Tag XM-Sirius merger

Linkapalooza – Tech

Take a look at your next laptop’s 80GB hard drive. Yes, I said hard drive. Intel has just announced their solid-state hard drive product line beginning with this drive, called the X25-M. You can’t quite tell from this photo, but the form factor is designed around the 2.5-inch width that current laptop arm-and-platter disk drives use. However, it’s only as thick and as heavy as a typical chip-bearing circuit board, which is to say significantly less than traditional disk drives. This model has 80GB of storage, but Intel’s roadmap has 160GB models in the marketplace by early 2009, and smaller models available even sooner. The throughput performance of this drive is better than most current shipping 80GB laptop drives, and Intel claims that the lifespan of the drive should be five years (a complaint about flash-based drives to date has been the relatively small number of read-write cycles, but they claim to have worked around that). Because they are so efficient on I/O, solid-state drives are likely to be very quickly adopted for use in servers, enabling server hardware to shrink even more and reducing the likelihood of server downtime due to mechanical failures.

Now that the XM-Sirius merger is a done deal, the next thing to think about with regard to satellite radio is interoperability. In other words, making it possible for XM radios to receive Sirius signals and vice versa without making all their customers go out and buy new hardware. The FCC has already ruled that any new satellite radio receivers must be interoperable, but now they’ve put out a Notice Of Inquiry to decide whether or not satellite radios must also be interoperable with terrestrial HD radio. Ibiquity, Clear Channel, and NPR have all lobbied the FCC to mandate including HD Radio interoperability, but the FCC would only go so far as to launch the NOI, which starts a somewhat lengthy review process. This is not unlike the deliberations in the 1970s to compel radio makers to include the FM band on every radio; FM radio was the bald-headed stepchild of radio for decades because no one had FM receivers. Once FM popped up alongside AM on car radios, FM stations finally caught on, eventually pushing AM radio into obsolescence. A lesson no doubt everyone involved in this melodrama remembers all too well.

The idea of using bar-code technology with your hand-held communication device has been around for a while, but has only just now turned into an actual service of some kind. USA Today reports that Air France will start letting passengers travelling from Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris to Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam opt to receive their boarding passes as bar-code images or as text messages on their smartphones. Quite honestly, I don’t think this is such a great idea for airline boarding passes because of the ENORMOUS security risks it poses. Far better that this had been introduced as a service for something with a lot less inherent risk like movie tickets or supermarket deli waiting line numbers. It’s somewhat telling that Air France is only testing it on one route rather than their entire system, and I suspect that this will be slow to roll out, particularly with U.S. air carriers.

DSL Reports says that the number of consumers signing up for DSL service continues to free fall into nothingness. “DSL is the new dial-up” is the catchphrase du-jour in the broadband business as Verizon’s FiOS fiber-optical service has pushed cable companies to be more aggressive with their speed enhancements, leaving pokey ol’ DSL in the dust. According to that linked story, Verizon and AT&T together had a net LOSS of about 120,000 DSL customers in the second fiscal quarter. Anything that keeps the broadband market in the U.S. aiming toward the 100Mbps speed that’s standard in Korea and Japan is okay with me.

I’m not holding my breath, but this story from MuniWireless.com says that Boston is one of the cities where Sprint expects to rollout WiMax as municipal wireless service maybe even before the end of 2008. The rollout is underway right now in Baltimore, with over 1000 wireless access points in the city. Chicago and Washington DC are expected to be launched before the end of the year, and then the next tier of cities includes Philadelphia, Dallas, and The Hub Of The Universe itself. Seems they’ve figured out how to speed up the process of getting the WAPs out into the field so that they can place up to 25 per day, making the rollouts go much faster than originally projected.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

Linkapalooza – Tech

Via Slashdot, this tech website got a sneak peek at the proposed connectors and cable for the upcoming USB 3.0 spec. The spec was first previewed back in January, and won’t be finalized until later this year, but Intel released what they’ve already come up with so far, which is about 90% of the final spec. As I posted before (see that second link above) USB 3.0 will be ten times faster than the current USB 2.0, in part because it will allow two-way data transfer. That’s a big improvement over the earlier versions. The linked article gives this example: a 27-gig file will transfer from your hard drive to your USB 3.0-compatible device in 1 minute and 10 seconds. Moving the same-sized file over USB 2.0 takes at least 15 minutes. Ain’t nobody going to complain about that. Plus, USB 3.0 will be downwardly compatible with USB 2.0, so your present-day devices won’t be doomed to the scrap heap any earlier than they would be otherwise. But, as I cautioned a few months ago, it will be at least 2010 before you see this in any shipping hardware of any kind.

Haven’t heard much about Vonage lately, which, if you’re Vonage, is a good thing. This recent post at DSL Reports says that Vonage had finally managed to stem the hemorrage of users that had been going on even before the patent lawsuits but had gotten to a critical level when it looked like Vonage was going to have to close its doors. Prior to the lawsuits, Vonage’s astronomical churn rate was almost 100% due to customer service issues, so that speaks well for their ability to fix their own internal problems. We actually switched from Vonage to Comcast when things looked bleakest for Vonage, but the actual phone service from Comcast was terrible, and you KNOW how bad Comcast’s customer support is, so after three months or so we went back to Vonage. Quite honestly, we have never had any significant problems with Vonage technically or support-wise, but I guess we’re in the minority…or we were.

The XM-Sirius merger finally went through several weeks ago, and earlier this month CEO Mel Karmazin promised that new hardware that would be cross-compatible with both services would be available in the first quarter of 2009. So much for getting that new satellite radio for your car for Christmas, I guess, but that’s ahead of the 12-month deadline set by the FCC, so good for them.

Garmin’s highly-anticipated (well, by me, anyway) Nuviphone has been pushed back to sometime in the first half of 2009 due to difficulties meeting the requirements of some of the carriers. Lately, I am so enamored of my iPod Touch that the temptation to buy a 3G iPhone has been getting pretty strong, but my blog buddy Jack and others are finding that the new iPhone isn’t quite “twice as fast for half the price”, so I will continue to bide my time to see if the Nuviphone pans out.

And this isn’t really a tech link, but it’s related: TechDirt.com points to this British IT news website’s report that 30% of Internet users admit to buying products via links in spam e-mail. The report cites a study by web security vendor Marshal, showing a marked increase from earlier studies by analysts like Forrester Research; in 2004, Forrester calculated that 20% of Internet users bought items via spam. Considering that in the traditional mail-order business, a response rate of 4% was considered huge, the success of spam is simply unheard of. That’s a lot of enlarged penises and Paris Hilton videos, kiddies.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

So Why Bother With The Radio At All?

Tech blogger Dave Zatz reports that the satellite radio service XM has announced that it will start publishing free podcasts of some of its regular programming on Apple’s iTunes.

As someone who listens to an iPod in the car EXCLUSIVELY, I don’t know if this is going to convince me to buy an XM radio. How is someone else’s playlist going to be meaningfully different than the music I already listen to? Is the presence of a “radio personality” an improvement that justifies the cost? Depends on the performer and the content, I guess. A regular DJ just introing music is not, but maybe Bob Dylan is. I haven’t missed commercial radio at all since I started using an iPod almost four years ago, so the same is probably true for XM’s musical programming. And I don’t expect they’re giving away their non-music programming or any of the rest of their premium content.

The XM-Sirius merger will take place in early 2008, eliminating whatever overlap there is between the two services, and hopefully creating an overall-improved programming package where the stronger offerings from one network will replace the weaker offerings of another. At that point, the REAL issue that satellite radio needs to address is whether it’s the least bit relevant in the face of its competition. This recent BusinessWeek article says that the merger “makes sense”, but it does so from an argument that says that satellite radio isn’t worth the effort because of its miniscule market share, so who cares if there’s only one service provider. At that point, I’m not so sure that giving away any programming is viable unless their real intentions are to give up the satellite broadcasting and just be a content provider.

EmailStumbleUponRedditFacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Related Posts:

All Original Content Copyright © BrianKaneOnline
All Other Content Copyright © Its Original Authors

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site