Tag revolution

“This Is What Revolution Looks Like”

Now come the iconic images that will define the moment when Occupy Wall Street transformed from simple and somewhat uncertain protest into a serious opposition of the crimes and political usurpation of democracy by corporations and banks. And, as I am sure surprises no one at all, those images are of police brutality against peaceful demonstrators:

I, for one, have no doubt that some of these images will become as ingrained in our collective imagination as the Kent State shooting or the pictures of fire hoses unleashed on civil rights marchers in Alabama, and to much the same end: the demonstration of the failure of the authorities to respond appropriately to the demand for overdue justice and change and the desperate resort to violence and brutality.

Journalist Chris Hedges, who has become one of several “go-to” voices throughout the last couple of months for understanding the motivations and broader context of the Occupation, has written what I think is probably the closest thing to a manifesto to come out of the situation to date: “This Is What Revolution Looks Like” The very first paragraph reads like a call to arms:

Welcome to the revolution. Our elites have exposed their hand. They have nothing to offer. They can destroy but they cannot build. They can repress but they cannot lead. They can steal but they cannot share. They can talk but they cannot speak. They are as dead and useless to us as the water-soaked books, tents, sleeping bags, suitcases, food boxes and clothes that were tossed by sanitation workers Tuesday morning into garbage trucks in New York City. They have no ideas, no plans and no vision for the future.

Consider some of the other events of the past week in the context of what is occurring in New York, Oakland, and Portland: the leaders of Greece and Italy have both been replaced by Goldman Sachs “technocrats” to insure that those countries fulfill their obligations to the banks first, regardless of the economic hardships that they will impose on the public. Meanwhile, Tahrir Square in Cairo once again has turned into a battleground between the people and the military junta that took advantage of that revolution to seize power. You have to be stupid or willfully ignorant at this point not to see that this country is approaching a similar crossroads: the failure of our political system has been turned into a running joke by the endless series of “debates” among the hapless, impotent, and possibly deranged Republican presidential candidates, while the Congressional “supercommittee” prepares to walk away from any sort of serious negotiation. We don’t have to worry about whether or not a Goldman Sachs man is going to take over, because the last two Secretaries of the Treasury have been Goldman Sachs executives, and Goldman Sachs bankrolls Barack Obama. So the “beginning of the beginning” is fully upon us, and if you think the authorities will draw the line with some pepper spray and a little extra muscle in the squabble, you’re as delusional as those Republicans.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Nina Sings The Beatles

I’m pretty sure I saw this at Dangerous Minds, since they have the coolest music clips. It’s the legendary Nina Simone singing her version of The Beatles’ “Revolution” at the 1969 Harlem Cultural Festival (sometimes called “the Black Woodstock”). So much has changed and yet so little has changed since then. Enjoy.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Bring Lawyers, Guns and Money

revolutionary

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — The Declaration of Independence

If it isn’t clear to people by now that when Barack Obama said “Change you can believe in”, he really meant nothing of the kind. He meant “we’ll just keep on doing it the way we always have”, and most Democrats have been okay with this because the ones in power benefit from having it be their turn and the ones who aren’t powerful seem to be satisfied that he’s not George Bush and that’s all they really cared about in the first place. Which is really, really, really disgusting, when you think about it.

So what can you do? Well, the deck is so stacked against any attempt to bring change to the rotten two-party system that the consensus seems to be that the only way to effect any change is to “nut up” (as that ad for the new Woody Harrelson movie says), and settle in for the long haul of trying to bring genuine change to the Democrats, who are the lesser of the two evils. The Republican Party was transformed through the slow process of seeding people at the bottom 25-30 years ago and now those wackjobs and wingnuts have successfully turned that party into a very scary political entity indeed. This long, but well-written, post at The Seminal (which has been folded into the political site Fire Dog Lake) by Bill Egnor outlines exactly wht a long and arduous task it will be. If you don’t have a quarter-century to devote to it, it’s going to seem insurmountable.

And maybe it is insurmountable. Maybe our political system is so ossified and thoroughly corrupt that it can’t be changed through even the most diligent of grass roots activism. Maybe it’s time to “nut up” and shoot it out. It’s my distinct impression that there are quite a few people on the right preparing for this very solution. It’s becoming my opinion that the left should begin thinking the same way. If you want me to believe in “change”, then you’d better be intended to actually change something.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site