Tag WiFi

Getting In Touch With My Feminine Side

Not only does this help me with my inner woman, it also helps me with my inner geek. This post at a crafters’ forum features a cross-stitch sampler anyone can make that includes a bit of modernity that actually can come in handy: displaying your home wireless network’s SSID and WEP encryption key. Now your houseguests who arrive with their laptops will feel right at home logging onto your network. This is actually useful enough that I would consider suggesting it to some of my LOL’s as a way to help them keep this information at hand. Just one carp, dearie: everybody should be using WPA2 instad of WEP for their encryption.

Tina Fey’s new book, Bossypants, is out and getting good reviews. Blogger Melody Godfred took a few minutes to transcribe part of the book, “A Mother’s Prayer For Her Child”, which speaks to the existential dread felt by mothers (and fathers) about their daughters’ futures:

May she play the Drums to the fiery rhythm of her Own Heart with the sinewy strength of her Own Arms, so she need Not Lie With Drummers.

While we’re talking books, Salon’s Laura Miller reviewed a new book by author Wendy McClure called “The Wilder Life: My Adventures in the Lost World of ‘Little House on the Prairie’”. McClure set out to “let her calico sunbonnet freak flag fly” by visiting some of the real-life places where Laura Ingalls Wilder and her family lived. As you know, we hold Laura close to our hearts in this home, so I can empathize with her fandom, even if I was not a sunbonnet-wearing little girl in the 1970s. The book sounds like fun for anyone who is a “Little House” aficionado.

This video of comedian Julia Sweeney telling the tale of finding herself unexpectedly having to explain sex to her eight-year-old daughter made the rounds online a couple of weeks ago. It’s longish (about 10 minutes), but sweet and funny and exactly as uncomfortable as one might expect:

This is a conversation that won’t have to happen this way for us, because Bridget and I have always been pretty straight with Charlotte about the anatomical elements of her own body. She’s known about her own uterus and eggs and stuff like that for a long time. She’s also had at least a vague idea of “sex” (in the sense of “this is how two people make a baby”) for several years, though without some of the embellishments. And a steady diet of tween TV has given her enough of the boyfriend-girlfriend story. Now that the three of us stand on the cliff’s edge of beginning puberty, there will be the need to expand the conversation a little, but it shouldn’t ever have to play out like Julia Sweeney and the frogs.

Even though I like to think of myself as being far less unwilling to engage with aspects of femininity than most of the men I know, the hard reality for me is that this next phase of Charlotte’s growing up involves a cleaving between us as father and daughter. I can sympathize but I don’t have any real insight or perspective into the details of becoming a woman. It is simply part of her life I cannot share. I very sincerely wish that the trust and openness we’ve always had about everything else will help to minimize the separation, but it will always be there. The Tina Fey poem wishes for “a rough patch between twelve and seventeen” for a daughter to find that path deliberately but slowly, instead of the torment of teenager-hood; I can’t even begin to guess at the depth of the angst that those years might deliver upon a girl child, I can only start trying to find a way to watch from a distance.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

I Fi, You Fi, We All Fi For WiFi

A couple of links worth reading:

A few years ago, many American cities and towns made a big deal about efforts to bring free municipal WiFi to their residents and visitors, but, like a lot of promises made by overzealous politicians, there hasn’t been nearly as much follow-through as one might have hoped. According to this website, there are now 84 municipalities and counties that offer hotspots or widespread WiFi (as of June 2010). This recent MIT Technology Review post says that it wasn’t so much a political problem that kiboshed municipal WiFi, even with the Great Recession and all; instead, it was a much bigger technical problem than even supporters initially believed, caused in large part by the limitations on WiFi signals imposed by the FCC when they authorized the technology.

Meanwhile, I’m sure anyone who has traveled with a laptop in the last several years has had this experience: you are in an airport/hotel lobby/conference center with your laptop, looking to score one of those aforementioned not-so-prevalent free WiFi hotspots so you can check your e-mail and maybe hit The Twitter. Your laptop looks around and finds a few secure networks, but staring at you in the list is something called “Free Public WiFi”. So, since people are totally incapable of resisting anything with the word “free” in it, you click…and nothing happens. This Lifehacker post explains that you are, in fact, being punked by your own laptop, and how, in some circumstances, you are potentially letting some unscrupulous individual connect directly to your computer (or at the very least, giving them a big fat invitation to do so).

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Planes, Trains And Automobiles

Even though the EU has given the green light to in-flight cell phone service, and Air France has been testing text-messaging from cell phones since last December, plans for in-flight cell phone service in the U.S. haven’t gone very far due to regulatory opposition from both the FAA and the FCC. Meanwhile, though, this week American Airlines began testing in-flight WiFi service on some transcontinental flights. AA says they won’t filter content, but that they will prevent users from using PC-based VoIP services like Skype. I suspect that the “no filtering” bit will last only as long as it takes for the first passenger to complain about the person next to them watching porn, but we’ll see. I, for one, truly hope they never allow in-flight cell phone service; imagine the six-hour trip from Boston to California with the entire cabin full of business travelers yakking away on their cellphones while watching porn AT THE SAME TIME! The only way I’d get on a plane is if the airline gave free sedatives to everyone so I could at least be unconscious.

Amtrak has always been able to make the claim of having cell-phone service, since trains pass right through the terrestrial cell network like every other land vehicle, so no big whoop there, but Amtrak started offering WiFi on some trains all the way back in 2004. Here’s a fairly technical interview with Amtrak’s head Network Architect about the challenges they faced in pulling together all the pieces they needed to make for a seamless online experience for train riders. This discussion forum thread offers some first-hand accounts of using WiFi on other rail services in Canada and the UK for comparison. Here in Eastern Massachusetts, the MBTA offers WiFi on the Framingham-Worcester commuter rail line, though word is that the service can be spotty due to some dead zones.

Scariest of all, though, is this week’s announcement by Chrysler that ALL of their 2009 models (yes the ones that will be in the dealer showrooms come September) will offer WiFi as an add-on for $500. Vehicles will have built-in wireless routers that will make the entire interior of the car a hotspot with a throughput of 600-800 kbps down (that’s a good deal slower than today’s typical home broadband, but faster than dialup by a significant amount), and will extend up to 50 feet beyond the vehicle. The routers will connect to Chrysler’s UConnect service, which is a combination of WiFi to the end device and cell service to the ISP and will cost $29/month with a one-time $35 activation fee. If you thought drivers yakking on their cell phones while driving was bad, you just wait until people start checking their e-mail while driving. Time to make sure your car insurance is paid up, kids.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

FREE As In Beer

I’ve posted a couple of times about the “Nintendo Fan Network” wireless system that Nintendo tested out last year at Safeco Field in Seattle and also a similar system being tested at DisneyWorld in Florida.

Today, Engadget reports that Safeco Field will offer the service for free this season. Previously, there was a $5.00 fee to use the service; given how much everything else costs at a professional sporting event, it’s pretty amazing that they’ve eliminated the charge instead of jacking it up to $15-20, but, as Chris Anderson wrote in Wired a couple of months ago, in the end anyone providing these kind of services will find themselves giving away the service in order to make money on the extras (the old “give away the razor, make the money on the blades” theory that has served Gillette so well for decades).

To wit: a few weeks ago none other than the mighty Starbucks itself said that they would stop charging for WiFi (sort of), after soaking people for $6 a whack for several years. The service has been spotted in the wild in at least one city, and will take them the rest of 2008 to roll out to every store. In cities like New York, which seem to have a Starbucks every 100 fet, this is as good as having municipal WiFi. I hope they hit the Boston stores soon, because Boston’s own municipal WiFi has more or less gone tits-up.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Food News Of The FUTURE!!!

Via Jo comes this post from The Kitchn.com about a new gadget on display at the recent International Home & Housewares Show. Cleverly named “KitchenSync”, it’s an ultra-thin web-enabled device that lets you access your favorite online recipes and also input your own recipes. The vertical orientation of the device is more like a traditional cookbook than a laptop, and the built-in WiFi means you aren’t tethered to one particular spot to use it. You can even get it dirty and then just wipe it clean! Personally, I would love to have a thing like this to use in the kitchen instead of a laptop. Sadly, it’s not a real product yet, it’s just a concept project from the industrial designer who was demoing it.

In the more immediate future, the crazy folks at Jones Soda are teaming up with the gigglemeisters at “I Can Has Cheezburger” to put together a contest where submitters can suggest names for a LOLCat-themed variety of soda.

No word as to what FLAVOR the soda might be, but these are the same people who have developed such classics as Brussel Sprout, Christmas Tree, and Turkey & Gravy, so be warned…

This article in yesterday’s Manchester Guardian takes a look at some of the areas where nanotechnology might have an impact on food production. To date, most of the interest has been in the use of nanoparticles to improve shelf-life and “intelligent” packaging, but many food processing companies are unwilling to discuss their nanotech initiatives due to the backlash against GM foods. Nevertheless, they are pursuing such diverse lines of research as using nanoparticles to hyper-target pesticides to delivering additional nutrients or even medications via “nanofoods”. Any use of nanotechnology in food production will come under intense regulatory scrutiny in Europe, but also quite a lot of public resistance in the U.S. as well as the E.U.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

HotSpot Or Not

The tech story of the day is unquestionably this InfoWorld story that quotes Ericsson’s Chief Marketing Officer Johan Bergendahl saying that WiFi hot spots are yesterday’s news and are about to be surpassed by mobile broadband.

As most of the tech press and blogs have been quick to point out, however, Ericsson just happens to be trying to promote their own particular flavor of mobile broadband as the new standard for cell phones and other wireless devices. So, you might need to consider anything their Chief Marketing Officer says as being a little bit biased.

At CNet News.com, Marguerite Reardon has a bit of a rebuttal for some of Bergendahl’s claims. Her argument is not that Bergendahl is wrong, he’s just a bit ahead of himself. As I myself have learned recently, carrying around my iPod Touch, WiFi hot spots are not always where you want them to be, and offer essentially no quality-of-service guarantee. Municipal WiFi initiatives have been slow to take off or have been left half-finished, so there’s no public WiFi infrastructure to speak of. But, the overall footprint of WiFi is improving, and the cost for using it keeps coming down (as the recent Starbucks announcement demonstrates), and the install base of laptops and handheld devices with WiFi is already very large and likely to keep growing, especially since the “3G” mobile broadband folks are still arguing over standards and charging exorbitant rates for usage. In fact, the network effect (no pun intended) of WiFi is already so well along that it might hamstring any effort to supplant it with mobile broadband unless mobile broaband can offer a very strong case for getting people to switch.

Bergendahl is not the only person to make this claim, though. A few weeks ago I read this opinion piece at the British tech website IT Pro saying basically the same thing. It’s worth observing, I think, that because the cellular service business is so much more competitive and robust in Europe and the U.K. than it is in the U.S., it IS probably more likely that mobile broadband will expand its reach faster there and have a better chance of supplanting WiFi than it will here.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Tech News Link Dump

The title says it all…

The science journal Nature reports that this company in nearby Concord, NH has announced that they were able to produce the largest single sheet made up completely of carbon nanotubes. The sheet, which measures about 2 meters in length and 1 meter wide and is about as thick as a sheet of paper, has almost half the breaking strength of a similar-sized sheet of aluminum. The company says that they expect to find markets in companies that make EMI shielding, electrical conductors, and thermal dissipating devices. There’s probably some future use for materials like this in the space program, I would imagine.

Meanwhile, this story in EETimes says that a California company has announced that they’ve perfected a manufacturing process to make catalytic nanoparticles that could be used in place of metals in hydrogen fuel cells and other things that use electrolysis to produce energy. They claim that due to the vastly increased surface area created by using millions of nanoparticles, the efficiency of the electrolysis can be improved to 85%, besting the Department of Energy’s 75% efficiency 2010 goal for hydrogen fuel cells, and holds the potential of reaching an unheardof 96% efficiency. Efficiency of energy production is critical in taking alternative fuel technologies beyond the experimental stage, and the relative inefficiency of standard electrolysis has been a serious stumbling block for hydrogen-based fuel cells.

I recently received an Apple iPod Touch as a present. On one hand, it’s a serious fun gadget to have; we took it with us on our recent trip to New York City and used the Google Map location feature to find our way around all over Manhattan (thanks to all the unsecured wireless networks people have in NYC), as well as looking up restaurants, bus schedules, and other points of interest. On the other hand, the limitations built into the iPhone/iTouch by Apple are sometimes infuriating (no Flash player, no Windows support, etc). I will undoubtedly go the route of “jailbreaking” my iTouch in the very near future so that I can make use of some of the third-party apps that work when you wrest control from Steverino’s icy clutches.

I read this morning that Apple says it won’t prevent VoIP applications from working on the iPhone/iTouch, which means that I should be able to install Skype or some Skype-like application and add the ability to make phone calls from my otherwise phone-less iTouch. I purposely did not want an iPhone because I wasn’t interested in having to sign on for a 2-year contract with AT&T (or to have to try getting it to work with some other provider), but if I can use Skype, I definitely would give that a go.

I also came across this post at OpenCulture that says that all incoming freshmen at Abilene Christian University in Texas this fall will receive either an iPhone or an iTouch and be able to use the school’s online services via the device to check food service accounts, class schedules, look up faculty/staff directory information and eventually even register for classes and purchase textbooks. They’ll also have access to podcasts of their lecture classes, be able to submit homework, and potentially even participate in class by submitting questions in writing (though I think this means the professors need to brush up on their IM-speak to be able to read the questions). While most colleges and universities have computer requirements these days, and many of them give their students a computer, this is certainly an interesting step up from those kinds of programs.

Remember the satellite that the Navy shot down a couple of weeks ago? Space expert James Oberg posted this article at MSNBC debunking some of the rumors that have already emerged about the shootdown and clearing up some other technical misconceptions that were widely mentioned in the MSM.

Lastly, Science Daily reported that researchers at the University of Alberta have found that humans have a gene that is capable of preventing HIV from assembling inside cells, effectively shutting down the disease. However, the gene is “turned off” by default in our DNA. They don’t expect to be able to turn that gene “on” (might I suggest some soft music, flowers, and dancing?), but they do hope to be able to develop drugs that mimic the effect of the gene and could indeed halt the progression of HIV. If you’re the sort who likes to read this stuff for yourself, the full report can be found here. (I read the abstract, but gave up after that)

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Tech, Tech And More Tech

1. Last week, Engadget posted about a British company which is demonstrating an improved GPS system that incorporates cellular signal triangulation right into the chip itself and will seamlessly switch between GPS and cellular signals.  If you have been following along, you know that I have been particularly interested in seeing this develop into the default technology for the iPhone and its imitators.  (As it stands today, the iPhone uses cellular and WiFi triangulation, but not GPS; the upcoming Nuviphone will use GPS and cellular, but through a software solution, not hardware).  This should take care of that nicely.

2. Meanwhile, this article at The First Post wonders if dedicated GPS devices are succumbing to “feature bloat” by adding lots of worthless innovations to maintain the “value” of those devices.  It’s a fair cop, because the stand-alone GPS gizmo probably only has 3-5 years left in its lifespan.  Built-in GPS systems are bubbling down into non-luxury cars as optional upgrades and will probably wind up as standard in most cars sooner rather than later.  And the obvious synergy of the GPS-enabled smartphone that we’ve been talking about is only one or two product cycles away.

3. One more handheld gizmo thing: this company has developed a web app for the iPhone that will let you remotely order your coffee beverage at Starbucks.  Here’s a pair of screenshots:

Once you arrive at the counter to pick up your double-shot no-foam soy-milk latte, you even use the iPhone to pay for the drink using a bar-code-like system that scans a “Semacode” image.

4. The NYT tech blog “Bits” reported on a recent change in banking laws that will now allow you to deposit checks to your checking account electronically from your home computer using a scanner to image the checks.  The law went into effect in 2003 so that banks could speed up check processing by sending images electronically to one another, but it also applies to the consumer. So far only USAA, the bank that services the military, has made this available to their customers, but you should expect to see it being offered by lots of banks soon now that Fiserv, the company that handles most of these transactions, has developed home-user software.  No word on how high the inevitable usurious fees will be to use this, but you can bet that the banks are thinking about that right now.

5. Lastly, do go and read this little rant about Bluetooth phone headsets from my friend and former cow-orker Dave Belfer-Shevett.  It made me smile.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Going The Way Of The Turbo-Nuked Breakfast Sandwich

I guess the gang at Starbucks are serious about trying to make up for some weak numbers.  They’ve finally figured out that charging people nine bucks an hour to use their in-store Wi-Fi wasn’t exactly keeping all those coffee-drinking web surfers hanging around in their stores to buy the crappy breakfast sandwiches and stale pastries. Ars Technica says that Starbucks is dumping T-Mobile in favor of using AT&T as their Wifi provider.

People who already have AT&T as their ISP will get unlimited access for free.  And if you’re not an AT&T broadband customer, just flashing a Starbucks pre-paid coffee card will get you two hours for free (and let’s face it, if you need to spend more than two hours online at a Starbucks, you probably need a job a lot more than the free WiFi).  The hoi polloi will still have to pay, but only $3.99/hour, which is less than buying a Venti Pumpkin Spice Latte with two extra shots anyway.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Scotty, Lock On To My Coordinates!

About this time last year, I bought a Garmin GPS for my car. It was a very worthwhile purchase; it made finding clients’ homes significantly easier, helped me get myself “unlost” more than once, and I even brought it along on the trip to Ireland my brothers and I took last March. When it got stolen out of my car back in the fall, I was quite unhappy to lose it, and very pleased when Bridget bought me a new one for Christmas.

One of the few criticisms I have about car GPSes is that they’re all but useless once you get into a built-up city. If there was ever a city where drivers needed GPS, it’s Boston, with its 17th-century tangle of narrow, irregular streets, but the tall buildings downtown block the satellite signals and after listening to the computerized voice say “Recalculating!” for the umpteenth time in two minutes, you might as well shut the thing off. It does work a bit better in other parts of the city, where the sky is a bit more open, but it can be spotty. I can’t see how you could use them at all in Manhattan or the Loop or any other metropolis with lots of skyscrapers.

So, there has to be a better way of helping you pinpoint and track locations when you’re at street level in most major American cities. One of the initial features of the Apple iPhone was its ability to locate you using coordinate data from cellular towers and plot you onto a Google map. The latest software updates to the iPhone improve on this system by also adding in the ability to detect and triangulate from WiFi networks at known physical coordinates. The one outstanding difficulty of using WiFi triangulation alone is that hotspots are not always associated with physical locations permanently, the way a cellular tower is, and so there will need to be quite a bit of regular surveying done to find, map, and maintain databases of hotspots.

In my dream world, the next generation of GPS units will integrate all three technologies and seamlessly switch between them, choosing whichever set of signals is strongest. Similarly, the next-gen iPhones should include an actual GPS receiver and do the same sort of on-the-fly signal comparison.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site