Tag London

NOT The Norwegian Blue

wild parakeet

A couple of years ago, there was a very charming and somewhat wistful film called “The Wild Parrots Of Telegraph Hill” that documented the flock of feral parrots that live in that section of San Francisco and Mark Bittner, the man who had devoted his energy, time, and effort to feeding and caring for the birds. I watched it when it aired on PBS in 2007 and recommend it if you have the chance to see it (some Googling leads me to believe that it is not viewable in its entirety on the web, but is readily available from movie rental services).

Similarly, there’s been some attention given to the flocks of feral parrots living in the New York boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens (though no movie, yet), and apparently there are flocks of escaped and feral parrots in Chicago and other American cities as well.

Now London joins the list of major cities with established populations of parrots. Unlike the American cities, though, the Brits are taking a tougher stance on the spread of the birds, since the number of birds seems to be exploding and parrots are popping up all over the English countryside. The British government made plans earlier this year to start culling the birds, which drew a lot of criticism from the very animal-friendly public. The birds are a protected species, but farmers are now allowed to trap and/or humanely destroy the birds and their eggs in areas where the birds threaten local fruit crops.

Here in Boston, there’s not much to speak of in terms of feral tropical birds, but we’ve already got our hands full with the Canada geese and the wild turkeys lurking everywhere.

P.S. The Monty Python reference in the title reminds me that I would be a bad blogger indeed not to mention that today, October 5, is the 40th anniversary of the premiere of “Monty Python’s Flying Circus”.

original python

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Can We Have A Do-Over Please?

This AP wire story sums up what I’ve been reading on a number of political blogs this week, namely that Michigan Senator Carl Levin has proposed a redistribution of the Democratic Party delegates from his state’s invalidated primary. Levin, who was the guy who caused the primary to be invalidated by going against DNC rules and scheduling it too early to try to get ahead of New Hampshire, is now responding to DNC Chairman Howard Dean’s call to wrap this all up by June. (Whether there will be any resolution to the situation with the Florida delegates remains to be seen)

At this stage I am sick to death of both of these two. I wasn’t crazy about either of them in the first place, and now I would sooner write in Zippy The Pinhead’s name than cast a ballot for Clinton or Obama. In the run-up to and subsequent run-away from the Pennsylvania primary, both candidates demonstrated what you might really expect from them as President of the United States. Hillary Clinton continues to position herself closer to John McCain with each passing day, while making use of some of Karl Rove’s shittiest playbook entries. Meanwhile, Obama’s beginning to get hopelessly boggged down in the Jeremiah Wright story, along with the usual racist bullshit about him, and his “exciting rhetoric” and “charisma” aren’t helping him “seal the deal” with voters.

So I guess the only reason to vote for either one of these two is because they “don’t suck as much as McCain.” Swell. That sure is a clarion call to leadership for the troubled times ahead.

I would like to officially send a request to Chairman Dean, Senators Clinton and Obama, and all the other Democratic candidates who “suspended” their campaigns in February: may we please have a do-over? One great big Second Chance Primary in all fifty states (plus Puerto Rico, D.C., Guam, and whoever else gets a shot), where we can wipe out all the delegate counts, skip the interminably stupid debates, forego any advertising or fundraising, and just have a “first-across-the-finish-line” race. Or maybe all of them could go on stage and sing in front of the American Idol judges (just as long as Paula Abdul is sober enough to tell the difference between one and two songs), or even do the Paso Doble on Dancing With The Stars (I would love to see Barack Obama dance with Cheryl Burke, or Dennis Kucinich do the jive with Anna Trebunskaya). Anything, anything, ANYTHING! but make us have to pick one of these two 3-D losers, only to have them lose to John “Batshit Insane” McCain…or worse, beat him.

Of course, it could be even worse…Londoners today have to choose between these two dorks for Mayor

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

The Endless City

Going on sale this week is a new book edited by London School of Economics professor Richard (Ricky) Burdett and Deyan Sudjic, director of London’s Design Museum, entitled “The Endless City”. The book consists of essays by urban planners and specialists examining the similarities and contrasts in the growth of six major world cities: New York, London, Shanghai, Mexico City, Johannesburg and Berlin.

Writing in yesterday’s Manchester Guardian, Sudjic considers the pressures on modern cities; 50% of the world’s population now lives in metropolitan areas, and by the middle of this century that number will rise to 75%. He also speaks in this podcast in Newsweek’s series on innovation.

From the descriptions, the book sounds a bit more aimed at the serious academic community than a popular audience, but would undoubtedly be interesting reading for anyone who has an interest. The Guardian piece seems like a good top-level summary if you just want the basic idea of it.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

How About A Statue Of A Pigeon?

London’s Trafalgar Square is framed by four plinths. Two of the plinths bear statues of famous English generals and one features a statue of King George IV, who was responsible for the monumental square being constructed in honor of Lord Nelson’s victory at Trafalgar. The fourth plinth was left empty for future use, and for a time was expected to feature a statue of King William IV, George IV’s brother and heir, but the funds could not be raised to pay for it. So the “Fourth Plinth” has been unused for the last 180 years or so, except for the occasional art exhibition. The pictures above are of the two most recent pieces to be displayed — a sculpture of a pregnant armless and legless woman, and a colored glass piece that is a model of a 21-story hotel.

Now, the Office of the Mayor of London, along with several other sponsors, has put up a website featuring the possible choices for the next artwork to be displayed on the Fourth Plinth and have invited the public to speak up for their favorite choice. The comments are not limited to just citizens of the U.K. as far as I can tell, so anyone can chime in.

Personally, I like this one. I suppose I’m being a bit pedestrian for liking the fact that it ties in thematically with Lord Nelson, but I think it’s clever. And I hope that if they ever get around to putting something on the plinth permanently that good old fashioned English sensibility kicks in and they put a proper Famous English Person on it. Maybe Madonna.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

“There Is No War On Terror”

I am late to the party on linking you to this story, but it also didn’t seem to get a huge amount of attention from the “MSM” when it was fresh: Sir Ken Macdonald, the head of the Crown Prosecution Service in the UK (sort of a national version of what we call “District Attorneys”) recently spoke to the British Criminal Bar Association and publicly repudiated the notion of a “war on terror”.

In the course of his remarks, Macdonald said that overzealous and “fear-driven” efforts to curtail civil rights represented a threat to the rule of law:

“It is critical that we understand that this new form of terrorism carries another more subtle, perhaps equally pernicious, risk. Because it might encourage a fear-driven and inappropriate response. By that I mean it can tempt us to abandon our values. I think it important to understand that this is one of its primary purposes.”

“London is not a battlefield…On the streets of London, there is no such thing as a ‘war on terror’, just as there can be no such thing as a ‘war on drugs’. The fight against terrorism on the streets of Britain is not a war. It is the prevention of crime, the enforcement of our laws and the winning of justice for those damaged by their infringement.”

Substitute American place names as appropriate, please. This message really needs to be heard widely and understood thoroughly. The only war is the one we started in Iraq for no valid reason whatsoever. How long can Americans propel themselves to undo the fundamentals of their own society based solely on the fear-driven response to a single incident?

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site