Tag Howard Dean

An Aggregation Of Nincompoops

According to Alex Massie, writing in Foreign Policy, that’s how the Obama Administration is seen by counterparts in Europe, having piddled away the enormous political capital among those groups much the same way he has with the American public: an inability to turn an overwhelming legislative majority into forward progress, lack of follow-through on foreign policy reforms and initiatives that were seen as “must-haves” by the European public after eight very long years of George Bush, and waffling on global issues like “cap and trade” policy for climate change…all due to what is perceived as political incompetence. What we see as “insider baseball” with stories about in-fighting between Obama advisors like Rahm Emanuel, the rest of the world sees as fiddling while Rome burns.

Posting at True/Slant, journalist Jamie Malanowski brings a more American perspective:

Sometime, somewhere, some friend of the president needs to give him a swift kick in the ass. Somebody ought to explain to him that the country is hopping mad, and it’s mad not because `government is too big’ but because people don’t have jobs and the government isn’t doing anything about it and—here’s the kicker—highly bonused investment bankers whose skins were saved by the public continue to wager and collect without impunity. It would do the president a world of good if instead of inviting Republicans to come over for milk and cookies, he began directing throwing his weight around—ordering this, directing that, opening an investigation on something else. He must stop yielding his authority to compose the national narrative to tea baggers and Fox Newsmen.

The publisher of Harper’s Magazine, John R. MacArthur, suggests that maybe what Obama needs to get his skinny ass in gear is a primary challenge in 2012, and he offers a specific suggestion: Howard Dean. Dean, who got the boot as DNC chairman after his 50-state campaign strategy helped Obama win in 2008, has been very vocal as the progressive opposition to the hopeless health care reform legislation, and has been winning back support from the disaffected liberal Democratic voters who feel badly betrayed by Obama. MacArthur implies that Dean would only be needed to rattle Obama’s chains a little, not actually offer any stiff resistance to Obama’s re-election bid, but this Politico profile from a few weeks ago points out that Dean might have the juice needed to be a serious contender. Either way, what should be painfully obvious to anyone is that appeasing the Republicans and continuing to try to move to the right is a losing proposition, and if Obama won’t take the hint himself, then maybe somebody else needs to.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

How About Obama-Dean?

When I posted a couple of weeks ago about the idea of drafting Howard Dean, it was mostly out of my pretty serious disappointment with having to choose between Clinton and Obama. They have some superficial differences, but both are right-of-center Democrats who are unlikely to do anything drastically different from George Bush. Dean, on the other hand, is more progressive than either, and represents a much better possibility of departure from the disastrous agenda the Republicans have put us on.

This piece in the latest issue of The Nation by Ari Berman looks at the accomplishments Dean has made running the Democratic Party, even when the big guns from the Clinton camp tried very hard to marginalize him. Berman also asserts that the success of Barack Obama can be directly attributed to the success Dean has had with building Democratic Party organizations at the grass-roots level. Indeed, the seemingly floundering Clinton campaign, which quite deliberately stuck with the old-boy-network school of campaigning, lends even more credence to Dean as a politician. The article does not come right out and say it, but in its description of the emerging power of Howard Dean in the Democratic Party, it implies that Howard Dean may not be consigned to the ashcan of history just yet.

So, given the unlikely situation that the Democratic convention would pick a candidate out of thin air, I guess I’ll step off of the “Draft Dean” soapbox and climb up onto the “Dean for VP” soapbox. There are a number of decent reasons to choose Dean as a running mate — his previous popularity, his newly-found political sway in the party, the advantage he would have as an incumbent VP running in 2016, and so on. He also would not necessarily overshadow Obama — no presidential candidate wants a running mate who can be perceived as a political threat (a problem I think John Kerry had with John Edwards). In fact, given that Edwards is a potential running mate, I think Dean is a better choice than Edwards, even though the “conventional wisdom” says you have to have a Southerner on the ticket. Dean might also be able, once in office, to keep Obama on the progressive path, since Obama’s own tendency is to cave in rightward.

Plus, “Dean in ’16!” has a good ring to it.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Come Back To The Five & Dime, Howard Dean, Howard Dean

Okay, that magazine cover is from 2004, but I’m seriously wishing the Democrats would drum up a "Draft Dean" movement right about now.  The party regulars made him DNC chairman as a consolation prize for having screwed himself right out of the nomination last time, but also with the clear expectation that they could keep an eye on him there and he wouldn’t cause them much trouble…or at least not run against Hillary in 2008.  But he’s done nothing but irritate the Old Boy Network.  He insisted on a 50-state effort in the 2006 elections and put the party back into the majority in both houses, he’s developed grass-roots efforts that this year are paying off in vast increases in Democratic voter turnout not just in primaries but in caucuses, and he still manages to speak his mind whenever he gets out from under watchful eyes long enough.

The collapse of the Dean campaign four years ago had little to do with Dean’s positions as a candidate, or even his regrettable "YEAARRGGHH!" moment, but about a level of support that was a mile wide but an inch deep.  He fostered a lot of superficial enthusiasm from people not terribly involved in old-school politicking, especially younger voters who wanted "change".  So here we are four years later, and all those college kids who were sure Dean was unstoppable are now the young adult crowd that packs the halls everywhere Barack Obama goes, enchanted by the same nebulous notion of change, but only a little wiser about presidential politics.  Unfortunately, this time their dream candidate is just as superficial as they are.  Meanwhile, the older and more cynical crowd is jumping on the bandwagon out of their own unhappiness with the catch-phrase "Anyone But Clinton", without paying much attention to the point down the road where that chant is likely to bite them in the ass.

So, congratulations to Barack Obama for putting together a coalition of the unwilling and the unthinking but you’ll excuse me if I muster up no enthusiasm.  I’m not convinced that he has the nomination in his pocket because I am convinced that the Clintons will fight a scorched-earth battle to win the Pyrrhic victory of getting the nomination at the price of alienating all those newly-motivated Democratic voters who aren’t QUITE motivated enough to support whichever candidate gets the nomination, just their candidate.

Some people say this all means that the time has come for Al Gore to swoop in and save the day, but his obvious disinterest in returning to the world of electoral politics means the net has to be cast a little wider to snag a draftable candidate.  John Edwards could make a case for being that guy, and I would be okay with that, but why not Howard Dean?  Surely the political newcomers would thrill to the deus ex machina theatrics of a convention that resurrects a candidate that people were so enthused about.  Surely the media would have so much to write about that their heads would explode.  Surely the Republicans would be cast into confusion without their pre-cooked campaigns against "Billary Clinton" and "Barack HUSSEIN Obama".  And we would get a battle-tested, wiser candidate as the nominee, more committed to a progressive agenda than Obama or Clinton and perhaps a chance at real political change instead of just superficiality.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site