Tag excess

Goes Nicely With Your Big Red One Sweater

Looking for something to wear with your Army-branded sweater? Maybe you need a bullet-proof polo shirt from these guys. It’ll only set you back $10K, and it repels automatic weapons fire. What the heck, right? Cindy McCain spent $300,000 on her outfit at the RNC the other night, and it wasn’t the least bit bulletproof!

Designed for the upscale urban hipsters in Colombia (no, seriously), there’s a whole line of fashion-wear that incorporates style and total body protection.

Actually, it might come in handy if McCain gets elected and starts all the wars he says we need to fight for the next hundred years. In fact, he’d better buy one himself — I’m sure they’ve got something to go with his $500 loafers

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

A Bucket Of Popcorn Will Require A Credit App And Two References

The Hollywood Reporter says that an Australian entertainment company called Village Roadshow is constructing the first of 50 planned multiplexes that will offer a “premium” moviegoing experience. The theater, which is being built in a suburb of Chicago, will offer valet parking, reserved seating, table service, AND a $35 ticket price…and that DOESN’T include the popcorn.

Because nothing says “exclusive” like shelling out four times as much as everybody else to see the EXACT SAME MOVIE.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Capitalism Destroys Everything

A common perception among Americans is that our country is “great” because of the capitalist economy that has been the driving engine of the country since the mid-1800s. This message is constantly reinforced by almost every media outlet since, after all, most media outlets themselves are controlled by capitalists (lest you forget, the vast American media industry is owned and operated by only FIVE corporations). Beyond that, every politician from the lowliest town councilor to the President of the United States, Republican or Democrat constantly reinforces the message with their words and deeds because they receive almost all of the money that they use to run for office (plus a little baksheesh) from corporations.

And yet, capitalism itself is a remarkably destructive system. Under capitalism, practically every imaginable thing that can be produced is commoditized as much as possible through whatever means can accomplish it — economies of scale, industrialization, offshoring, cost-cutting, and even outright crimes, lies, and cheating. As far as capitalism is concerned, anything and everything is fair game in the blind pursuit of one and only one goal: profit. And once something can no longer be mined for profit, it is discarded in favor of the next profitable thing. In this way, capitalism becomes a juggernaut that simply chews up and spits out everything in its path, blind to any other consideration. To borrow from Star Trek, if I may, capitalism is not the Borg Collective, which assimilates every culture or technology it finds, it is the Doomsday Machine that simply eats every planet in its path.

Barack Obama’s campaign theme is “Change”, and lately every candidate running for President has also tried to demonstrate their claim to be the One True Representative of “Change”, but not a one of them will make a single meaningful change to the corrupt relationship between corporations and government because they are too far co-opted. This essay by a student named Ned Resnikoff was one of the finalists in a competition held by The Nation Magazine and in it he says that curtailing corporate power over the government should be the single most important change that the next President brings, because as long as our government is rendered impotent by its relationship to Big Business, the juggernaut will remain unchecked.

It needs to be acknowledged that the overconsumption of goods and resources that has been the single biggest hallmark of the American Era actually threatens the continued existence of the human race. The death spiral of consumption, which the capitalist system props up to continue its own existence, was unsustainable from the outset, even if people were not as aware of it as they are now. As we can no longer ignore its manifestation in climate change, depletion of resources, diminishing of biodiversity, and even military conflict (hint: Iraq is about THE OIL), we are powerless and will grow increasingly so without genuine change in the way business and government walk hand in hand.

Even though Americans are deeply acculturated to see capitalism as a positive force, the destructive nature of this system is not entirely hidden to us. A recent Harris Poll reveals that 84% of Americans believe that corporations hold too much power in Washington, a percentage that has been consistent across similar polling for 14 years. Further, the poll shows that over 85% of Americans believe that the largest corporations (oil companies, health care and insurance companies, car makers, and pharmaceutical makers) are the least trustworthy.

Sadly, the likelihood of this sort of change is close to non-existent, and as a result an entirely different spectrum of change will be the reality of life for our children and the generations that follow them. The “planet-killer” will eventually live up to that name, rapaciously plundering whatever it thinks it can consume until there is nothing left.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Yet Another Sign You Have Too Much Money

Gold Capsules

You spend $425 dollars a piece for these capsules filled with powdered gold to make your poop shiny.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Imagine No Possessions, I Wonder If You Can

Writing at 3QuarksDaily, Michael Blim explores the deeply dysfunctional and misguided relationship most Americans have with “The Rich”.

The rich are a significant drain on the society as a whole and are the root of significant damage to our political institutions, he argues:

Second, the rich corrupt the major institutions of American society. It bears repeating that the rich don’t get rich or stay rich simply by making better widgets and saving the profits from their corporate endeavors. They make legislatures dysfunctional, regulatory authorities their watchdogs, and professions their poodles. They corrupt presidents. They even corrupt each other, as corporate heads are bribed with board positions and in turn protect the interests of the company that bribed them.

And while they are systematically robbing us blind, they simultaneously foster a culture that worships them and dangles the enticing but eternally elusive idea that “anyone can become a millionaire”. Here he invokes Thorstein Veblen in The Theory Of The Leisure Class:

“The fact that the usages, actions, and views of the well-to-do leisure class acquire the character of a prescriptive canon of conduct for the rest of society, gives added weight and reach to the conservative influence of that class. It makes it incumbent upon all reputable people to follow their lead. So that, by virtue of its high position as the avatar of good form, the wealthier class comes to exert a retarding influence upon social development far in excess of that which the simple numerical strength of the class would assign it. Its prescriptive example acts to greatly stiffen the resistance of all other classes against any innovation….” (Penguin Books, 1994, 200)

Amazingly, most Americans will come to the defense of the rich the moment you dare suggest to them that they are parasites, because we are so attached to the fiction of “The American Dream” and the impossible hope that someday we might be rich ourselves that we enter into severe cognitive dissonance when asked to consider the reality of the situation. We even buy into the idea that it’s not the rich siphoning off all the money to waste on diamond-encrusted brassieres, personal LearJets, fleets of limousines, and whatever other decadence they desire, but that’s it’s the poor who dare to need adequate shelter, basic medical care, nutritious food, and (that most dangerous thing of all) quality eduction (perhaps the ONLY economic leveller that exists in our society).

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Don’t Forget The Lid…OR ELSE

64-Ounce Cup

Oversized soft drinks aren’t news anymore. Most fast food places and convenience stores have been selling 64-ounce (and BIGGER!!) drinks for quite some time now. But usually the big drinks come in equally large containers, as you might expect.

So I was a bit flabbergasted to see what Burger King has come up with as a promotional cup to go along with their tie-in for the upcoming “Halo 3″ video game — a 64-ounce drink that will fit in your car’s cup holder!!

Now, I’m not an engineer or anything, but a little dose of common sense should tell you that this sucker is gonna spill BIG TIME. Half a gallon of soda teetering on a base that’s about two or three inches in diameter — it’s going all over the floor the first time you hit a bump, dude. Plus, how the hell are you supposed to drink that while you’re driving? Does it come with an intravenous drip? Also, I would advise making sure that your route has a LOT of public restrooms along the way.

Yikes.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

The New Gilded Age

I think I came across this blog at random as I was mindlessly clicking the Stumble Upon button on my browser the other day, but I completely agree with the point he’s making about what’s going on in China as a harbinger of “the New Gilded Age”.

The Gilded Age of fin-de-siecle America was a time of unbridled capitalism, and, as a consequence a time of immense disparity in wealth. The rich were never so rich and the poor never so poor. Workers were slaves in all but name only, beholden to the immensely powerful owners of factories, mills, mines, and other engines of economic power. Somehow, as the 20th century replaced the 19th, a swell of reform in the form of progressive politics and politicians (most notably Theodore Roosevelt) brought to bear the power of governmental regulation to hack away at the most egregious excesses and abuses, and then later the labor movement itself was able to flourish and win further changes.

What we see in China right now is almost exactly analagous to the Gilded Age economic imbalance — when businesses are allowed to operate in unregulated environments, they will inevitably use any method that enhances profitability. It does not matter if that involves using poisonous materials, contaminated food products, or causing as much pollution as they want. Further, as the blogger’s follow-up post this morning adds, workers are treated badly, paid unfairly, and are inextricably tied to their employers.

It is important to look to China now especially, because it is China who will dominate the world economically in the 21st century. As their economy continues to overshadow and subsume our own, the pressure will continue to mount to meet their competition head-on. Setting aside their insane theocratic foreign policy for a moment, it is worth remembering that the Republican party continues to seek to push back the effects of regulation and reform and has been remarkably successful at it (in no small part because the Democratic party seeks the same goals). China today is not only a haunting reminder of our past, it is a remarkably clear and focused picture of what we can expect America to become once again. With the curtailments of our civil liberties taking root, and a national government operating entirely for the benefit of their corporate sponsors, our past is likely to be our future.

(Pretty good random find, too. I’m going to read this blog for a while, I think)

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site