Tag Lithuania

Remembering The Jewish World

A pair of articles that on the surface don’t have much to do with one another, but are an interesting glimpse into a lost world, the world inhabited by the Jews of Eastern Europe:

This first article, from the New York Review of Books, talks about the sad fate of the city of Vilnius during World War II. Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania, was also one of the most significant centers of Jewish learning and culture for hundreds of years. During its years controlled by the Russians, Jews were allowed a greater degree of freedom in Vilnius than in other European cities. That changed with the geopolitical struggles after World War I, but with the outbreak of war in 1939 and the Nazi-Soviet “Non-Agression Pact”, things got much worse, and once the Germans themselves invaded, tens of thousands of Jews in Vilnius were murdered. The NYRB article discusses a recent desecration of a memorial site and the official efforts in Lithuania to underplay the scope of the loss to the Jewish community.

This second story comes from The Paris Review and has a more personal approach. Written by the granddaughter of librettist Joseph Stein, it’s a look at the differences between the storybook world of the shtetl as told by Yiddish writer Sholem Aleichem (and especially as re-imagined for American audiences by her grandfather in “Fiddler On The Roof”) and the harsh world of the Pale, as well as the sometimes disappointing reality for Jews migrating from Eastern Europe to America.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Breaking Up Is Hard To Do

I guess the Serbs didn’t take the news of Kosovo’s “supervised independence” all that well, eh?

The Venn diagram above is one that’s been going around the web recently. It purports to explain the overlapping and intersecting identifications of people and places in the United Kingdom — for example, how you can be a Scotsman and a Briton at the same time. When Americans call people “British” they generally mean “English”, but while all Englishmen are British, not all Britons are Englishmen. Get it? Devolution is a big deal in the United Kingdom these days, as we’ve discussed here before. This recent article in The Guardian by journalist Iain McWhirter goes so far as to assert that the dissolution of the U.K. back into its constituent parts is now “inevitable”. The success of the SNP in wresting away political authority from Westminster is serving as a model for similar actions in Wales and Northern Ireland, and McWhirter argues that perhaps the best that London can hope for is some sort of federal system.

In the 1990s, the Soviet Union fell apart without a lot of effort once the Communist Party lost control in Moscow. While Russia and Byelorussia eventually kissed and made up, the rest of the nations that re-asserted themselves as independent states have moved on. Some, most notably the Baltic trio of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, quickly re-aligned with the West. Others simply replaced the brutal Soviet government with their own brutal dictatorships, and even the “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine has not completely reformed that country’s government. The tiny country of Georgia was one of the first to shed the Soviet yoke, but they have struggled with Russia for years because Georgia controls access to valuable ports and oil. Now the Georgian government has to deal with a breakaway minority of its own — Abkhazia (via). Abkhazia borders on the Black Sea, which is why the Russian government has kept a hand in this particular conflict. As the linked article states, the Kosovo declaration puts Georgia and the EU in a tough spot with regard to recognizing Abkhazia.

You may or may not recall this from late last year: the Native American tribes that collective are known as the Lakota have declared their independence from the United States and renounced all U.S. claims to their territory, which covers portions of North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana. As with the situations in Kosovo and Abkhazia, the stakes of other nations recognizing the validity of this claim to nationhood are pretty high but have been so low-balled by the U.S. government as to be almost meaningless.

But the Lakota are not the only ones talking about declaring independence. There’s an active secession movement in Vermont. Vermont was briefly an independent republic prior to becoming a state, and so the secessionists would call their country the “Second Vermont Republic”. That article also mentions in passing some secessionist groups in the Pacific Northwest, Texas (big surprise), and even California. And those are the ones who AREN’T the loonie gun-toting wackjobs!

The, of course, there’s that whole Red State Vs. Blue State thing:

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site