Tag Montreal

It’s Bucky’s World And We’re Just Living In It

One of the highlights of our Montreal vacation trip a couple of weekends ago was visiting the Biosphere. Okay, to be totally honest about it, the actual science exhibit part of the Biosphere is a bit on the lackluster side. Not for lack of trying, but because every exhibit was something we’d seen somewhere else. The reason I liked it was because it was an opportunity to get up close and personal with the giant geodesic dome that has been a fixture of the Montreal skyline since the 1967 World’s Fair. The dome was the centerpiece of the U.S. Pavilion during Expo 67 and became the iconic symbol of the fair. Over the years, though, the dome was simply left abandoned and its exterior covering eventually had to be taken off, leaving just the steel gridwork and the building inside. In the early 1990, the Canadian government rehabbed the building and Biosphere was born, but the dome was left open to the air, which is how it remains today.

The dome was the brainchild of R. Buckminster Fuller. Fuller was a philosopher, dreamer, visionary, designer, and sometimes hare-brained schemer who spent his life dedicated to the notion that life could be better for everyone if everyone embraced change and technology. In addition to designing the geodesic dome, he also designed the famed Dymaxion House, which was his vision of the “house of the future” (a very opposite vision of Frank Lloyd Wright’s “Usonian” house design of the same period), the Dymaxion Car, and designs for vast floating megacities.

Later, after his death, materials scientists would honor him by naming the nanostructure of a particular carbon molecule buckminterfullerene because its shaped resembled the geodesic dome. The entire family of these carbon molecules is now called “fullerenes”. And buckminsterfullerene is more popularly known as “Bucky Balls”. Many of the advances of nanotechnology have been made possible through the applied usage of bucky balls. Fuller’s principle of “tensegrity” (the force of objects pushing and pulling at each other simultaneously), which makes the geodesic dome possible, is also used in other applications, such as this new prosthetic foot design.

This week’s New Yorker has a feature story by Elizabeth Kolbert entitled “Dymaxion Man” about Fuller, his work and ideas, and a new exhibit at the Whitney Museum of Art in New York City about Fuller that opens this week and runs until mid-September. I’m hoping that maybe Bridget and I can get down to New York in August while Charlotte is at her grandparents’ house to see this exhibit.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Linkapalooza – Food

I think I’ve settled on “Linkapalooza” as a generic name for these posts. Today, it’s food links.

  • Somewhere recently I read a post on some food blog about how to properly store cheese (though I didn’t save the link), and it kept talking about using “cheese paper” to wrap the leftovers. I had never heard of “cheese paper”, but apparently they knew what they were talking about because this morning bookofjoe had a link to this site, which sells it. Cheese paper, it turns out, is basically wax paper with a gas-permeable film on the inside that lets the cheese breathe, extending its shelf life better than plastic wrap or even conventional wax paper. Zabar’s sells it for less than Formaticum does, but there’s no indication if Zabar’s sells it in the same quantity/size, so I don’t know if it’s a better deal or not. Here’s a link to a cheese blog (hey, why not?) with some alternate storing suggestions. If any of you have personal experience using real cheese paper, do tell.
  • My friend Jo pointed me to a blog about food safety (charmingly, if aptly, named BarfBlog), which in turn pointed to this USA Today article about the latest on the tomato salmonella panic. Turns out more than 10% 4% of the cases tied to this particular outbreak are people who all ate at the same fast food outlet. Big surprise there…NOT. Both the BarfBlog guy and the USA Today article point out that due to the rural nature of the population where the first outbreak was found, investigators had to do a lot of pavement-pounding and personal interviews to find out the sort of things they want to know, like where people had been eating out, so it took longer than it might in an urban area to dig up the necessary clues. And what exactly causes these salmonella outbreaks, you ask? Well, the migrant farm workers who pick the tomatoes are very often not given bathroom breaks or adequate sanitation facilities, and so they shit in the field, don’t wash afterwards, and go right back to picking tomatoes (or whatever).
  • A couple of weeks ago I ran across this Village Voice article about an “anti-energy” drink called “Drank”. Energy drinks are the new killer category in the beverage business, and it seems like there’s a new one every other day. I’ve only tried a couple of them, but have found those to be nasty tasting, horrible things, but the appeal to the youngsters is to mix them with alcohol and get the dual effect of being buzzed from caffeine and hammered from booze at the same time. Well, at least they’re not mainlining heroin, so that’s something, I guess. Anyway, while energy drinks are loaded with such bizarre ingredients as guarana (a highly-caffeinated seed) and taurine (which apparently has no energy-giving properties at all but is in Red Bull, so all the energy drinks *have* to have it), this “Drank” beverage has melatonin, valerian root, and rose hips, all of which are traditional sleep-inducing or relaxation-inducing substances. The marketing tag for “Drank” is “slow your roll”, and it sounds like this would do just that. In the process of chasing links for “Drank”, I learned that it takes its name from a homemade intoxicant that is made with codeine-based cough syrup and is popular among the Houston, TX hip-hop scene (which, not surprisingly, is where the soft drink is primarily sold). I guess if they can sell an energy drink called “Cocaine”, why not one called “Drank”.
  • One of the highlights of our trip to Montral last weekend was having lunch at the famed Schwartz’s Deli on Rue St. Laurent. The deli is about as tightly packed a space as any you might encounter: there is a line of tables along one wall, each of which seats five or six people, there’s also a service counter with stools, and a take-out area, all of which leaves not quite enough room for the waiters to squeeze down the middle with the plates. Plus, there is usually a line out the door and down the block, and the place is never empty. While we were waiting for our lunch on Sunday, I read a couple of newspaper articles from 2004 that were posted on the wall. Apparently at that time the owners were considering opening a second location in a different part of downtown Montreal, but ultimately rejected the idea, much to the disappointment of many Montrealers. Now there’s news that they are going to acquire the empty storefront next door to them and expand the original store. (via) That’s probably a better plan anyway, and I will definitely look forward to having a little more elbow room the next time I visit.
  • This Mother Jones article talks about how market speculators are already swooping in for a big score by buying up food commodity futures and waiting for the inevitable global food shortage to set in hard. Caiptalism destroys everything, my friends, and cares not a whit for the consequences. Who cares if millions of people starve, as long as somebody made a buck on it. Fuckers.

CORRECTION: I’ve corrected the figure of the number of people who caught salmonella from one particular fast food chain. I misremembered the figure, but have since found the NYT citation. Thanks for the heads-up, Shelley! — BK

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

O, Canada!

I posted quite a few photos over on my Flickr account, so I won’t offer too much of a travelogue, just some assorted impressions and observations.

We stayed at the Hyatt Regency, which turned out to be remarkably well-located for us. It’s right on top of one of the malls of the Underground City, including a Metro station. We used the Metro extensively on Sunday, going all the way out to Olympic Park, then back into the city to go to Schwartz’s Deli for lunch and then out to Parc Jean-Drapeau to go to the Biosphere. By the end of the day, we were exhausted, but at least we knew that once we got off the subway we were basically at our hotel. It was also easy walking to the Basilica Notre Dame and from there to the rest of Old Montreal/Old Port. The downtown isn’t as compact as Boston (though much more accommodating for automobiles), but isn’t as far removed from other parts of the city as midtown Manhattan is from other parts of New York. The northern part of the island has very little of interest to tourists.

We had absolutely no problem being primarily English speakers. We did not encounter a single waiter, cashier, ticket taker, shopkeeper, or anyone else who did not speak and understand English easily (although some people had some pretty thick Quebec accents). The trick was to say “Hello” instead of “Bonjour” whenever greeted, and this is the cue for the other person to speak English. Clearly, though, this is limited to the city itself. On Monday we drove out towards Sherbrooke to a water park before heading home (about 45 minutes from the city), and the park employees spoke little to no English at all. Later, stopping for lunch at a restaurant near the park, we were once again faced with a waitress who spoke no English and whom I could not understand well enough in French to get a couple of service questions she asked. My comprehension of French is good enough to be able to handle most brief interactions like ordering from a menu or reading instructions, but I just could not make heads or tails of what the waitress was asking. I presume there was some degree of Quebecois idiom involved that was outside my limited knowledge. Overall, though, it was far less intimidating to be in Montreal as an English speaker than it was in Paris, and we did not encounter any of the “I speak English but won’t do it for you” bullshit that used to be the Francophone reaction to Americans in Montreal.

I sweated A LOT. Montreal has a reputation for humid summer weather, and Saturday was a prime example. It was in the low 80s, hazy with periods of overcast, but the dew point must have been 75 degrees. All day long I looked like I had just gotten out of the shower (or needed to get into one quick). We would go into some air-conditioned place and cool off, then go back out and get sweaty all over again. In this particular photo, I have just emerged from a 30-minute multimedia show in the Basilica Notre Dame, which is NOT air conditioned. The weather was better on Sunday, but several of the indoor attractions we visited were hot and humid — the Amazon Rainforest exhibit at the Biodome might as well have been a steam bath, and the aquatic center at the Olympic Stadium was also purposefully warm and humid, though not quite as intensely so.

Yes, Schwartz’s Deli is every bit as good as they say. We went in the middle of the afternoon on Sunday, so we did not have to wait the customary hour for a table, even though the place was still full. We only waited maybe five minutes and shared a table with a young couple to fill it out. I ordered the small plate of the famed smoked meat and still could barely finish it. The smoked meat is beef brisket, but it’s not corned beef. It’s dry rubbed and cured like pastrami. It was simply delicious. Plus, the restaurant is air conditioned.

Bridget never did man up and order poutine, even though it is a routine menu item wherever french fries are served. She kept calling it “putain”, and I would have loved to have seen her ask some fast food worker for THAT.

The Bateau Mouche boat ride was probably the least scenic boat ride I have ever taken, but we really just needed to sit down someplace cool for an hour, and it fit the bill. If you are hot and your feet are tired, take the boat ride. Otherwise, it was the most skippable thing we did all weekend.

The tour of the Olympic Stadium was interesting, but the stadium itself is very depressing. It’s almost never used anymore because the roof collapsed from the weight of too much snow during an auto show a few years ago. It’s too expensive to maintain, impossible to insure, and too large for the lackluster professional sports teams in Montreal. So it sits empty most of the time, with only a small handful of expo shows during the good weather. I remember watching hour after hour of the 1976 Olympics and the crowds in the stadium for the track and field events and wishing so hard that I could be there. It was a weird and sad experience, but I’m very glad we took the tour.

On the tour of the tower, Charlotte and I were with a group of elderly New Zealanders. It must have been their first stop in Montreal, because they didn’t seem to know anything about the rest of the city. There were no tour guides on the observation deck, and I ended up fielding all sorts of questions from the Kiwis. “Where’s that American fella? Ask him what that building is!”

Necessary French vocabulary I picked up: at Starbucks all I needed to know was “venti glace”, though elsewhere it’s “cafe glace” or just “glace” (as long as you’re in a coffee shop). Lots of places serve “moka glace” or “cappucino glace”, but what you get is more like a milkshake than a coffee drink. At the water park we learned that “changing room” is “salle de deshabillage”. All sherbet and sorbet is just “sorbet”, but sherbet is “sorbet de laitier”. “Queue de Castor” is a unique Canadian confection which translates to “beaver tail” in English. It’s a big piece of fried dough topped with gooey sweet stuff like chocolate and bananas, fruit toppings, and so on. How this has not spread here to New England, where we get a ton of Quebec tourists in the summer, is a total mystery.

We really had a very good time. I think we managed to hit most of the family-friendly destinations, so we might until Charlotte’s a little older before we go back, but I’d love to go back for one of the bajillion festivals they have during the summer. Next time, though, I’m bringing an economy-pack of sweatbands and double the number of shirts.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Wherever You Go, There You Are

Bridget, Charlotte and I are headed up to the Great White North tomorrow for a four-day getaway to Montreal. We had a great time on our last visit to New York City back in February, but it was recent enough that we felt like we wanted to go someplace different. Montreal is just about the same distance from Boston as New York, so it’s enitrely drivable in four or five hours, which makes a big difference when you’re travelling with a little kid.

I asked around at several of my online haunts for recommendations of things to see and do that would be appropriate for small children. You can always tell if someone has a kid or not by the things they seem to think are kid-appropriate. Pro tip: titty bars on Rue St. Catherine — not appropriate. But there were a few suggestions that a little research did confirm as perfect. We’ll probably spend most of Saturday afternoon at the Biodome. That’s near the Olympic Park and you can even include tickets to go up inside the tower that holds the roof over Olympic Stadium as part of the price of admission. On Sunday we’ll check out the Old Port and Old Montreal. Within the two adjoining areas there are some museums, historical sites, and various outdoor events, so I expect it will be possible to spend just about all day (with time off for good behavior). With these little trips, it is simply impossible to do more than hit a couple of significant attractions, so we’ll have to be satisfied with those and leave some of the other must-do Montreal attractions for another visit.

I’d like to find something interesting for Saturday evening. The Montreal Fringe Festival begins this weekend, but it’s hard to know what, if anything, would be kid-appropriate. We’re not very uptight about a lot of things, but sometimes the vibe of “alternative” theater is a little more than I’d want my little girl to see. An online acquaintance happens to be involved with one of the productions, and even he wasn’t sure which things might be okay. We might just have to take our chances…or skip it entirely in favor of some other event.

I also need to put a little thought into where we might like to try to eat. Montreal is a world-class restaurant city, but circumstances will insist that we scale down our gastronomic expectations. I refuse to go away for a weekend and eat in crap chain restaurants or Le Poulet Frit Kentucky, but it is usually possible to find interesting places that won’t refuse you service because you have a kid with you. Bridget wants to make sure we go to a poutine palace, so I suppose we’ll have to do that. And I do want to visit Schwartz’s Deli; Montreal is famous for having great delis and bagel shops, and Schwartz’s is like the Katz’s Deli of Montreal.

To help us flesh out our itinerary a bit, we bought a copy of the Rough Guide to Montreal. On our trip to Europe a few years ago, we found the DK series of travel books to be the most suited to our interests, but we couldn’t find a DK book about Montreal at our local Barnes & Noble. So after a bit of grousing, we settled for the Rough Guide. This morning, though, this comparison chart from GOOD Magazine specifically refers to the Rough Guide Montreal book as being only so-so. If we were going on a longer expedition and were really going to do some serious exploring, I’d probably go back and look for a better guide book. The guide book they liked best, City Secrets, only covers four cities and none of them are Montreal, but I’d probably search harder for the DK books.

Photos a plenty will be taken, I’m sure, but you’ll have to wait until late next week for them to appear on my Flickr page. If you’ve got any Montreal suggestions, especially for good restaurants, speak up quickly.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Back To The Future

expo67.jpg

Last Friday marked the 40th anniversary of the opening of Montreal’s Expo 67, a landmark moment in modern Canadian history, and ranking right up there with the Chicago World’s Fair of 1893 and the New York World’s Fair of 1939 as iconic symbols of their times.

Montreal City Weblog has a post with a few links to some archival material. The Expo and the Summer Olympics nine years later were controversial projects often held with great critical disdain by the people of Montreal, but the balm of time has helped to turn them into proud memories.

(Here’s another very comprehensive Expo 67 site I found but it’s very slow to load. Worth the wait for the pictures of almost everything, but do be patient.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site