The Scots, the Northern Irish, the Welsh, even the Cornish have all expressed a desire to have more autonomy from the United Kingdom in recent years. The announcement came this week that the Scottish referendum is now scheduled for the fall of 2014, but the Christian Science Monitor says that the latest group to be feeling its oats a bit is the English themselves. Public opinion in England proper is beginning to show a bit of resentment towards the other nations, particularly Scotland, for the amount of money the national government spends to support them, and a bit of old-fashioned John Bull-ism.
Tag Scotland
Calling His MacBluff
Back in November I posted about the efforts to stage a referendum on independence for Scotland. Now, Prime Minister David Cameron is calling Scottish Premier Alex Salmond’s bluff by agreeing to a referendum…as long as it is held “sooner than later” and as long as it is a straight up-or-down vote on complete independence. This analysis by Guy Lodge in the British political magazine “Prospect” considers the risks both sides run by going ahead with the referendum. Lodge argues that Salmond has more to lose and that Cameron has triangulated the situation well, but the national government could find itself having less room to negotiate in any future devolution agreements.
The third option, called “devo max”, gives Scotland full financial responsibility, while retaining the national structure for most political/governmental institutions. This Guardian op-ed by Simon Jenkins states with little ambiguity why “devo max” is probably the best solution for both sides, and takes Cameron to task for not embracing what Jenkins sees as a pragmatic solution to devolution.
Related Posts:
Scotland Forever
Ever since the Scottish National Party became the majority in the Scottish Parliament several years ago, there’s been talk of holding a national referendum to vote on becoming fully independent from the United Kingdom, and this past May the government’s Secretary of State for Scotland said that the government would not block such a referendum, even though both the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrat Party that make up the current government officially oppose Scottish independence (Labour does too, for that matter). It was more a public admission that the national government could not stop the Scottish Parliament than any sign of support.
Polling suggests that independence is not a lock: not quite one-third of the population supports it, with just about as many supporting remaining within the U.K. if more autonomy were granted. This recent article from The Awl by British journalist Jennifer O’Mahony explains some of the issues that Scotland and the rest of the U.K. would face should they actually part ways. Not surprisingly, the biggest one is finances: the U.K. government spends more per capita on the people in Scotland than in England. The U.K. might like to save that money, while the new leaders in Edinburgh would have to find a way to generate the revenue needed to continue programs and services.
Oh, and yes, they do have oil. So don’t be surprised when OUR government decides that wearing a kilt is a sure sign of being a terrorist and that we will have to invade Scotland AT ONCE to preserve our freedom.
Related Posts:
Wha’ The Feck Did Ye Say, Ye Great Eejit?
HINT: All you need to know is to make sure every other word is “feck” or “cunt” and you’re golden. No points awarded if you sound anything like James Doohan from Star Trek or that “Think with your dipstick, Jimmy!” guy.
(Via MetaFilter)
Related Posts:
Why Scotty Always Took The Stairs
I got a laugh from this sketch of two Scotsmen trying to use a voice-activated elevator:
(via Singularity Hub)
Related Posts:
Breaking Up Is Hard To Do

I guess the Serbs didn’t take the news of Kosovo’s “supervised independence” all that well, eh?
The Venn diagram above is one that’s been going around the web recently. It purports to explain the overlapping and intersecting identifications of people and places in the United Kingdom — for example, how you can be a Scotsman and a Briton at the same time. When Americans call people “British” they generally mean “English”, but while all Englishmen are British, not all Britons are Englishmen. Get it? Devolution is a big deal in the United Kingdom these days, as we’ve discussed here before. This recent article in The Guardian by journalist Iain McWhirter goes so far as to assert that the dissolution of the U.K. back into its constituent parts is now “inevitable”. The success of the SNP in wresting away political authority from Westminster is serving as a model for similar actions in Wales and Northern Ireland, and McWhirter argues that perhaps the best that London can hope for is some sort of federal system.

In the 1990s, the Soviet Union fell apart without a lot of effort once the Communist Party lost control in Moscow. While Russia and Byelorussia eventually kissed and made up, the rest of the nations that re-asserted themselves as independent states have moved on. Some, most notably the Baltic trio of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, quickly re-aligned with the West. Others simply replaced the brutal Soviet government with their own brutal dictatorships, and even the “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine has not completely reformed that country’s government. The tiny country of Georgia was one of the first to shed the Soviet yoke, but they have struggled with Russia for years because Georgia controls access to valuable ports and oil. Now the Georgian government has to deal with a breakaway minority of its own — Abkhazia (via). Abkhazia borders on the Black Sea, which is why the Russian government has kept a hand in this particular conflict. As the linked article states, the Kosovo declaration puts Georgia and the EU in a tough spot with regard to recognizing Abkhazia.

You may or may not recall this from late last year: the Native American tribes that collective are known as the Lakota have declared their independence from the United States and renounced all U.S. claims to their territory, which covers portions of North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana. As with the situations in Kosovo and Abkhazia, the stakes of other nations recognizing the validity of this claim to nationhood are pretty high but have been so low-balled by the U.S. government as to be almost meaningless.
But the Lakota are not the only ones talking about declaring independence. There’s an active secession movement in Vermont. Vermont was briefly an independent republic prior to becoming a state, and so the secessionists would call their country the “Second Vermont Republic”. That article also mentions in passing some secessionist groups in the Pacific Northwest, Texas (big surprise), and even California. And those are the ones who AREN’T the loonie gun-toting wackjobs!
The, of course, there’s that whole Red State Vs. Blue State thing:

Related Posts:
Okay, But We Can Still Eat The Pasties, Right?
Cornwall is the westernmost region in the south of England, and even though it has been a part of England for at least a thousand years, the Cornish people were originally a distinct tribe, complete with their own language, who were eventually conquered by the Anglo-Saxons. Now, with the success of “devolution” for Scotland, there are Cornish groups like this one hoping to achieve similar autonomy for Cornwall. An attempt to form a Cornish Assembly in 2000 received popular support at the polls, but has not yet been recognized by the U.K. government.
It would be interesting to see the United States “devolve” along linguistic lines. Maybe a “Republic of Pop” versus “The Dominion of Soda”; I guess Boston would be something like “The Principality of Tonic”.
Related Posts:
If It’s Not Scots, It’s CRAP!

So it’s a tartan you’re after, is it? Are ye no’ Scots, then? Ah, well. Then perhaps you’re Irish? No, ye say?
Well then GO MAKE YER OWN FECKIN’ TARTAN YE GOBSHITE!








