Every time some right-wing nutjob starts spouting off about Barack Obama being a socialist, you can be sure that they have no fucking clue about either socialism OR Obama. Which is what makes this recent Huffington Post article by conservative law scholar Jedediah Purdy embracing America’s “socialist” tradition worth reading. Purdy backs off from the absurd rhetoric of the contemporary right, which asserts that anything that isn’t pure laissez faire free market pro-corporatist ideology must be the work of Satan, and remembers that ideas about reforming economic inequality, regulating unbridled capitalism, and sharing the benefits of democratic society were once upon a time as cherished by conservatives as they were liberals. Considering that the gaggle of morons duking it out this week in Iowa and New Hampshire seem only interested in out-shrieking one another about who can destroy America the fastest, it is reassuring to learn that there are some voices on the other side who aren’t quite so ready to jump off the cliff with them.
Tag Huffington Post
Some Day You’ll Thank Me For This
Most people do not come to this realization until the day they go home from the hospital with their first child: Your Parents Are People, Too.
This Huffington Post article, clearly written by a 20-something for an audience of 20-somethings (because, of course, the only people on the Internet are all under 30) offers up “5 Truths About Your Parents” that pretty much anyone OVER 30 (those geezers) knows, even if they don’t have their own children.
Related Posts:
Oil And Water
Today marks the six-month anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig accident that turned into the largest oil spill in the history of the United States. Yesterday marked the one-month anniversary of the final sealing of the well, although the spill was largely contained by mid-July.
The media being so totally distracted by the midterm elections, they have pretty much forgotten about the oil spill, which has the unfortunate side effect of giving people an opportunity to put it out of their minds and/or jump to the conclusion that “all’s well that ends well” (pun intended). So let’s try to counteract that here, shall we?
Writing in the latest issue of Orion Magazine, Terry Tempest Williams writes about her first-hand experiences in New Orleans and other parts of coastal Louisiana over the summer, roughly from the time the temporary cap was installed until the final seal in September. Here’s a short excerpt of an encounter with a ruined shore and a reporter from CBS News engaged in some serious spin:
The marsh grasses are burnt. The mud flats hold an iridescent sheen, and it looks like a painter came to shore with buckets of oil and dipped his brush in it, then spattered the island with drops, not black or brown, but red drops, like blood. Comfort Island looks like the scene of a crime.
Jumping off the boat, I sink into the muck. It is my first look at an oiled beach. Shells are strewn across the shore, angel wings, whelks, and tiny, hinged sunrise shells. Brown pelicans and royal terns are standing three, four deep on the edge of the island. One pelican is standing on the yellow boom, now a broken circle….
Farther down the beach, a television reporter from the CBS Evening News stands with perfectly coiffed hair, sporting a flak jacket. He wants a shot with the yellow boom in the background. He is about to interview Dr. Paul Kemp, vice-president of the National Audubon Society’s Louisiana Coastal Initiative. He asks his cameraman if he is ready. The cameraman gives him the go sign: “It’s Day 100 and I am on Comfort Island in the Breton Sound with Dr. Paul Kemp of the National Audubon Society. Dr. Kemp, would you agree this is not the environmental disaster we were all expecting?”
“It’s too early to tell,” says Dr. Kemp. “We just don’t know what the effects of the dispersants are going to be on the overall ecosystem.”
“But wouldn’t you agree that the oil spill isn’t as bad as was initially predicted?”
You can see some of that media distortion still in play in this Washington Post article about BP’s efforts to make restitution payments through their “Vessels Of Oppportunity” program. The article begins with the assertion that because the oil can’t be seen, it must not be a problem anymore, and goes on to complain about the behavior of the locals scrambling for cash from the beneficient BP.
This n+1 article from September by Erin Sheehy also talks about the efforts by the locals to cash in on the VoO program, without the obvious effort to minimize the effects and lingering aftermath that hallmark the WashPost story.
Another devastating first-hand account comes from Natural Resources Defense Council spokesperson Rocky Kistner in the Huffington Post today. His words sadly echo those of Terry Tempest Williams with their descriptions of bayous turned to tar pits and the animals who inhabit that ecosystem poisoned by the hydrocarbons, while BP tries to discourage any truthful accounting of loss of wildlife:
These thoughts still plague fishermen here. They know the bayous like the back of their hands. Many people here know the oil is not gone, and they worry their lives will never be the same. Government assurances that the waters are safe for fishing just don’t wash with many of them. Scientistific reports that the marsh is recovering and the oil damage may not be as bad as once thought are met with skepticism by the fishing community here. They know something’s not right, the shrimp aren’t in the normal places and the large ones don’t seem to be migrating out to sea as they normally do this time of year.
I’ve seen numerous samples of shrimp people have saved with a black substance in their gills. Just this week, an NRDC colleague was taking photos at the Venice marina when she was shown a large grey shrimp by an irate fisherman who claimed the gills were full of hydrocarbons. Is it oil? We don’t know, but people have to choose between catching and selling these shrimp or starving themselves. It’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation for them. And it’s causing tension in the community.
With the embargo on offshore drilling now lifted, it’s only a matter of time before the next such disaster, but by then our attention will have been drawn so far away that we might even forget that this ever happened…just like the last time.
Related Posts:
Recommended Reading
We’ve got a holiday weekend coming up here in the U.S., so here are some longer articles I’ve read recently that might give you something to peruse if you get bored with raking leaves or watching football.
This anonymous post at N+1 is a first-hand account of an expat working for the Chinese propaganda ministry during the 2008 Beijing Olympics. The author spent those two weeks dutifully transcribing every official announcement into English and posting it on the China Internet Information Center website, but in addition to mechanically publishing the usual official blahblahblah, the author found herself constantly under watch for any sign of anti-China sentiment and was expected to similarly scrutinize everything that was said by others. It’s an interesting glimpse into how carefully the Chinese government tried to control every single bit of media that came out of Beijing during the Olympics.
“The Lonely Crowd”, by David Riesman, Nathan Glazer and Reuel Denney is one of a series of sociological tomes that appeared in the 1950s and 1960s detailing the seismic changes in American society after World War II as people moved out to the suburbs and community life changed from shared experiences of tight-knit groups to greater and greater insularity and isolation. The 60th anniversary of the publication of the book received this retrospective in the Chronicle of Higher Education last month.
I also enjoyed this Wall St. Journal review by film critic Todd McCarthy of a new biography of the film director Cecil B. DeMille called “Empire of Dreams” (by Scott Eyman). The review begins with an interesting little anecdote about an encounter between DeMille and a young Ayn Rand, looking for her first writing job in Hollywood. McCarthy praises Eyman’s book for humanizing a figure who was regarded as imposing and imperial by his contemporaries, and whose directorial authoritarianism was the very foundation of our stereotype of the screaming movie director with the beret and megaphone. I love a book review that makes me want to read the book, and this did just that.
Former Army career officer, current BU history professor, and outspoke war critic Andrew Bacevich wrote this long piece for the Huffington Post back in July evaluating what he says is the failure of the Western model of war as a political tool, which he uses to criticize right-wing historian Francis Fukuyama, who notoriously declared that “history was over” after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. He also compares the seemingly-unending conflicts between Israel and its neighbors to the equally fruitless military adventurism of the United States in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bacevich turns his lens on himself a little in this second HuffPo article which ran at the end of August, explaining how his own experiences stationed in Berlin in the 1960s shifted his whole appreciation of the world and America’s foreign policy from one of unquestioning orthodoxy to skepticism and critical inquiry. Both articles are drawn from his latest book “Washington Rules: America’s Path To Permanent War”.
Related Posts:
The Keyboard Stylings of Johann Hari
Man, lately you can’t swing a dead cat without hitting an article by Johann Hari somewhere. If, by some chance, you have been swinging your dead cat and missing, Hari is a young British journalist, who rose to fame while at Cambridge about 10 years ago, and, like a lot of contemporary journos, is known for his political activism and advocacy as well as his writing. He’s won a bunch of awards including the 2008 George Orwell Prize for political writing and the 2010 Martha Gelhorn Prize for war reporting.
Personally, I rather like his writing. He’s a lot more versatile than some older and well-established political journalists, but a lot less “watch me, I’m amazing” than people like Malcolm Gladwell. Here are thee recent articles in three different publications which give you a sense of his versatility:
This review in the New York Times of a new biography of Winston Churchill looks at the fundamental contradiction of Churchill’s own Victorian/Edwardian worldview versus the repudiation of the very same ideals as re-interpreted by Nazism decades later and Churchill’s seeming embrace of democratic ideals in response.
At his regular gig as a commentator for the British newspaper The Independent, Hari looks back at the Good Old Days of the 1990s and 2000s and the way management consultancy firms basically bullshitted their way to extreme profitability and helped to created the failed corporations that litter the landscape today.
And at The Huffington Post, he has this depressing piece that sort of restates an obvious situation: global warming is getting worse, but nobody is really willing to do a damn thing about it, even if they aren’t busy denying its very existence.
Related Posts:
L’Affaire Thomas
Over at The Huffington Post today, contributor Mike Green opines that Jon Stewart ought to be given a Pulitzer Prize for his segment about the Helen Thomas brouhaha last week:
Green’s article amplifies the basic point Stewart makes: that the Washington press corps has completely given itself over to the political establishment to the extent that they no longer function in even the slightest way as independent journalists. Honestly, I think it’s a bit telling that the Stewart clip is so effective that Greene’s supporting written arguments end up having that “tl;dr” vibe about them, but maybe that’s part of the actual problem.
Frankly, I think it’s incredibly sad that this is how Helen Thomas’s career closed out, and hopefully the transitory nature of these sorts of news items means that this will be seen for the dross that it really is. I hope they do give Jon Stewart a Pulitzer Prize, and, if they do, that he dedicates it to her.




