Tag omega-3

You Can’t Kill A Dead Man

Screw Obama’a birth certificate…you want to talk about conspiracies, just look at how the Illuminati, the Tri-Lateral Commission and the Freemasons have figured out a nearly unbeatable way to kill me:

Sugar Is Toxic — not just bad for you, or “really, you ought to cut back a little”, it’s out-and-out POISON. And this isn’t some half-assed journalist’s misinterpretation of a sketchy study published in a less-than-respected journal, it’s right from the mouth of the endocrinologist doing the research.

Sitting is Lethal — again, not the tarted-up pseudo-scientific reporting from, say, New Scientist or The Weekly World News, and not the least bit equivocating in its conclusion. Sitting down will kill you, even if you are somebody who exercises regularly. The answer, according to the lead researcher: treadmill desks. No, seriously. As if corporate slavery weren’t already degrading enough.

Omega-3 Fish Oil causes Cancer — yes, it sounds like yet another scaremongering piece from the Daily Mail, but researchers really found that while omega-3 fatty acids were indeed good for your heart, they are also associated with an increased risk for a more aggressive type of prostate cancer, the kind that can actually kill you rather than the slow-growing sort that most men with prostate cancer have. And apparently it’s worse if you eat oily fish like salmon than if you take fish oil supplements.

I suppose there is some comfort to be had in the knowledge that none of us gets out alive, and that everybody dies of something in the end, but I’m beginning to think that they’re gunning for me on purpose. The joke is on them, though, because I died years ago and am just a hell-ghost restlessly wandering the earth. So there.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

I’ll Take Menhaden, The Bronx And Staten Island, Too

For a couple of years now I have been a daily consumer of various omega fatty acid supplements; not just the usual omega-3, which usually comes in the form of fish oil, but omega-6 and omega-9 as well, which come from flaxseed oil and borage oil. The whole range of the omega fatty acids have a variety of health benefits, though most people are probably just aware of the omega-3 effects on cardiac health. I originally started taking the fish oil for that purpose, but someone recommended adding the flax and borage, and I do believe that the combination of the three has been beneficial for me overall — a couple of chronic problems I’d had for years simply went away after taking the fish-flax-borage combo for a while.

However, I have to admit to being completely ignorant of the issues regarding the production of fish oil products. This NYT article from December is a guest op-ed from Paul Greenberg, a writer who has a book coming out later this year about fish and the fishing industries. in the article, he explains that most fish oil comes from a species of fish called menhaden (also known as the alewife). Menhaden are a critical link in the Atlantic ecosystem, because they the link in the food chain between plankton and large fish: the menhaden eat plankton, but practically every other fish in the sea eats menhaden. While menhaden have always been useful in industrial fisheries as the source of fish meal, it has been the boom in consumption of fish oil that has resulted in dangerous overfishing of the species. Greenberg points out that one company is responsible for 90% of the menhaden catch in the U.S., and their overfishing has resulted in their operations being banned up and down the East Coast except in two states. While the menhaden population is believed to be large and stable and not in immediate peril, Greenberg correctly argues that the time to lock in some protections against widespread overfishing is NOW, before the loss of an adequate supply of the fish causes problems not just for humans but for the entire ecosystem of the Atlantic ocean.

This TIME.com article picks up on the concerns Greenberg expresses but also mentions a possible alternative to menhaden-based fish oil supplements: algae oil. All that omega-3 fatty acid in the menhaden comes from the algae that they eat, and apparently it’s possible to get the omega-3 directly from processing the algae without involving the fish at all. And algae can be grown in processing vats rather than relying on harvesting from the sea. It’s possible to buy algae oil supplements now: this particular product came up with just a little Googling, and it looks like you might want to use “vegan” as a search term. The next time I run out of fish oil capsules, I think I will be giving it a try myself.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

I Wanna Be Medicated

Since my heart surgery three and a half years ago (!), my bedside table looks like a Walgreen’s. I take two medications for my blood pressure, two for diabetes, one for cholesterol, an anti-depressant, aspirin, and a thrice-daily fish oil supplement. At the moment, I am also taking ibuprofen three times a day because that little snowstorm the other day caused me to injure something in my left leg while I was snowblowing. So altogether that’s 10 pills this morning, 5 at lunchtime, and 9 more at bedtime.

Other than that, I feel great!

I started taking the fish oil supplements a few months ago on the recommendation from the nurse practitioner who prescribes my anti-depressant. According to the research she’s read, she says the three Omega fatty acids (Omega-3, -6, and -9) have therapeutic value for everything from hypertension to depression to metabolism. Considering that I needed help with all of that, it seemed worth a try. She said it would take about six months of taking supplements to see any results, but I have definitely lost a few pounds since I started (it’s been about five months for me now). I just came across this article in Discover last week that says studies of people taking fish oil supplements do show benefits in controlling diabetes as well. Another recent popular dietary supplement for glucose control, cinnamon, may not be as effective as originally thought. That’s okay with me, because I don’t particularly like cinnamon and don’t really want to add yet another pill to my daily regimen (you can take it as a pill or by adding ground cinnamon to food).

The cholesterol med I take is the near-ubiquitous Lipitor, and, as it happens, this week’s cover story at BusinessWeek magazine is about this particular “wonder drug”. I’m using scare quotes there because the thrust of the article is that there is a growing body of research that says statin drugs are not very effective. Oh, they lower your LDL cholestrol, but studies are showing that reduced LDL cholesterol is not particularly effective at reducing the risk of heart attacks, which is the primary motivation for prescribing the medication. In fact, there was news just last week about a new study of the statin drug Zetia (and an offshoot drug, Vytorin) that shows that it doesn’t produce any medical benefit at all.

The BW story is especially telling because it reveals a dirty little secret that Pfizer, the maker of Lipitor, doesn’t want you to be aware of — a statistic called “NNT” (Number Needed to Treat). In clinical studies, Lipitor has an NNT of 100, which is to say that 100 patients need to take the drug to see 1 patient have a positive result. By comparison, the article says, the antibiotic used to treat stomach ulcers has an NNT of 1.1; give the drug to 11 patients and 10 of them will get better. One doctor quoted in the article says that any NNT above 50 is “worse than a lottery ticket”.

That’s quite a reversal given the very positive news that has been released about statin drugs in the last couple of years. In the U.K., for example, doctors recommend that ALL diabetics take statins to address cardiac risks. And in the last year or two, recommendations have been made in this country to give statin drugs proactively to EVERYONE over the age of 35, whether they have high cholesterol or not.

The BW article openly wonders if Pfizer and the other Big Pharmas have overstated the research to serve their marketing aims. Pfizer generated almost $3 billion in revenue from Lipitor in one quarter last year, and the drug accounts for 19% of Pfizer’s total revenue. Here’s a telling pull quote:

“What the shrewd marketing people at Pfizer and the other companies did was spin it to make everyone with high cholesterol think they really need to reduce it,” says Dr. Bryan A. Liang, director of the Institute of Health Law Studies at the California Western School of Law and co-director of the San Diego Center for Patient Safety. “It was pseudo-science, never telling you the bottom-line truth, [which is] that the drugs don’t help unless you have pre-existing cardiovascular disease.”

Remember what I said the other day? Capitalism destroys EVERYTHING in the name of profit. BW says here’s a clear case of a drug that was only useful to a small group of patients (people who already had cardiovascular disease) and created demand for the drug among people it would not directly benefit (anyone with high cholesterol) to boost sales, even though there are serious side effects that can stem from taking statins. Of those 100 people in the “NNT” number, 99 of them are putting themselves at an increased risk of liver problems and other physical damage for NO CLINICAL VALUE, just Pfizer’s profit.

As someone who’s already had quadruple bypass surgery, I’m not likely to stop taking Lipitor. I AM that 1 person in 100. You probably are not and should read the BusinessWeek article and consider talking to your physician about it.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site