Tag Pakistan

We Have Always Been At War With Eurasia

So apparently we’re at war with Pakistan.

Today the Pakistan Army announced that it has given orders to all its troops to open fire on American military personnel who have been staging unauthorized raids into Pakistani territory for months (if not years).

Considering that we just barely finished installing our own meat puppet as the new President, that ought to give you some indication of just how much daily leadership control of the country the army still has there. It also demonstrates just how tightly we had the vise on Musharraf’s nuts to get him to go along with our demands and generally overlook the American military raids in the countryside for the last four or five years. With Mushy out of office, we’ve apparently lost our throttle over the rest of the military leadership, and our ability to install a “sympathetic” figurehead doesn’t amount to anything.

Since it doesn’t look like the Bush Administration is going to get its wish to start a war with Iran (which has also been fending off these border strikes for a couple of years), it must be making all the little neocons clap paws with glee to extend their Eternal War somewhere. Tom Englehardt, who blogs for The Nation, sets up some background information for you and offers an excerpt from Pakistani journalist Tariq Ali’s new book The Duel: Pakistan on the Flight Path of American Power. If the assertions here are valid, we aren’t going to NEED a war with Iran, because we’ll have our hands full fucking up Pakistan (which, BTW, actually DOES have nuclear weapons and may be willing to use them).

And before the Democrats get too smug here, keep in mind that Barack Obama supports the raids into Pakistan as part of his “plan” to “fight al Quaeda”, just as he continues to support the war in Afghanistan. In other words, don’t expect either candidate to bring about any CHANGE as far as the war-mongering goes, regardless of which one wins. We are only getting started, it seems.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Exporting American-Style Democracy, I See

Okay…never held political office, irresponsible playboy married into wealth, accused of corruption but no one could produce the smoking gun, and backed by the Bush Administration…why it must be the new President of Pakistan!

Proving that even after half a century of putting guys like Saddam Hussein into power, only to regret the decision a few years later, the U.S. has thrown its complete support behind the husband of assassinated Pakistani political leader Benazir Bhutto, Asif Ali Zardari. Though it’s been pretty damn hard to find out what’s been going on in the Real World all summer between Michael Phelps, Sarah Palin and hurricane season, you may have briefly heard that Our Sainted Ally in the Global War On Terror, Pervez Musharraf was pressured into resigning his office a couple of weeks ago and that there was much debate about whether to impeach him if he didn’t step down. It’s still believed that Mushy was behind the killing of Bhutto last year, and that he is playing fast and loose with the Americans and the Taliban, all while squashing constitutional rule in Pakistan. You know, basic tenets of democracy as defined by the Bush Administration.

Well now they’ve got themselves quite a winner with Zardari. He’s known as “Mr. Ten Percent” in Islamabad for insisting on skimming every deal he touches and using the money to build and maintain his palatial residences in England. Much of the criticism levelled at Benzair Bhutto came from simply being married to this scumbag and personally benefitting from his corrupt ways. This article at The Atlantic by Robert D. Kaplan lays out ther story of Asif Ali Zardari, and if the guy weren’t already setting up shop in the Presidential Palace in Pakistan, he would have made a GREAT substitute for Sarah Palin on the Republican ticket.

I have no doubt that if McCain wins, we’ll be up to our necks with this guy for a long time. If Obama wins…well, time will tell, but I’d say it’s a 50-50 proposition that we’ll still be supporting him in 2009. We just never seem to learn from our foreign policy mistakes.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Must-Read Links

Link-dump in progess! Here are a bunch of things I’ve seen posted around the web over the last week or so that don’t really tie together in any particular way but are too worthwhile to miss. Take notes, you will be quizzed on this material later.

1. Former Dateline reporter John Hockenberry has left NBC and joined the MIT Media Lab as a professor. He has written this article for MIT’s Technology Review about his disillusionment with the content biases in the major news operations. Every place I’ve seen it linked, it has been described as “scathing”, but it also needs to be described as “disheartening” and, sadly, as “unsurprising”.

2. Science fiction writer and all-around genius guy Bruce Sterling gave his annual “State Of The World” Q&A on the community site “The Well” this week. Just the introductory post by forum moderator Jon Lebkowsky would be worth reading on its own for its summation of the “state of the world”, but Sterling has a lot to say about terrorism, the collapse of nation-states, the impending ecological holocaust, and a couple of other interesting tangents. The dialogue is not over — people are still posting questions and he is still responding — but what’s been posted already is excellent reading.

3. This just about made me blow a gasket yesterday: a judge in New Jersey has ordered an atheist couple to relinquish custody of their adopted daughter because they do not believe in God. His reasoning is that they are depriving the baby from “…the inestimable privilege of worshiping Almighty God in a manner agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience.” The couple and the ACLU have appealed the decision to the New Jersey Supreme Court. Very honestly, I am chilled to the bone by the title of the article — “Can Atheists Be Parents?” — let alone the actual court ruling. Has the Christian Right’s goal of turning this country into a theocratic authoritarian state succeeded to the extent that I need to fear that my child might be taken from me by an overzealous judge because my personal beliefs do not match someone’s prescribed belief in God?

4. Shamed by the news reports of the video of Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, the Pakistan government has backed off their earlier story about the cause of her death, but now there is the report that Bhutto had an appointment later that same day with Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman Patrick Kennedy where she planned to deliver to them a copy of a report showing that the Musharraf government has been funneling American aid intended for “fighting terrorism” into efforts to rig the now-postponed January 8 election. In other words, she may have been about to give the American politicians the very smoking gun that killed her.

5. I think we’ve pretty clearly established the degree to which TSA airport security measures are nothing more than “security theater”, but just in case you still had any doubts, they should be wiped away once and for all by this blog post by Patrick Smith in last week’s NYT “Jetlagged”. Smith is a former airline pilot who also writes the “Ask The Pilot” column at Salon, and has plenty of first-hand experience with the “follies” of airport security.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

She Bumped Her Head And Couldn’t Get Up In The Morning

On the off-chance that you haven’t been watching much news over the long weekend…

The “official” cause of Benazir Bhutto’s death was announced by the Pakistan government on Friday as being due to bumping her head on the door handle of the SUV she was riding in after “someone from al-Quaeda” detonated a bomb.

So, I guess this video of someone firing four shots at point-blank range directly at her head is just a red herring, eh?

And if anyone really believes the “al Quaeda did it” story, I’d suggest they catch the first plane to Baghdad and start looking for all those Weapons of Mass Destruction, because both of those stories come from the same Mother Goose. Once again, the American penchant for backing The Wrong Guy is biting them squarely in the ass.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Benazir Bhutto

Bhutto's Last Moments

The photo above was taken just moments before Benazir Bhutto was assassinated today in Pakistan. Personally, I am stunned to think that she would expose herself as a target that way, but I suspect that she understood the risk. Surely no one can be surprised by this turn of events.

I’ve been trying to follow a variety of discussions around the Internet about the incident. So far this MetaFilter thread is pretty good if you ignore the usual nonsense going on. In that thread a couple of people have linked to this recent London Review of Books article by Tariq Ali which offers quite a bit of background on the Bhutto family and their role in Pakistani politics for the last 30 years or so.

It doesn’t take much intelligence to realize that the assassination is the work of the ISI (the Pakistan secret police) either with the direct approval or knowledge of Pervez Musharraf. The other major political figure in Pakistani presidential politics, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has already publicly accused Musharraf, as have some of Bhutto’s supporters in her party. Musharraf has taken quite a gamble that the army can outlast the rioters and that the situation won’t devolve into outright insurrection. He probably doesn’t have to worry too much, since we just gave him $300 million in aid, $50 million of which was specifically for military use.

Ironically, Bhutto had gone back to Pakistan at the behest of the U.S., which wanted to use her as a bit of political leverage against Musharraf. She might yet be useful as a martyr, but Musharraf has to most to gain from this situation by consolidating his own power a bit more, making him that much harder for the Americans to push around.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Pearls Of Wisdom

Pervez Musharraf Chimpy McFlightsuit


“You can’t be the president and the head of the military at the same time.”
– George W. Bush

Well, I guess he would know.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Really? REALLY????

52%

The latest Zogby Poll released last week reports that 52% of the American public supports going to war with Iran.

No, really.

I’m sorry…hasn’t ANYONE been paying attention for the LAST FOUR YEARS? Is the average American so fucking stupid that they will believe the exact same lies that they were told the last time, even after every single thing that was said has been proven to be false OVER AND OVER AGAIN? I am so flabbergasted at this that I can’t even work up a decent rant. It’s unimaginable to me. When I read that story last week, my jaw just about dropped three feet.

Lincoln said “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.” I guess he was right.

The poll goes on to say that even more people believe that an American attack on Iran will happen before George bush leaves office. This is a different opinion than thinking that staging such an attack is a good idea. I do happen to think we will probably attack Iran just in time for next year’s elections, but you’d better believe that I do not think it is even remotely a good idea.

Over the weekend, Pervez Musharraf usurped whatever last fragments of democracy were to be found in Pakistan, sounding frighteningly like George Bush as he talked about “activist judges” and fighting the “war on terror” as he suspended the Pakistani constitution and arrested their Supreme Court. Pakistan even already has a nuclear arsenal, and they’ve been spending all the money we’ve been throwing at them to get ready to go to war with India, even as they support the Taliban AND let Osama Bin Laden hide in their country. And we are willing to go to war with a country that has half the military spending of any other country in the region because there’s a “threat” they might make a nuclear weapon?

I understand that there’s a hardcore 25-30% of people who would support Bush if he ate babies on live television, but just what the fuck has to happen to the 30% of people in this country who are stupid enough to go along with this? AGAIN?!?!?

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site