Tag municipal WiFi

I Fi, You Fi, We All Fi For WiFi

A couple of links worth reading:

A few years ago, many American cities and towns made a big deal about efforts to bring free municipal WiFi to their residents and visitors, but, like a lot of promises made by overzealous politicians, there hasn’t been nearly as much follow-through as one might have hoped. According to this website, there are now 84 municipalities and counties that offer hotspots or widespread WiFi (as of June 2010). This recent MIT Technology Review post says that it wasn’t so much a political problem that kiboshed municipal WiFi, even with the Great Recession and all; instead, it was a much bigger technical problem than even supporters initially believed, caused in large part by the limitations on WiFi signals imposed by the FCC when they authorized the technology.

Meanwhile, I’m sure anyone who has traveled with a laptop in the last several years has had this experience: you are in an airport/hotel lobby/conference center with your laptop, looking to score one of those aforementioned not-so-prevalent free WiFi hotspots so you can check your e-mail and maybe hit The Twitter. Your laptop looks around and finds a few secure networks, but staring at you in the list is something called “Free Public WiFi”. So, since people are totally incapable of resisting anything with the word “free” in it, you click…and nothing happens. This Lifehacker post explains that you are, in fact, being punked by your own laptop, and how, in some circumstances, you are potentially letting some unscrupulous individual connect directly to your computer (or at the very least, giving them a big fat invitation to do so).

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Linkapalooza – Tech

Take a look at your next laptop’s 80GB hard drive. Yes, I said hard drive. Intel has just announced their solid-state hard drive product line beginning with this drive, called the X25-M. You can’t quite tell from this photo, but the form factor is designed around the 2.5-inch width that current laptop arm-and-platter disk drives use. However, it’s only as thick and as heavy as a typical chip-bearing circuit board, which is to say significantly less than traditional disk drives. This model has 80GB of storage, but Intel’s roadmap has 160GB models in the marketplace by early 2009, and smaller models available even sooner. The throughput performance of this drive is better than most current shipping 80GB laptop drives, and Intel claims that the lifespan of the drive should be five years (a complaint about flash-based drives to date has been the relatively small number of read-write cycles, but they claim to have worked around that). Because they are so efficient on I/O, solid-state drives are likely to be very quickly adopted for use in servers, enabling server hardware to shrink even more and reducing the likelihood of server downtime due to mechanical failures.

Now that the XM-Sirius merger is a done deal, the next thing to think about with regard to satellite radio is interoperability. In other words, making it possible for XM radios to receive Sirius signals and vice versa without making all their customers go out and buy new hardware. The FCC has already ruled that any new satellite radio receivers must be interoperable, but now they’ve put out a Notice Of Inquiry to decide whether or not satellite radios must also be interoperable with terrestrial HD radio. Ibiquity, Clear Channel, and NPR have all lobbied the FCC to mandate including HD Radio interoperability, but the FCC would only go so far as to launch the NOI, which starts a somewhat lengthy review process. This is not unlike the deliberations in the 1970s to compel radio makers to include the FM band on every radio; FM radio was the bald-headed stepchild of radio for decades because no one had FM receivers. Once FM popped up alongside AM on car radios, FM stations finally caught on, eventually pushing AM radio into obsolescence. A lesson no doubt everyone involved in this melodrama remembers all too well.

The idea of using bar-code technology with your hand-held communication device has been around for a while, but has only just now turned into an actual service of some kind. USA Today reports that Air France will start letting passengers travelling from Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris to Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam opt to receive their boarding passes as bar-code images or as text messages on their smartphones. Quite honestly, I don’t think this is such a great idea for airline boarding passes because of the ENORMOUS security risks it poses. Far better that this had been introduced as a service for something with a lot less inherent risk like movie tickets or supermarket deli waiting line numbers. It’s somewhat telling that Air France is only testing it on one route rather than their entire system, and I suspect that this will be slow to roll out, particularly with U.S. air carriers.

DSL Reports says that the number of consumers signing up for DSL service continues to free fall into nothingness. “DSL is the new dial-up” is the catchphrase du-jour in the broadband business as Verizon’s FiOS fiber-optical service has pushed cable companies to be more aggressive with their speed enhancements, leaving pokey ol’ DSL in the dust. According to that linked story, Verizon and AT&T together had a net LOSS of about 120,000 DSL customers in the second fiscal quarter. Anything that keeps the broadband market in the U.S. aiming toward the 100Mbps speed that’s standard in Korea and Japan is okay with me.

I’m not holding my breath, but this story from MuniWireless.com says that Boston is one of the cities where Sprint expects to rollout WiMax as municipal wireless service maybe even before the end of 2008. The rollout is underway right now in Baltimore, with over 1000 wireless access points in the city. Chicago and Washington DC are expected to be launched before the end of the year, and then the next tier of cities includes Philadelphia, Dallas, and The Hub Of The Universe itself. Seems they’ve figured out how to speed up the process of getting the WAPs out into the field so that they can place up to 25 per day, making the rollouts go much faster than originally projected.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Pahk The Cah In Hahvud Yahd

Now THIS is a technology whose time is WAAAAAY overdue: the City of San Francisco is pilot testing a program to use an array of sensors embedded in the streets that can determine parking availability, then share that data over a meshed wireless network that can be accessed online so that you can get a reasonably accurate idea of where you can find a place to park. The picture above shows how the data can be plugged into Google Maps to display the parking availability on a block-by-block basis. The program uses different kinds of sensors to determine the density of parked cars (though they primarily rely on magnetic sensors), but the actual sensor arrays are small, and the combination of sensors means that they could also be used to relate other types of real-time data like pedestrian density, micro-climate data, and more.

I would pay almost anything to have this information available on my GPS. I cannot tell you how many hours of my time I have wasted trolling for parking, particularly in Harvard Square and its immediate surroundings. Not to mention the number of times I have just bitten the bullet and parked in a permit-only space knowing that there would be a ticket on my windshield when I got back, but having little other choice. The article also mentions that the developers are hoping that they’ll also be able to develop an algorithm that will predict parking availability for some point in the immediate future; say you want to know where you might find a space within a block of your destination sometime between 2:00 and 2:15. Wouldn’t THAT just be the cat’s ass?

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

FREE As In Beer

I’ve posted a couple of times about the “Nintendo Fan Network” wireless system that Nintendo tested out last year at Safeco Field in Seattle and also a similar system being tested at DisneyWorld in Florida.

Today, Engadget reports that Safeco Field will offer the service for free this season. Previously, there was a $5.00 fee to use the service; given how much everything else costs at a professional sporting event, it’s pretty amazing that they’ve eliminated the charge instead of jacking it up to $15-20, but, as Chris Anderson wrote in Wired a couple of months ago, in the end anyone providing these kind of services will find themselves giving away the service in order to make money on the extras (the old “give away the razor, make the money on the blades” theory that has served Gillette so well for decades).

To wit: a few weeks ago none other than the mighty Starbucks itself said that they would stop charging for WiFi (sort of), after soaking people for $6 a whack for several years. The service has been spotted in the wild in at least one city, and will take them the rest of 2008 to roll out to every store. In cities like New York, which seem to have a Starbucks every 100 fet, this is as good as having municipal WiFi. I hope they hit the Boston stores soon, because Boston’s own municipal WiFi has more or less gone tits-up.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

HotSpot Or Not

The tech story of the day is unquestionably this InfoWorld story that quotes Ericsson’s Chief Marketing Officer Johan Bergendahl saying that WiFi hot spots are yesterday’s news and are about to be surpassed by mobile broadband.

As most of the tech press and blogs have been quick to point out, however, Ericsson just happens to be trying to promote their own particular flavor of mobile broadband as the new standard for cell phones and other wireless devices. So, you might need to consider anything their Chief Marketing Officer says as being a little bit biased.

At CNet News.com, Marguerite Reardon has a bit of a rebuttal for some of Bergendahl’s claims. Her argument is not that Bergendahl is wrong, he’s just a bit ahead of himself. As I myself have learned recently, carrying around my iPod Touch, WiFi hot spots are not always where you want them to be, and offer essentially no quality-of-service guarantee. Municipal WiFi initiatives have been slow to take off or have been left half-finished, so there’s no public WiFi infrastructure to speak of. But, the overall footprint of WiFi is improving, and the cost for using it keeps coming down (as the recent Starbucks announcement demonstrates), and the install base of laptops and handheld devices with WiFi is already very large and likely to keep growing, especially since the “3G” mobile broadband folks are still arguing over standards and charging exorbitant rates for usage. In fact, the network effect (no pun intended) of WiFi is already so well along that it might hamstring any effort to supplant it with mobile broadband unless mobile broaband can offer a very strong case for getting people to switch.

Bergendahl is not the only person to make this claim, though. A few weeks ago I read this opinion piece at the British tech website IT Pro saying basically the same thing. It’s worth observing, I think, that because the cellular service business is so much more competitive and robust in Europe and the U.K. than it is in the U.S., it IS probably more likely that mobile broadband will expand its reach faster there and have a better chance of supplanting WiFi than it will here.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site