Tag propaganda

Recommended Reading

We’ve got a holiday weekend coming up here in the U.S., so here are some longer articles I’ve read recently that might give you something to peruse if you get bored with raking leaves or watching football.

This anonymous post at N+1 is a first-hand account of an expat working for the Chinese propaganda ministry during the 2008 Beijing Olympics. The author spent those two weeks dutifully transcribing every official announcement into English and posting it on the China Internet Information Center website, but in addition to mechanically publishing the usual official blahblahblah, the author found herself constantly under watch for any sign of anti-China sentiment and was expected to similarly scrutinize everything that was said by others. It’s an interesting glimpse into how carefully the Chinese government tried to control every single bit of media that came out of Beijing during the Olympics.

“The Lonely Crowd”, by David Riesman, Nathan Glazer and Reuel Denney is one of a series of sociological tomes that appeared in the 1950s and 1960s detailing the seismic changes in American society after World War II as people moved out to the suburbs and community life changed from shared experiences of tight-knit groups to greater and greater insularity and isolation. The 60th anniversary of the publication of the book received this retrospective in the Chronicle of Higher Education last month.

I also enjoyed this Wall St. Journal review by film critic Todd McCarthy of a new biography of the film director Cecil B. DeMille called “Empire of Dreams” (by Scott Eyman). The review begins with an interesting little anecdote about an encounter between DeMille and a young Ayn Rand, looking for her first writing job in Hollywood. McCarthy praises Eyman’s book for humanizing a figure who was regarded as imposing and imperial by his contemporaries, and whose directorial authoritarianism was the very foundation of our stereotype of the screaming movie director with the beret and megaphone. I love a book review that makes me want to read the book, and this did just that.

Former Army career officer, current BU history professor, and outspoke war critic Andrew Bacevich wrote this long piece for the Huffington Post back in July evaluating what he says is the failure of the Western model of war as a political tool, which he uses to criticize right-wing historian Francis Fukuyama, who notoriously declared that “history was over” after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. He also compares the seemingly-unending conflicts between Israel and its neighbors to the equally fruitless military adventurism of the United States in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bacevich turns his lens on himself a little in this second HuffPo article which ran at the end of August, explaining how his own experiences stationed in Berlin in the 1960s shifted his whole appreciation of the world and America’s foreign policy from one of unquestioning orthodoxy to skepticism and critical inquiry. Both articles are drawn from his latest book “Washington Rules: America’s Path To Permanent War”.

ADDENDUMhere’s another column by Bacevich at HuffPo today reminding us that today marks the 9th anniversary of the Afghan War, and wondering when/how it might ever end.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Mmmm…Chocolate-Covered Lard, From AMERICA!

Okay, stop panting over the idea of chocolate-covered lard for a second and pay attention.

Apparently, these advertising posters have been popping up all over subway stations in Russia. They appear to be promoting “American Lard” in both plain and chocolate-covered varieties. Sounds delicious so far, right? Well, maybe if you’re Russian, I guess. But in point of fact, according to this independent Russian news blog (mercifully written in fluent English by an American living in Moscow), it’s some cockamamie propaganda stunt by a leftist-nationalist political party called “A Just Russia” to convince average Russians that Americans have undue influence over political affairs…wait for it…in Ukraine. The posters are supposed to make Russians aware of how shitty American food is, which will make them hate Americans all the way around, and thus make them angry about American meddling in Ukrainian politics. Now, why Russians would care about Ukrainian politics is a whole ‘nother can of chocolate-covered lard, but I guess they might be interested on some level.

The posters are only Stage 1 in this propaganda war. Next, the party is planning to extend the campaign into the Ukrainian media (which seems an awful lot like meddling to me, just sayin’) and might even make actual cans of chocolate-covered lard to give away to unsuspecting Ukrainian voters.

But, I gotta tell ya, there’s a strong chance of backlash here, once those poor, hungry Ukrainian bastards taste the sweet, sweet goodness of pork fat enrobed in luscious dark chocolate. Few can resist its seductive allure, and from there it is a short step to deep fried pork rinds, and straight on to hardcore bacon addiction. Even Stalin loved his morning bacon, comrades.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Triumph Of The Willing

leniadolf.jpg

Via Arts & Letters Daily, here’s a link to a review of a new biography of German filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl in the L.A. Times by film critic Richard Schickel. He begins with a bang:

Leni Riefenstahl was a slut.

A statement which he quickly qualifies, but then goes on to expand. His meaning is more in the sense that Riefenstahl willingly let herself be used by Hitler for his propaganda as a means of making use of the opportunity herself to promote her career. Certainly, she was neither the first woman nor the last to operate along those lines, so I don’t think it’s any particular revelation on the part of the biographer.

Schickel does point out that the biographer, Steven Bach, has done a good job of digging up plenty of source material that pushes the argument over whether or not Riefenstahl was herself complicit in the evildoings of the Nazis a bit more to the “Ja, mein fuhrer” column. Riefenstahl spent most of her time after the war aggressively denying her association with the Nazis and trying to rehabilitate her image into that of a “pure artist” who was manipulated by politics. Schickel’s “slut” comment” summarizes Bach’s evidence.

Sounds like a fascinating read.

One thing that Schickel says in the review has me thinking:

…Riefenstahl, it’s not an exaggeration to say, created almost every significant visual image that we now retain of National Socialism in all its evil pomp.

Again, not at all a stretch of the truth. Her imagery codified the “Nazi aesthetic”, and film and art students alike study it in intricate detail. The Fascist and Soviet Realist art movements of the 1930s are very significant in art history, instantly iconic culturally, and politically powerful even today. The emotional appeal of those works resonates with people very strongly, which was the whole point — the successes of Hitler and Stalin both came from their ability to manipulate the emotions of their subjects.

So, flash forward with me to the last six years and the plethora of tacky, overwrought, melodramatic imagery that has come out of the American right-wing in response to 9/11 and the Iraq War. Slap a flag or an eagle, or an eagle superimposed over a flag, or put the World Trade Center in the background, and VOILA! instant “patriotic” art. But it’s all shit. Pure and utter dreck. There’s nothing deeper to the imagery than the superficial emotionality that shoves itself into your face.

Ultimately, I think, that has prevented the right from burrowing into our psyches any further than they already have. The over-the-top histrionics of it all become alienating to people, particularly those of us who are already put off by all the jingoist behavior. As with other elements of the right-wing agenda, embracing this ticky-tacky schlockfest labels you as someone not too discerning or bright. And, while that simply doesn’t stop everyone, eventually even the people who might find some initial appeal to it find themselves not wanting to be identified with it. Also, our general level of media sophistication now makes it harder for people to not become detached and cynical about overt propaganda.

Sinclair Lewis was 100% on the money when he said “When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross.” Luckily, they don’t seem to have a lot of top-notch graphic artists on board yet.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site