Tag domestic terrorism

The Madness Of The Right

Getting a lot of attention this morning is a very disquieting piece in Mother Jones about the Oath Keepers, a right-wing militia group that is attracting scores of ex-military and (even more disturbingly) law enforcement personnel in their efforts to prepare for “the coming tyranny”. We on the left have all had our jollies making fun of the pathetic Teabaggers, with their misspelled signs and their wacky conspiracies, but these people transcend the nonsense of political foolsmanship because they represent an actual danger to the public. Armed to the teeth, trained for military action, and blinded by ideology, they are the shock troops that would bring ordinary citizens to their knees in seconds if they ever decided to take things into their own hands.

Not getting much attention nationally, there was an arrest in tony Manchester-by-the-Sea here in Massachusetts a couple of weeks ago, where a guy was arrested because he had amassed a frickin’ arsenal in the basement of his house, preparing, he told his wife, for the imminent outbreak of hostilities. His wife actually called the cops and turned him in because she was concerned he was getting ready to start using the guns. Meanwhile, the daughter of the guy who flew his plane into the IRS offices in Austin, Texas, called him a hero on national television (though she subsequently recanted that), and there is serious debate over whether or not the guy committed an act of terrorism, despite his actions meeting every single standard definition of the word, simply because he was a white guy and not an eeeeevil Muslim.

And all of this in the shadow of a pair of political conventions that legitimize and even overtly praise the behaviors and attitudes of these people, with a seemingly unending parade of politicians openly siding with them as they align themselves for the next couple of election cycles.

We can’t keep brushing these people off, dear readers. They are dangerous, they possess a disproportional amount of influence at a time of enormous instability in our political institutions, they have outright control of “the most trusted news source” in the country and have bent the rest of the media to bias in favor of them, and I genuinely believe that all it would take is for one leader figure who was remotely credible to emerge from the pack of idiots like Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, Cheney, et.al. to ignite the entire thing like a match in a lake of gasoline. We are living on borrowed time, I believe, before this person appears.

The parallels to the situation in Weimar Germany and the rise of Hitler are too strong not to mention, even though the mere invocation of Hitler’s name draws instant opprobrium. Hitler was shrugged off by “serious people” in Germany right up to the point that he suddenly won national office and could name his own terms with the struggling leadership. The economic conditions in this country may not have reached the desperate stages of hyperinflation, but 1 out of every 5 people of working age in this country are unemployed or underemployed, and there is little hope for any change in that condition for the foreseeable future. We are ripe for a right-wing demagogue, who can instantly bring to bear armed assistance of supporters numbering in the tens of thousands, and who would likely enjoy the popular approval of at least a full third of the population. Meanwhile, the erosion of checks and balances in our government, and the unchecked expansion of executive powers that began under the last administration and has found little-to-no recision in the present one would present an enormous opportunity to that individual to sweep away everything you and I might think is unshakable about American democracy.

It’s time to stop joking about these people, time to stop dismissing them as the lunatic fringe, and recognize that a clear and present danger exists. My own opinion is that we have gone too far down the road to be able to easily prevent a political upheaval, but it may still be possible to mitigate it, particularly as long as no charismatic leader arises to galvanize the situation. That day will come, however, as it inevitably does, as it always has throughout human history. Don’t close your eyes now, because the danger is right in front of you.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Terror From Within

This post also appears today as a guest article at The Daily Clarity.

This week marks the tenth anniversary of the Columbine High School Massacre. The mainstream media already have their retrospectives, their “where are they now” pieces, and their terribly thoughtful commentaries all put together and ready to bombard us with. Meanwhile, over the past month and a half a string of mass killings and murder-suicide incidents has taken more than twice as many lives as were lost in Littleton, Colorado that April day. Fourteen people diedjust as a result of the mass killing in Binghampton, NY two weeks ago and the latest incident over the weekend involved a Maryland man killing his wife and three young children before taking his own life. News coverage of such incidents has become so commonplace that the Maryland story barely registers in the collective consciousness of the media. Also in the last several weeks, the Department of Homeland Security released a report finding a significant rise in the activity of right-wing extremist groups. Despite receiving criticism for being “inflammatory”, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano justified the need to release the report before it could be bowdlerized to avoid such criticism because of the urgency of the issue — the growing likelihood that what is random violence on the part of disturbed individuals could snowball into organized violence on the part of disaffected groups united by their self-feeding paranoia and realized by hair-trigger situations.

Our cultural obsession with the potential for terror caused by the mysterious “other” — al Quaeda, Iran, Somali pirates — has rendered us nearly blind to the reality of the terror that we instill from within. The threats from outside remain nebulous at least and utterly imaginary at most, while the possibilities of violence against innocent people from disturbed individuals and groups within our own communities realize themselves with increasing frequency and horrifying regularity. Pundits and historians alike now commonly point to September 11, 2001 as the demarcation point for a new era in American society, yet few would choose April 20, 1999 or it’s almost-exactly corresponding predecessor, April 19, 1995 (the date of the Oklahoma City bombing), for the same milestone, despite the vastly more significant occurrence of violence against ourselves.

In a sense, our projection of the source of terror and violence onto whatever handy villain our leaders can provide is little more than an ages-old mechanism for focusing public attention to a political agenda; Americans have obediently changed the locus of their hatred and fear over almost a century from Germans to Japanese to Russians to Muslims as political expedience dictated. Indeed, the transition has been so seamless most of the time, that when the first President Bush needed a new villain, the effort of trying to pick one between Manuel Noriega, Muammar Gaddafi and then ultimately Saddam Hussein was almost comic. But the buffoonish machinations of governments and politicians obscure a much more complicated problem. Our projection of terror onto “the other” is a significant denial of the growing manifestation of terror and violence as commonplace elements of our own society.

For the time being, it is possible to ease the visceral response to events like Columbine or the Binghampton shooting as the acts of people with psychological problems. The regularity of such events, though, speaks to a growing acceptance of the conditions that create those psychological disturbances and even an amplification of them to the point that they result in violent outbursts. Now, we are also told by the very agency created in response to the singular events of 9/11 that we are crossing a threshold from individuals acting out in fear, despair, and paranoia to the organization of groups who share many of the same characteristics. The metamorphosis of terroristic violence from lone gunman to motivated group may only require a very small push, and it is clear that there are people actively hoping to put themselves in the forefront of those groups. It is too easy to look back over the last ten years and see the individual incidents as they have become part of our national life. Ten years hence, how likely will it be that we will be able to begin the retrospective of the list of homegrown terrorist attacks that will form yet a new element of our society.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Slimier

Yeah, still not a political post, but I bet you can see where I’m going with today’s theme.

This post is actually a linkapalooza post of some assorted links, all of which revolve around the slimy things that ordinary people do…

We’ll start with one of the slimiest forms of humanity — the CEO. In this case, it’s the CEO of Washington Mutual, which went belly-up over the weekend. His name is Alan H. Fishman, and he became CEO and a member of WaMu’s Board of Directors on September 8 of this year. On September 25, a mere 17 days later, WaMu failed and was swallowed whole by JP Morgan Chase. Now, Mr. Fishman certainly can’t be pinned with any substantial blame for WaMu’s failure, having barely had time to find his was to the Executive Washroom yet, but he certainly didn’t suffer the loss too badly: for his 17 days on the job, Fishman collected a total of $19.1 MILLION between his severance package and his signing bonus. That’s 1.12 million dollars a day simply for being the guy who turned the lights out. If this man had a decent bone in his body, he would refuse the money or donate it to the bailout plan or something, but do not hold your breath waiting for that to happen.

The Consumerist spends a lot of time documenting the slimy practice of what they call “the grocery shrink ray” — that clever marketing technique that puts LESS product in the same old package and charges you the same old price. So, maybe the friendly local folks who run Gorton’s, which is still based in Gloucester, MA, thought they were being good guys when they opted NOT to put fewer fish sticks in each bag, but yesterday the Consumerist had an e-mail from someone who was asked to participate in a marketing study which offered these two different packages for fish sticks. As you can see, thanks to the helpful red arrow, the new packaging informs us that their fish sticks only contain 40% actual fish! Which, needless to say, should cause everyone to wonder what the hell the other 60% is made of. Now, obviously the bread-like coating makes up a significant portion of the rest, but is it really 60%? And if it is, shouldn’t the label call them “frozen bread sticks with fish” or some other more appropriate name? I guess I’m glad that the Gorton’s people are willing to be honest, but now maybe it’s time for them to go back and revisit their approach to food labelling in general.

Okay, no snarking for a moment. Via Daily Kos comes a disturbing story from Dayton, OH: someone sprayed some sort of gas or chemical into the day care area of the local mosque (pictured above). They sprayed it directly into the face of the young girl who was babysitting children while their parents attended Ramandan services. The girl told police it made her face feel like it was burning, and apparently some of the small children and an adult who was present also complained of symptoms. The Daily Kos poster and members of the Dayton mosque have speculated that the incident is related to a DVD that was distributed with the local Sunday newspaper this past weekend. The DVD was entitled “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West”.

The police say they don’t think it’s a “hate crime”, but how else do you explain this? “Haw, haw, just some kids getting out their jollies” does not cut it when something like this happens. For my money, this is nothing less than terrorism. It may not be blowing up a bus or flying a plane into a skyscraper, but it was done with the intent to frighten and discourage a specific group of people for no other reason than a political or racist agenda, and it has succeeded in chasing away innocent people from their community center by physical intimidation. A couple of years ago there was a big brouhaha in my hometown because somebody thought it would be a good idea to throw a pig head into the local mosque there — that’s a hate crime, and there have been a number of other incidents there, both serious and minor. many of which might be said to skirt the same threshold. Spreading the actual terror of the threat of being gassed, however, steps things up to a whole new level, and if the persons responsible are found, it wouls be a travesty of justice if they were not tried as terrorists.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Funny, He Doesn’t LOOK Muslim

I’ve said it before, and I ‘ll say it again: I do not believe that “Al Quaeda” (whatever that really is) will ever be able to stage another successful terrorist attack on American soil. however, I am firmly convinced that fundamentalist right-wing Christians WILL.

The events at Jerry Falwell’s funeral yesterday do nothing to dissuade me.

And what is the likelihood that this fellow will go to Gitmo? Less than zero, I suspect.

Comments:
egad…I hadn’t even heard word one about Fallwell’s planting. It figures, it just figures. I agree with you…those Evangelists scare me in a big way and my sister is one. She was never frightening until she signed on with those lunatics.
Posted by Karan [URL] on 05/24/07

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site