
After the war, Adolph and Eva settled in Cleveland and could be seen riding the bus every Tuesday to go to the senior center for bingo-and-beer night
Boy, howdy people can’t get enough of Hitler. I hear the reason Dick Cheney brought out his new book recently was because he was afraid Hitler was getting all the good PR. Heck, it’s only recently that the History Channel stopped with their 24-7 schedule of Hitler documentaries in favor of their new 24-7 schedule of episodes of “Pawn Stars”, and *I* heard they asked Chumlee to lose the goatee and grow that little mustache.
So here is your Daily Dose of Dolph:
The news magazine The National Interest reviewed a new scholarly biography of Eva Braun in their latest issue. Because she had no public role in the world of the Third Reich, not much was known about her during the Hitler years, and little had been written about her since except as she appeared in episodes of his life. Indeed, just reading the review will assuredly increase your knowledge about her tenfold, even if you never even remotely consider reading the book. As the reviewer, Richard J. Evans, concludes, the larger issue about developing a better understanding of Braun is that it forces a re-examination of Hitler himself as a real human being and not as the Ultimate Monster of History, and that seems to still be beyond the conceptualization of many.
So that’s a good way to segue to this book review in The New Republic by Monica Osborne, looking at a book by Rudolph Herzog that examines political humor in Germany in the 1930s and the way that Hitler was generally portrayed as a laughing stock during the early part of his rise to power, and continued to be played for laughs by Allied war propaganda even though the knowledge of the unfolding terror committed by the Nazis was fairly widespread. The book also considers the use of Hitler humor in the post-war period; it is safe to say that Mel Brooks would probably not have a career without Hitler to kick around. How we choose to use humor to deal with the horrors of modern life is a provocative question, certainly.









