Tag Google

Regretfully Yours

My life is a veritable tsunami of regret and shame, but it seems I am not alone. A marketing prof at Northwestern and a colleague from University of Illinois have published a study that shows what sort of regrets linger in the hearts and minds of the American public. The most common regrets for people are romantic, with 44% of the female respondents reporting that they regretted romantic choices they made (and DIDN’T make). The lower percentage of romantic regret among men brings that down quite a bit, but it is still the leading category by a long shot. The press release points out that, unlike past studies, this one did not rely on responses just from college students, which is often a source of result-skew, so it should be better representative of the population as a whole.

Meanwhile, researchers at Tel Aviv University have been working with Google to develop a “regret” algorithm that could help computer software predict better outcomes for future efforts. Like not sleeping with that heavy metal drummer with the sleeve tattoos, or not buying an Italian sports car, or not eating that fourth slice of cheesecake. If computers actually did any of those things. Unlike some people.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

And For $29.95 A Month, Paul The Octopus Will Come To Your House And Operate The Remote

So, back in early September, Apple announced their revamp of Apple TV, and everybody was interested for about three minutes until they all realized that it didn’t matter if the little box was cool because the service still sucked.

Around the same time the first rumors about Apple TV (now iTV, of course), Google announced that they, too, would be putting together a similar sort of service package, but instead of making a box themselves, they would simply license out the Android-based software to the regular assortment of electronics manufacturers and let them figure it out. This worked pretty well with Android on smartphones, which has taken off quite strongly, while Google’s own Nexus One phone crashed and burned in the space of six months. So, sure, let someone else make the hardware.

Though there isn’t the same legion of frothing fanbois that Apple has at its beck and call, the initial response to the announcement generated a lot of hyperbolic optimism like this because Google has managed to hang on to a lot of positive feeling in the techie crowd, despite a whole slew of dud projects over the last year. However, the first actual “Google TV” product was unveiled this week by Sony, and you can almost hear the lead balloon hitting the floor. The remote control alone will kill this sucker deader than a doornail. This TechCrunch post captures the profound ambivalence from the technogeek crowd pretty well, because most gearheads look at a remote like that as a challenge to be mastered, but even they realize that this has no chance in hell with ordinary consumers.

Like other attempts to jam the Internet and television into the same appliance, this hits the same wall: people may like to watch TV on their computers, but they don’t seem to want to use their TV *as* their computer. In this case, the iTV actually ends up looking better than the Google TV, since it adheres more closely to the idea of being a service enabler for your TV, even if the service offering is kinda weak. Yes, the iTV will probably make some apps available to run on your TV, but Apple seems to realize that there is a gulf of perception between the iPad and iTV in terms of how people will use the device, despite being able to bring the exact same stuff to either device. If Sony’s first-guy-in-the-pool effort is emblematic of how Google TV will position itself, get ready for another entry into the Unloved Technology Hall Of Fame right next to WebTV and laserdiscs.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Isn’t That Why Jesus Invented YouTube In The First Place?

at-sign

One of the things I spend an untoward amount of time on when working with my older clients is the business of uploading and downloading e-mail attachments. But lest you think I’m being ageist here, back in my days in Corporate America, I had to frequently remind the Cow Orkers about attachment size limitations and the evil practice of not clearing out huge attachments from one’s Exchange mailbox. Most cubicle cattle seem to hold to the belief that attachment limits and mailbox sizes are just IT Department power trips and routinely ignore the various warnings they receive, then cry bloody murder when their e-mail account gets locked out or they suffer data loss from exceeding the recommended size limit of their Exchange mailbox.

So Google didn’t exactly HELP by upping the size limit on Gmail file attachments to 25MB a few months ago. In a world where a single PowerPoint presentation can top out at twice that size, or when people want to mail video clips, there’s definitely an argument to be made for it, but this blog post from a Google Minion explains what it really means in terms of system overhead and why you should not mail that funny cat video to everyone you ever met.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

“It’s Fucking Close To Water”

Canoe Ventures is the name of a joint venture between all six major cable providers in the U.S. to devise and implement a technology for delivering targeted advertisements to customers via their set-top boxes. The idea was first announced last spring and formalized in June, and to-date the cable companies have spent almost $150 million toward their goal, which foresees an eventual revenue stream of $15 billion per year in the form of commercial time sold. The total television advertising revenue figure per year is somewhere around $70 billion, so they’re talking about biting off a serious chunk.

As that first link points out, the venture is an attempt on the part of the cable companies to get their share of the market before Google beats them to it. Google has been testing selling television ads via AdSense in partnership with Dish Network since that same time frame last year, so the cables were already pretty far behind, and haven’t really closed the gap since. Meanwhile, there was some scuttlebutt that Google would call the cable companies’ bluff by building their own set-top box, but those rumors subsided and the current buzz is that Motorola might integrate Google’s “Android” mobile device platform into its own series of set-tops, since they are already committed to using Android on their cell phone products. Either way, their canoe is paddling frantically to catch up to Google’s cigarette boat.

On Friday, Investor’s Business Daily ran this story about Canoe Ventures, which rehashes much of the same background info, but also says that Canoe hopes to rollout their first set-top box “early this year”, and yesterday DSL Reports said that Comcast has plans to conduct a test in Baltimore and is also planning to build a data warehouse with storage “up to 500 terabytes” to collect viewing habit data on over 16 million customer households.

Of course, all of this will COMPLETELY protect your private personal data, with absolutely NO CHANCE of compromise I’m sure…..(rolls eyeballs disdainfully)

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

This Call Is Brought To You By Ex-Lax

Economist Tyler Cowen had this post about the possibility of the rumored Google cell phone being advertising-supported.

Cowen asked his regular readers to comment on whether or not they’d use a cell phone and/or service provider that was offered for free in return for listening to ads every time they make or receive a call. The comments so far mostly indicate that those commenters would be willing to listen to ads in return for free service, but that’s sort of contrary to what industry analysts believe.

Personally, I think that it’s likely to meet with mixed success. There will be a lot of interest from people who are generally shut out of the traditional cell phone market, but a lot of those potential users have some downside attached to them if you’re Google — skips, bad credit, low income — and those users are also not likely to be attractive to some advertisers. Initially, there’ll be a lot of more attractive users — the early-adopter geek and business crowd — but they’re the group mostly likely to be put off most easily by intrusive advertising.

Would you use a cell phone service for free in return for listening to ads? I actually think I would, as long as emergency calls weren’t involved. I wouldn’t need or want some high-end iPhone clone like Google is working on, though.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Google’s Coming, Look Busy

streetmapkitty.jpg

I’m sure you’re aware that Google has recently launched street-level views as part of their Google Maps service.

It didn’t take very long for people to start noticing that the roaming vehicles that have been taking the pictures had managed to catch people in some activities they might not have wanted photographed: breaking into stores, urinating on the sidewalk, fighting with their S.O., and so on. One woman was surprised to see her cat sitting in the window of her apartment in one picture and began to wonder just how far Google was going to peek.

For the moment, the street-level views are only available for a few select cities, but Google is pouring it on to photograph quite a few more, including the Boston metro area. Adam at Universal Hub points us to this local blogger who says he’s seen a car with a roof-mounted multi-lens camera driving around Cambridge, and, since he just happened to have a camera with him, starting taking pictures of it…which apparently freaked out the driver a bit.

Didn’t anyone ever tell them that it’s not polite to look into people’s windows?

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site