Tag right-wing wackos

The “S” Word

Every time some right-wing nutjob starts spouting off about Barack Obama being a socialist, you can be sure that they have no fucking clue about either socialism OR Obama. Which is what makes this recent Huffington Post article by conservative law scholar Jedediah Purdy embracing America’s “socialist” tradition worth reading. Purdy backs off from the absurd rhetoric of the contemporary right, which asserts that anything that isn’t pure laissez faire free market pro-corporatist ideology must be the work of Satan, and remembers that ideas about reforming economic inequality, regulating unbridled capitalism, and sharing the benefits of democratic society were once upon a time as cherished by conservatives as they were liberals. Considering that the gaggle of morons duking it out this week in Iowa and New Hampshire seem only interested in out-shrieking one another about who can destroy America the fastest, it is reassuring to learn that there are some voices on the other side who aren’t quite so ready to jump off the cliff with them.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Stay Classy, Maine Tea Party

For a short time the other day, the official homepage of the Maine Tea Party declared Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik their “Man Of The Year”.

Nice.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Corrections


Typewriters going extinctnot yet


Large Hadron Collider scientists finding the “God Particle”not so much


iPhone tracks your every single movement and rats you out to the Fedssort of, but not really, and Steverino swears they’ve got a patch for that


Barack Obama releases birth certificate, proving he was born in Hawaiistill a no-good sekrit Muslin nigra according to almost 25% of the entire population of the U.S.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Imagine A Boot Stomping On A Human Face FOREVER

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face — forever.” — George Orwell

So I guess the Tea Party really IS the future of America.

Thanks to the current flood of posts and arguments about the Tea Party over at MetaFilter, last week I learned about a political movement in France in the 1950s and 1960s called Poujadisme. The movement is named after the man who created it, Pierre Poujade, and was a right-wing countermovement that sought to undo many post-war economic reforms in France. A lot of the rhetoric and ideology behind Poujade’s party, the UDCA (Union de Defense Commercants et Artisans), sounds very much like the complaints of the Tea Party, as this PoliticsUSA article explains. Robert Zaresky, a professor of French history, also explains the rise of the Poujadistes in this NYT op-ed from February.

In the face of incidents like the one in Kentucky this week and the illegal handcuffing and intimidation of a journalist at a Joe Miller campaign event in Alaska, there is the inevitable comparison being made between the Tea Party and the rise of the Nazis in Germany. I have even made this observation myself here, and I continue to believe that the parallels exist. However, I also now see that perhaps the parallel to the rise of the Nazis is merely one possible path, and the parallel to the Poujadistes another. The fulcrum that tips the balance one way or another is likely to be not the short-term outcome of next week’s election, but the longer-term outcome of what actually happens in government once the Tea Party candidates are installed in office. In the case of France and the Poujadistes, the advent of DeGaulle as president co-opted much of the nationalist and center-right elements back into mainstream politics, even as such individuals as Jean-Marie LePen were able to use the UDCA to launch their own more extreme parties. In the case of Germany, the much more radicalized political environment was poorly manipulated by the powers-that-be and in short order the Nazis had completely usurped them.

Even though I’m more than a little disquieted by the willingness of the current campaigns to flirt with violence, I am a bit relieved to learn that there is a way in which a group as unfocused as the Tea Party can be defanged a bit, even if it means having to put up with a much more explicitly right-wing government to mollify them. But I also remain convinced that the Tea Party harkens the specter of something far more sinister that could become an unstoppable force if they ever coalesce around a credible charismatic leader, which, luckily, they still have not done.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

There’s Crazy And Then There’s Teabagger Crazy

You have to see this video to believe it. It’s an actual Republican candidate for Congress in Delaware, the same state that recently chose über-wacko and Sara Palin-wannabe Christine O’Donnell to be their Republican candidate for Senate, telling a group of supporters that they should ask their liberal friends “why they are Nazis” because it was Adolf Hitler, not Thomas Jefferson, who coined the terms “separation of church and state”.

Can I just ask what the FUCK are people smoking in Delaware?

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Tea For Two

Required reading:

This Vanity Fair profile of Sarah Palin by Michael Joseph Gross hit the web yesterday. Let’s hope it does for her career what the VF profile of General Stanley McChrystal did for his.

Jane Mayer’s profile of the Kochs, David and Charles, in The New Yorker a couple of weeks ago also helps to put a little sunlight on the monsters behind the Tea Party. If nothing else, it shows that Rupert Murdoch isn’t the only evil supervillian trying to take over the world. Now we just need a real-life James Bond to take these motherfuckers out.

Matt Taibbi is up to his usual snuff with a Rolling Stone post about the recent primary elections and the influence the Tea Party did and did not have on the outcome, and the insidious race-baiting of Murdoch’s FOX News.

Christopher Hitchens proves that he isn’t dead yet by giving the ol’ one-two to the Beckapalooza of last weekend. As infuriating as he is, we are going to sorely miss Hitch when he is gone. (If you’ve got the time, I also recommend this long video featuring interviews with teabaggers at the Beckapalooza for an up-close-and-personal look at the terminally stupid)

The always-funny “stupid customer” website Not Always Right.com had a little precautionary tale about what happens when teabaggers show up to vote.

And here’s a little history lesson about the origins of the Tea Party and its ilk:

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Your Daily Infographics

First a small bit of context for the first one: I was simply gobsmacked by this Huffington Post story (pointed out by Jack Cluth) that twigged out something that went unreported in the “20% of Americans think Obama is a Muslim” story from last week: 52% of Republicans believe that Osama “probably or definitely” wants to impose Islamic Sharia law on the United States. I will let you ponder the rank stupidity of that while you look at this Venn diagram (via Scott Underwood)


(original source)

Graphic #2 is, as I say, only marginally related, as it is more specifically about the Iraq War, but considering the lame bit of political theater from Obama last night, it’s worth recalling:

Make of these data points what you will, my friends.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Maine-iacs, Indeed

Congratulations to the Maine Republican Party on completing the transition from Reality to Nutjobistan this week as the Teabaggers took full control of their party convention and imposed their bizarre list of demands onto the party’s official platform for the 2010 elections.

Among their demands:

  • making atheism illegal
  • an investigation of “collusion between government and industry in the global warming myth”
  • reject the UN Treaty on Rights of The Child, the Law Of The Sea Treaty, and, while you’re at it, just abolish the whole damn UN
  • “Discard political correctness, make public the declaration of war (Jihad), made against the US on 23 Feb 1998, and fight the war against the United States by radical Islam to win.”
  • “Repeal and prohibit any participation in efforts to create a one world government.”
  • “Return to the principles of Austrian Economics”

And the really scary thing: these people are probably going to win whatever they are running for in November. All that inbreeding and Allen’s Coffee Brandy have finally taken their toll.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Unclear On The Concept, Teabagger Edition

Sarah Palin and the Teabaggers were in town yesterday. According to most of the local media, the total crowd was about 5000-6000 people, about only half of which were actual teabaggers and the rest of whom were counter-protesters. This local blogger who posts at True/Slant says that the whole event was pretty lackluster, which is pretty much corroborated by this live-blog of the event. As is usually the case with these rallies, the huffing and puffing of FOX News and other rightie media outlets came nowhere near the reality on the ground.

This just in from the Department of the Screamingly Obvious: The New York Times did a little demographic polling of teabaggers and found that most of them are wealthy, well-educated, middle-aged white Republican men. Whodathunkit?!?!? This group’s agenda boils down to two issues: they don’t like paying taxes and they don’t like that secret-Muslim nigger socialist in the White House. Did anyone think this would play big with anyone other than angry rich racist geezers? The only thing that strikes me at all is the part about them being well-educated — just look at the signs. I guess it does prove how crappy education is in this country that even the “well-educated” can’t spell, but it doesn’t make me have a lot of confidence in the overall brainpower of these people.

Problem is, as a whole, the general public isn’t any more clued-in than these idiots. To wit:

You might have encountered this infographic last week. It’s from a poll conducted by The Economist and YouGov.com. Among other things, they asked people what they thought the government should reduce spending on as a way to reduce the budget deficit, and the Number One Answer was “foreign aid”. But as the graph below shows you, foreign aid makes up a teeny-tiny part of government spending:


(the blue bar shows the percentage of people who said “reduce this”, the red bar shows the percentage that item accounts for in the federal budget. link to original post).

Nobody wants Medicare or Social Security or veteran’s benefits cut, not even the Teabaggers. That kind of “socialism” is just fine and dandy with the “Don’t Tread On Me” crowd. So why is ANYONE paying attention to the Teabaggers at this point? Oh, that’s right…it’s because this greedy, racist, right-wing white guy has devoted an entire news organization to making sure that’s all they talk about.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Maybe We Don’t Need Them After All

Earlier in the week, there was a blog post by a guy who calls himself American Dad posting at Talking Points Memo called “An Open Letter To Conservatives”. In it, he offers a vast laundry list of all the appalling behavior, thuggish tactics, and outright terrorist acts that have been committed by elected Republican officials, right-wing “political action” groups, straight-up right-wing wackos, and that gaggle of morons known as “The Tea Party”. It’s a pretty damning list of lies, hypocrisies, petulant behavior, and serious acts of violence, and yet he says “we need you” to them, arguing that somewhere, somehow there is something beneficial about trying to reason with these people and bring them back into the fold of normal, civil, rational political debate.

And that sounds all nice and fuzzy and conciliatory and such, but I am here to tell you that it’s totally wrong-headed. We don’t need any of that bullshit, and to pretend that just sitting down over a cup of coffee with these people will turn them back into rational, thoughtful people who just differ a little bit in opinion is not only foolish, it is quite likely dangerous.

Since the passage of the health care legislation Sunday night, right-wing groups have begun shattering windows, tried to blow up the house of a Democratic member of Congress (except they got the wrong house and almost killed the guy’s brother and his family), and have instigated so many death threats against members of Congress that no fewer than 10 of them have had to be given round-the-clock police protection. Just a couple of weeks ago I wrote about the looming threat of widespread right-wing violence and it’s beginning to look like the passage of the health care bill was exactly the match needed to set off their tinder.

So what can anyone expect to gain from trying to reason with people who have concluded that the best course of action is to threaten, intimidate, and kill? That’s not “meaningful political dialogue”, it’s terrorism plain and simple. “Conservatism” is a meaningless term in the present context, because there’s nothing conservative about the actions and agendas of these groups. Mollycoddling them with the notion that they might have something positive to offer is like hand-feeding steak to a starving grizzly bear.

The time has come to take a tougher stance in response to these people and instead of offering them a seat at the table, pushing them back under the rock they crawled out from.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site