Tag remote controls

And For $29.95 A Month, Paul The Octopus Will Come To Your House And Operate The Remote

So, back in early September, Apple announced their revamp of Apple TV, and everybody was interested for about three minutes until they all realized that it didn’t matter if the little box was cool because the service still sucked.

Around the same time the first rumors about Apple TV (now iTV, of course), Google announced that they, too, would be putting together a similar sort of service package, but instead of making a box themselves, they would simply license out the Android-based software to the regular assortment of electronics manufacturers and let them figure it out. This worked pretty well with Android on smartphones, which has taken off quite strongly, while Google’s own Nexus One phone crashed and burned in the space of six months. So, sure, let someone else make the hardware.

Though there isn’t the same legion of frothing fanbois that Apple has at its beck and call, the initial response to the announcement generated a lot of hyperbolic optimism like this because Google has managed to hang on to a lot of positive feeling in the techie crowd, despite a whole slew of dud projects over the last year. However, the first actual “Google TV” product was unveiled this week by Sony, and you can almost hear the lead balloon hitting the floor. The remote control alone will kill this sucker deader than a doornail. This TechCrunch post captures the profound ambivalence from the technogeek crowd pretty well, because most gearheads look at a remote like that as a challenge to be mastered, but even they realize that this has no chance in hell with ordinary consumers.

Like other attempts to jam the Internet and television into the same appliance, this hits the same wall: people may like to watch TV on their computers, but they don’t seem to want to use their TV *as* their computer. In this case, the iTV actually ends up looking better than the Google TV, since it adheres more closely to the idea of being a service enabler for your TV, even if the service offering is kinda weak. Yes, the iTV will probably make some apps available to run on your TV, but Apple seems to realize that there is a gulf of perception between the iPad and iTV in terms of how people will use the device, despite being able to bring the exact same stuff to either device. If Sony’s first-guy-in-the-pool effort is emblematic of how Google TV will position itself, get ready for another entry into the Unloved Technology Hall Of Fame right next to WebTV and laserdiscs.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Best.Remote.Control.EVAR.

Simplest Remote

Yet another fine project from the folks at Instructables.com: a remote control simplified down to its most basic elements, featuring extra-large buttons. The person who made this came up with the idea because his elderly mother was having a hard time with her overly-complicated remote control, but quite honestly I think you could satisfy more than 90% of remote control users with this. Especially if it would control more than one device — he needs to work in a simple way of having the remote switch between devices (maybe a location sensor that can tell what you’re pointing at). (via boingboing)

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Overcompensating Much? – Part 1

100-Button Remote Control

I *HATE* most remote controls. They are completely non-intuitive, have no standard UI scheme from one to the next, and can be infuriating to try to use if you need to control more than one device with them. Even the TiVo remote, which my former cow-orkers at IDEO designed and is generally recognized as one of the best remotes ever, suffers from “find-the-right-button” issues.

This designer has come up with a unique answer to the problem (via) — a remote control with one button for every single channel (provided you only have 100 channels). It’s almost two feet long, so it does have the advantage of being really hard to lose.

He’s also designed some more conventional remotes, which have the usual issues incorporated into their otherwise swoopy designs.

I think a far better idea for remote controls is to have them function like the Wiimote: just a few buttons for selecting items and a navigable mouse cursor on the screen to select choices from menus. It would also help if electronics makers wouldn’t try to cram too many features into their devices.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Birthday Preview

remotewrangler.jpg

Well, now I know what I am going to buy my wife for her birthday. It’s this: a velco-covered piece of headgear called the Remote Wrangler that lets you put all of your remote controls in one convenient spot — your head!

I especially like the “sports” model that looks like an athletic supporter. That’s just the thing for my wife, the self-appointed Queen of the Remotes in our bedroom. Who says there aren’t any romantic gifts anymore?

(via Engadget)

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site