Tag illegal war

A Trillion Better Ways To Spend A Trillion Dollars

pennypyramid.jpg

Back In January, I posted this NYT graphic which demonstrates how George Bush has managed to squander away $1.2 TRILLION dollars with his unnecessary war.

Today at Dangerous Intersection, Erich Vieth posts about some of the other things that could have been done with all that money, such as giving every single man, woman and child in the United States $3,000.00 to reinvest in the economy, or, better still, giving EVERY HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET $150.00. While $150 might be thought of as chump change in this country, the average Bangladeshi only earns $380 a year, and the average annual income in Ethiopia is only $141.00.

In the comments of that post, “grumpypilgrim” (one of the other regular authors of that site) has a collection of factoids about trying to imagine the sheer amount of one trillion dollars. A one-trillion stack of dollars, he tell us, would weigh more than BOTH of the World Trade Center towers and would be 55,000 miles tall (about 20% of the distance from the Earth to the Moon). One trillion dollars would build more than 200 Nimitz-class aircraft carriers (the U.S. Navy has 10).

Meanwhile, over at the Boston Globe, there’s this photo essay that considers what you could do with $456 billion, which is what this group says the war has cost so far. Considering that it’s only about a third of the amount John Allen Poulos is citing, the possibilities are still staggering: nearly 3000 first-class high schools, free gasoline for every car in the United States for fourteen months, 30 civil engineering projects of the scale of the Big Dig, feeding and educating the world’s poor for FIVE years.

The mind boggles.

Comments:
Dr. Ron Paul, a congressman from Texas and a candidate for president has consistently voted against the invasion of Iraq since 1998, when the possibility was first presented to the US congress.

Unlike most of the Democratic front runners and all of the Republicans, Ron Paul has never allowed himself to be fooled by the nefarious neocon fear tactics.

I’m not suggesting that any loyal Democrat vote for Ron Paul in the general election. However, there is a real opportunity to slap some sense into the Republican base on the horizon, and us Libertarians could use a hand.

Following the Republican “debates” ABC News posted an online poll invitation that omitted Ron Paul while including Fred Thompson (who wasn’t even there and hasn’t announced!)

After a few hours and a few thousand emails, ABC News corrected their blunder and Ron Paul won their informal poll, as he did similar polls from other major media. Despite that, the popular media refuses to recognize his message, potential, and the number of supporters he already has.

When you look at online venues that are more in touch with the minds of the people, you’ll find all the makings of a grass roots campaign that’s being ignored by the establishment.

Again, I’m not asking any loyal Democrat to vote for Ron Paul, but if you’d like to make a little noise and perhaps piss of the the neocons…

Please feel free to Join Us in the Republican primary!
Posted by bob [URL] on 05/07/07

Good luck with that, Bob.

Personally, I think Ron Paul is a looney.
Posted by Brian [URL] on 05/07/07

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

W-A-R: We Are Responsible

war.jpg

Bad week to be a warmonger, eh?

Earlier in the week, British cabinet minister Hilary Benn told an American audience that it’s time to stop using the moniker “Global War On Terror”, because it makes “a small number of loose, shifting and disparate groups who have relatively little in common” feel more powerful than they really are. While a spokesman for Tony Blair wouldn’t endorse Benn’s remarks, the mouthpiece offered some lame equivocation.

(It’s not the first time a senior official has pooh-poohed the “GWOT” label, either, if you’ll recall)

Now Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has publicly told the president that he thinks “the war is lost.” While Reid deserves some credit for being willing to say this and let himself be quoted publicly, his late awakening to something that has been painfully obvious for years is not unlike being the guy who told Custer “there sure are a lot of Indians”.

I actually think the rest of the Democrats should get on this bandwagon. Not simply because the war IS lost, but because it gives them some degree of plausible deniability for being gutless, spineless toads when they all voted to approve military action before the war began. “We gave you approval, and you’ve failed, now it’s time to go,” shifts the focus of attention back on the Bush Administration’s incompetence and doesn’t leave them looking quite so slippery…just stupid. In fact, it even gives Republicans the same out and lets them put some distance between themselves and Chimpy in advance of 2008.

Of course, you could also go the semantic route. The author of this post at Dangerous Intersection would like us all to stop calling the conflict in Iraq a “war” at all. The actual “war, the blogger contends, ended a long time ago, and is more realistically a “military occupation”. This technical difference also gives the Democrats and anti-war Republicans a good way to redirect the focus and make some headway in extricating us: “We authorized the war, but not a prolonged occupation. Time to get out.”

Comments:
The other phrase I hate is the accusation that one’s actions or speech will “give comfort to the terrorists”. Is that something like bringing them a nice cup of cocoa and a warm blankie?

Fools.
Posted by flerdle [URL] on 04/21/07

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Bring Back The Taliban!

afghanistan.jpg

Remember Afghanistan? Oh, sure you do…that’s where Osama lives! That’s where we were going in and making the country safe for democracy and Jesus by kicking out the Taliban. Even the Democrats all say “We supported the war on Afghanistan! And we’re winning!”

Right. Like John McCain’s little stroll on the streets of Baghdad the other day, anyone who’s not wearing Dubya’s patented Rose Colored Glasses will tell you that the reality on the ground has very little to do with what our Loyal Media tells us.

In fact, speaking of the Loyal Media…the NPR junkies among you will remember a reporter named Sarah Chayes, who covered the European beat back in the 1990s. She left NPR back in 2002 and has spent the last five years in Afghanistan, managing local groups who are actually trying to rebuild Afghanistan rather than pave it over into a landing strip for invading Iran. This Boston Globe story from 2006 gives you some background on how she made that transition in her life.

Now that she’s not constrained by her position as a member of the news media, Chayes has turned into a very outspoken critic of the ongoing situation in Afghanistan, which the Bushies have conveniently forgotten about as they’ve turned their attentions elsewhere. In the latest issue of Boston Review, Chayes writes about the challenges of trying to rebuild a completely annihilated country — the rampant government corruption that hinders any humanitarian efforts, the continued military actions between the Taliban and “Coalition Forces”, and the ongoing fumble-bumbling of the American government. Most Kandaharis, she says, would be happy just for some functional local control, a point reconfirmed in this news article in the British paper The Independent, which says that local sentiment at this point would prefer the return of Taliban control just to improve the security situation that the “Coalition of the Willing” has been unable to manage.

I’d hate to see how bad things were if we weren’t WINNING the Global War On Terror.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

$1.2 TRILLION Dollars Spent For NOTHING

costofwar-sm.jpg
Click image for larger popup

Any fucking questions?

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site