers for providers.

Meanwhile, at the CES show Cisco announced a 1Gbps “concept” cable modem that would work under DOCSIS 3.0′s channel-bonding process (which otherwise caps out around 150Mbps). Since DOCSIS 3.0 isn’t even implemented yet (and probably won’t be for another year), this is a “sneak-peek” at something that might be four or five years down the road. Of course, if your cable service only lets you download 5GB a month, about the only thing a gigabit cable modem will do is let you use up your allotted bandwidth 25 times faster than you can right now, but maybe by the time this puppy starts shipping they’ll have beefed up the backbone a bit.

They will want to get going on that sooner rather than later, too. In 2006, cable provider Cablevision tested a “network DVR” service that let customers have some DVR features without having to have a set-top box, but the test was pulled due to a court order that said they were crossing over into broadcaster territory by “redistributing content”. Now, our friends at Comcast think they’ve found a way around that by limiting the functionality of the network DVR. Your TiVo, or even your cable company DVR set-top box can fast-forward and rewind through recorded programs as well as provide the time-shifting ability of recording a show and watching it whenever you want. Comcast’s test service will only let you jump back to the beginning of a program already in progress — no fast forwarding whatsoever (which means you can’t skip through the commercials), and, from the description Ars Technica provides I’d say that rewinding and recording aren’t going to be part of the feature set either. There are indeed times where it would be great to be able to jump back to the beginning of a program you just turned into (a feature you can’t do with TiVo or other hardware DVRs unless they’re already on that channel), but personally I can’t see why anyone would pay for that service instead of a full-featured DVR unless it is super-cheap. Unless, of course, the real goal of the cable companies is to defeat the DVR in the long term and make this sort of “crippled” service the only one you can have.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site