Tag digital cameras

One For Charlotte, One For Me

charlotte-selfpic

When Charlotte gets her hands on my camera, her most favorite subject is herself. Every time I download pictures from the memory card, there’s at least a couple dozen shots of her own face from about three inches away. Plus, she always manages to look like she has been on a non-stop week-long weed-smoking binge in 90% of the pictures, so I don’t even want to save them for the “cuteness” factor. It’s a good thing we don’t have to use film cameras any more.

So whoever thought up this latest innovation clearly had narcissistic children and stoners in mind: a camera with an LCD viewing screen in the front.

front-lcd-camera

I suppose it’s also useful for those embarrassing Facebook photos and avatars and such. Never again will the social networker be forced to comb their hair backwards to stand in front of a mirror to take their head shot and not look like their reflection. I expect this particular gadget to sell like hotcakes.

augmented-reality

And here’s a bit of whizbangery that I can’t wait to get my hands on: an “augmented reality” app for the iPhone that can identify where you are via GPS and then annotate the live video from the built in webcam to provide you with information about your surroundings. (Here’s a direct link to the BBC video from that story, if you prefer).

Acrossair’s “New York Nearest Subway” and “Nearest Tube” (for London) will be available on the iTunes Store as soon as Apple releases the next upgrade of the iPhone OS (v.3.1), but the BBC story also refers to a Dutch company which rolled out an even more-comprehensive app called Layar which runs on phones using Google’s Android OS and can display information about shops, restaurants, ATMs, and even real estate listings. That service is limited to the Netherlands (in fact, I think it’s only for Amsterdam proper), but they anticipate expanding the service to other European cities soon.

Of course, the ultimate setup for a technology like that is to embed the display into a pair of glasses so that you wouldn’t need to look like a complete dork walking around New York holding your smartphone in front of you, but I suppose people have gotten used to looking like dorks walking around talking on their Bluetooth headsets, so what’s the diff? Nevertheless, I think this would be an extremely cool iPhone app.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

If Rod Blagojevich Sold Cameras

Go buy a fucking camera. What? You haven’t bought the fucking thing yet? Just remember Blago gets a cut. He ain’t in this for the appreciation, motherfucker.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Through A Cellphone Darkly

Michael Agger has a piece on Slate this week decrying the ubiquity of camera-phones.

His chief complaint is that by putting cheap-and-easy cameras into the hands of every single yob in the world, the world is now deluged with more crap pictures than ever before. More unfortunately, he says, it also has invented a whole new realm for antisocial behavior that makes use of the simplicity of photographing the event for posterity: the nuisance assaults called “happy slapping” that turned into a bit of an issue in the U.K., the inevitable upskirt shots, and other acts of vandalism. Oh, and the inability of celebrities to go about their daily lives without being photographed (color me unsympathetic on this one).

He only hints at the broader implications of the potential presences of sometimes hundreds of cameras in public situations. The most notable one being the availability of on-the-spot photography of disasters, emergencies, crimes, and other situations that previously required the presence of the newsmedia to capture — the occasional fortuitous presence of a news photographer at a major unexpected event has allowed history to capture very few such moments as they happened, but for the most part photographic or other recorded evidence has generally been after-the-fact. He acknowledges that this is a generally good thing, resulting in better access to such events without the control mechanisms of journalistic or governmental gatekeepers.

Public officials are beginning to see this for themselves. Earlier this week, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced a new plan that will allow people to send their own digital images and even video to the city’s 311 (city services) and 911 dispatchers (link via BoingBoing). Witness a mugging? See a building catch on fire? Need to prove that your garbage isn’t being picked up on time? Send the city a picture or a video to document your issue.

Okay, that sounds good, right? But the downside is that the city is now recruiting its citizens to essentially spy on one another, using a troublesome reliance on the veracity of photography as prima facie evidence. It might not be quite as sinister as the East German Stasi requiring neighbors to report on fellow neighbors, or even former Attorney General Ashcroft’s discredited plan to institute neighborhood patrols by mailmen and utility workers, but it’s absolutely a first step in that direction. Americans decry the overabundance of CCTV security cameras in Britain, but in the “post 9-11 world” have been more than willing to rat on just about anybody that seemed even remotely out of place. Now they are being given the green light to take pictures of anything they think is wrong and send it to the police. The potential for abuse on the part of camphone wielding panic-mongers AND overly zealous law enforcement and governmental personnel is simply ENORMOUS.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site