Tag New York Times

Guess The Future

Harvard Law professor and Congressional reform champion Lawrence Lessig is interviewed in the latest edition of Boston Review as part of promoting his new book, Republic Lost. If the book title doesn’t give it away, it should: his take on the political situation in this country is that we are in serious danger of reaching a tipping point where our democracy is completely lost to the big money interests that dominate Congress. Despite the seriousness of the situation, it’s clear that Lessig thinks that real reform of the system is stil possible, and that populist movements like the Tea Party and OWS are capable of working together to accomplish some of their common goals. Be sure to have a look at the website for his activist group, Rootstrikers.org.

Keep Lessig’s interview in mind when reading this next link, an op-ed in Sunday’s NYT from Jeffrey Sachs, the director of Columbia University’s Earth Institute. The piece is entitled “The New Progressive Movement” and argues nothing less than that the successes of OWS hallmark the dawn of a new era of progressive reform, the swing of the pendulum of American history back away from the counter-reform of the last three decades. The optimism in Sachs’s editorial is a lot sunnier than Lessig’s, and honestly, I feel like you have to go with “it’s always darkest before the dawn” and see that Lessig’s argument that we are not *quite* where Sachs says we are is the more realistic outlook to have. (But, as you well know, I am a glass-half-empty man from way back.) Still, it’s reassuring that even at this point there are Serious People who believe that all is not lost.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Sadly, This Does Little For My Self-Esteem

This just in: ThinkProgress cites a new poll conducted by the New York Times that shows that public approval of the Tea Party has dropped below the always-disappointingly low rating for atheists. Interactive poll results here.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Miscellaneous Links

The Vasa Museum in Stockholm, Sweden is dedicated to the preservation and exhibition of a 17th century sailing ship, the Vasa, built as a testament to the magnificence of King Gustaf II Adolf, but which became a symbol of hubris and failure as it sank on its maiden voyage, only a few hundred feet from its launching site. The Awl’s contributor Elisabeth Donnelly writes about the experience of visiting the museum in that trademark Awl snark.

And speaking of monuments to magnificence and astonishing hubris, this article from The Paris Review by Misha Glouberman (and Sheila Heti) talks about what it’s like to be an undergrad at Harvard from the perspective of someone coming from outside of the social strata of American society (the author is Canadian) but with a keen understanding of what the real import of a Harvard education is (hint: it ain’t WHAT you know). Nicely candid and insightful, an insider-outsider’s POV without being too cynical about its subject.

Journalist/author Dudley Clendinen was diagnosed with ALS last year and has written this touching and honest commentary about his condition, coming to terms with not only the progression of the disease but also its inevitable conclusion, and his decision to end his life at the point where he feels the debilitation might become too much to keep on going. He has also been doing a series of conversations about his disease for Maryland Public Radio, which I haven’t listened to yet but might be worth a go.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

I’ll Take Potpourri For $200, Alex

The San Francisco Chronicle had this profile of “Dirty Jobs” host Mike Rowe recently. Nothing new or revelatory, but interesting if you’re a fan of the show. We are big Dirty Jobs fans around here, but I have to admit that even I was pretty close to tuning out during the episode with the forensic entomologists.

From the Unclear On The Concept files: Friendly Atheist’s Hemant Mehta made me chuckle with this video clip of a Catholic priest on FOX News saying “If you have an imaginary friend, there’s something wrong with you.”

Anyone travelling the globe will instantly recognize the complete necessity of this website: Where Do I Put The Paper.com Let’s just say that I was more than a little surprised about the custom in several countries I would have ordinarily assumed to be “flush” cultures.

After reading this Prose Before Hos post, you might want to reconsider putting a buck in the Salvation Army buckets. CharityNavigator.org is a useful online guide to finding more suitable outlets for your giving.

A blog from a South Carolina law firm that ordinarily focuses on product liability issues recently offered up a post that looks at a New York Times article from 1931 soliciting opinions of the Future World of 2011 from such luminaries of the day as Henry Ford, Dr. William J. Mayo, Nobel-winning physicist Arthur Compton, and anthropologist Arthur Keith. As usual with any look back at these “predicting the future” articles from the past, there are plenty of things laughably wrong as well as presciently correct, though mainly in the “not so much” category. No mention of tinfoil suits, flying cars, or food in pill-form, so bonus points to them for that.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

The Keyboard Stylings of Johann Hari

Man, lately you can’t swing a dead cat without hitting an article by Johann Hari somewhere. If, by some chance, you have been swinging your dead cat and missing, Hari is a young British journalist, who rose to fame while at Cambridge about 10 years ago, and, like a lot of contemporary journos, is known for his political activism and advocacy as well as his writing. He’s won a bunch of awards including the 2008 George Orwell Prize for political writing and the 2010 Martha Gelhorn Prize for war reporting.

Personally, I rather like his writing. He’s a lot more versatile than some older and well-established political journalists, but a lot less “watch me, I’m amazing” than people like Malcolm Gladwell. Here are thee recent articles in three different publications which give you a sense of his versatility:

This review in the New York Times of a new biography of Winston Churchill looks at the fundamental contradiction of Churchill’s own Victorian/Edwardian worldview versus the repudiation of the very same ideals as re-interpreted by Nazism decades later and Churchill’s seeming embrace of democratic ideals in response.

At his regular gig as a commentator for the British newspaper The Independent, Hari looks back at the Good Old Days of the 1990s and 2000s and the way management consultancy firms basically bullshitted their way to extreme profitability and helped to created the failed corporations that litter the landscape today.

And at The Huffington Post, he has this depressing piece that sort of restates an obvious situation: global warming is getting worse, but nobody is really willing to do a damn thing about it, even if they aren’t busy denying its very existence.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

There’s A Word For That

The “Times Topics” blog at the New York Times has posted its second annual analysis of the most frequently looked-up words used in the paper over the last year. You can download a PDF with the entire list of fifty high-falutin’ vocab choices from that article, but BuzzFeed.com was nice enough to post a JPEG of the top 25, which I have for you right here:

The only word on the list that I could not define was “baldenfreude”, but I was relieved to find out from the blog author that it’s not a real word in the first place; it’s a neologism (or, as he calls it, a “nonce word”) made up by Maureen Dowd as a personal dig at NBC President Jeff Zucker (who is bald) about the whole Leno-v-Conan fiasco, borrowing from the German word “schadenfreude”. It’s not a particularly good “nonce word” and is probably best left forgotten from here on out. (Compare that to the tale of the word “malamanteau”, as recently coined by the web comic “xkcd”)

Now, if you want some SERIOUS vocab stumpers, take a look at this list of uncommon English words. Out of the 150 words on that list, I only knew five of them.

And just because I have been sitting on this link waiting for an opportunity to use it, here is a webpage with some particularly obnoxious German compound nouns and the rules for creating them, plus what some English terms might look like if subject to German grammatical constructs. Not too likely to appear in the New York Times, unless Maureen Dowd needs to make another crappy joke.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site