
So, I just read this post by one of the contributors at Mental Floss, where she did a little quick figuring to address the question of how likely it is that anyone from a given state in the U.S. will be from that state’s largest city. In other words, if you’re from New York, how likely is it that you’re from New York City?
In the case of New York and NYC, it’s actually almost a 50-50 proposition that a New Yorker is also a New Yorker, if you follow me. But she looked at a bunch of cities and has posted the results for your interest.
Somehow, she left Boston off the list. Tragic oversight, obviously. So here I am to fill in the gaps for you.
The City of Boston’s estimated population as of 2005 is roughly 559,000 people (and you thought Boston was A LOT bigger, didn’t you?). The population of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts was 6,437,193 in 2006. you can do your own math, but the answer is that only 8.68% of the people who live in Massachusetts are residents of Boston.
Which seems to fly in the face of reason, right? Well, that’s because most of us who “live in Boston” actually live in the Greater Boston Metropolitan Area, our grandparents having had the good sense to flee the city decades ago in favor of such charming burbs as Everett, Randolph, and the like.
According to that Wikipedia link, these days the reach of the Greater Boston Metropolitan Area extends to about 30% of the total area of the state and has a population of 4,411,835. That’s 68.53% of the total population of Massachusetts, meaning 2 out of every 3 people in Massachusetts are “from Boston” in the larger sense. If you fold in some of the satellite cities that are also considered part of the total statistical area such as Manchester NH, Providence RI and Worcester MA, the overall population is 7,427,336, or 115% of the population of Massachusetts.
That’s a lot of Massholes.
Related Posts: